Volume 41 Issue 1
Feb.  2025
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
LI Hong. A Study on the Motivation and Characteristics of Faculty Participation in Teaching Reform in Research Universities[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2025, 41(1): 39-50. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2024070011
Citation: LI Hong. A Study on the Motivation and Characteristics of Faculty Participation in Teaching Reform in Research Universities[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2025, 41(1): 39-50. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2024070011

A Study on the Motivation and Characteristics of Faculty Participation in Teaching Reform in Research Universities-A Perspective Based on the Analysis of Symbolic Interaction Theory

doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2024070011
  • Received Date: 2024-04-02
  • Publish Date: 2025-02-01
  • To improve the teaching quality in universities requires continuous exploration of teaching reform, and the specific implementation of teaching reform depends on front-line teachers. And the motivation of faculty to participate is a key factor leading to the success of teaching reform. Based on qualitative research methods, this study used interview method, participatory observation method, physical collection method and other methods to collect data. In-depth interviews were conducted with 33 front-line teachers coming from 18 research universities and 11 first-level disciplines. The Nvivo software was used to complete the theoretical construction according to the operating procedures of three-level coding and the method of grounded theory. It is found in the study that the motivation of faculty to participate in teaching reform includes 32 types of dynamic factors, which were classified into 4 categories: the dominant factors of different subjects, the dominant factors of the practice process, the dominant factors of the target outcome and the dominant factors of the situational scenario. Based on the analysis of symbolic interaction theory, it is found that the motivation of faculty to participate in teaching reform is situational, dynamic and changeable, and the dynamic factors are multiple, contradictory and complicated. The dynamic factors are open interactive and symbiotic. Based on the above characteristics, the government, universities and teaching administrators of secondary colleges are suggested to build a positive culture for teaching reform, give full play to the positive effects of the teaching system, and provide support and guarantee for teaching.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    卡尔·雅斯贝尔斯. 大学之理念[M]. 邱立波,译. 上海:上海世纪出版集团,上海人民出版社,2007.
    [2]
    埃里克·阿什比. 科技发达时代的大学教育[M]. 滕大春,译. 北京:人民教育出版社,1983.
    [3]
    李虹. 大学教学改革:现状及推进策略——基于对224名研究型大学一线教师的调查分析[J]. 北京科技大学学报(社会科学版),2023,39(4):405-412.
    [4]
    荀振芳,张男星. 核心素养导向的大学课程目标建构研究[J]. 北京科技大学学报(社会科学版),2023,39(2):141-148.
    [5]
    马廷奇,钟颖. 大学本科教学改革:目标、困境与动力[J]. 北京科技大学学报(社会科学版),2016,32(2):94-99. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-2689.2016.02.013
    [6]
    伯顿·R·克拉克. 高等教育系统——学术组织的跨国研究[M]. 王承绪,译. 杭州:浙江大学出版社,1994.
    [7]
    陈遇春,李厚. 高校教学改革中教师组织问题的研究与探索[J]. 中国大学教学,2011(11):63-65. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-0450.2011.11.021
    [8]
    罗伯特·C·波格丹. 教育研究方法:定性研究的视角(第4版)[M]. 钟周,译. 北京:中国人民大学出版社,2008.
    [9]
    尹超. 扎根理论的内涵、特点及其在教育研究中的应用[J]. 现代教育论丛,2005(05):12-17.
    [10]
    WALKER D & MYRICK F. Grounded theory:an exploration of process and procedure [J]. Qualitative Health Research,2006,16(4):547-559. doi: 10.1177/1049732305285972
    [11]
    乔治·H·米德. 心灵、自我与社会[M]. 赵月瑟,译. 上海:上海译文出版社,2018.
    [12]
    HERBERT B. Symbolic Interactionism:Perspective and Method [M]. Oakland:University of California Press,1986.
    [13]
    阎光才. 大学教师行为背后的制度与文化归因——立足于偏好的研究视角[J]. 高等教育研究,2022,43(1):56-68.
    [14]
    伍多·库卡茨. 质性文本分析:方法、实践与软件使用指南[M]. 朱志勇,范晓慧,译. 重庆:重庆大学出版社,2017.
    [15]
    GRAFFIGNA G. Situational analysis:Grounded theory after the postmodern turn [J]. International Journal of Social Research Methodology,2009(12):378-381.
    [16]
    陈向明,王富伟. 扎根理论研究需要如何读文献?兼论扎根理论不同版本的界定之争[J]. 比较教育学报,2020(2):3-14. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-8495.2020.02.001
    [17]
    鲍威,杜嫱. 冲突、独立、互补:研究型大学教师教学行为与科研表现间关系的实证研究[J]. 北京大学教育评论,2017(10):107-125,187-188.
    [18]
    HERBERT B. Mead and Human Conduct [M]. New York:Altamira Press,2004.
    [19]
    邬大光. 大学需关注“需求侧”[J]. 高等理科教育,2023(2):3.
    [20]
    克拉克·克尔. 大学之用[M]. 高铦,高戈,汐汐,译. 北京:北京大学出版社,2019.
    [21]
    弗雷德·鲁能伯格. 教育管理学:概念与实践(第五版)[M]. 朱志勇,郑磊,译. 北京:中国轻工业出版社,2013.
    [22]
    皮埃尔·布迪厄,华康德. 实践与反思—反思社会学导引[M]. 李猛,李康,译. 北京:中央编译出版社,1998.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Tables(4)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (112) PDF downloads(18) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return