Constructing a Chinese Route and Ecosophy for Double Carbon Discourse through the News Reports from <i>China Daily</i> and <i>Xinhua</i>

REN Ran; GAO Ge

doi:10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2024010030

Volume 40 Issue 4

Aug. 2024

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Article Navigation > Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition) > 2024 > 40(4): 94-103

REN Ran, GAO Ge. Constructing a Chinese Route and Ecosophy for Double Carbon Discourse through the News Reports from China Daily and Xinhua[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2024, 40(4): 94-103. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2024010030

Citation:

REN Ran, GAO Ge. Constructing a Chinese Route and Ecosophy for Double Carbon Discourse through the News Reports from China Daily and Xinhua[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2024, 40(4): 94-103. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2024010030

Citation:

PDF( 1034 KB)

Constructing a Chinese Route and Ecosophy for Double Carbon Discourse through the News Reports from China Daily and Xinhua

doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2024010030

REN Ran,
GAO Ge

School of Languages and Communication Studies, Beijing Jiaotong University,Beijing 100044, China

Received Date: 2024-01-09
Publish Date: 2024-08-01

Abstract

Abstract

Green low-carbon development with sustainability has become a global consensus. The dual-carbon goal of carbon emission peak and carbon neutrality proposed by China as the largest developing country is a solemn commitment to build a community with a shared future for mankind. The Chinese mainstream international media is an important window for the international community to understand China’s implementation of the dual-carbon goal, and an important position to fight for the right of discourse on public opinion on green transformation. This study draws upon the transitivity, the theme, quotation practice, and conceptual metaphor to analyze the eco-discourse of 10 English-language news reports on dual-carbon in the mainstream Chinese international media. This study proves that the “diversity and harmony, interaction and co-existence ecosophy” underpins the reports and thereby establishes an ecosophy of “establishing the new before breaking the old, breaking the boundary before undergoing a rebirth” for the discourse of double carbon. This study hence investigates the flexibility and operability of a systematic integration between systematic functional linguistics and discursive analysis, expands the dimension of China-specific ecosophy, and refines China’s “double carbon” discursive system both theoretically and practically.
- double carbon,
- ecological discourse analysis,
- systematic functional linguistics,
- conceptual metaphor,
- ecosophy

FullText(HTML)

References(38)

References

[1]	World Meteorological Organization. The global climate 2011—2020 A decade of accelerating climate change [R/OL]. (2023-12-5)[2024-3-25]. https://library.wmo.int/idurl/4/68585.
[2]	FU R,JIN G,CHEN J,et al. The effects of poverty alleviation investment on carbon emissions in China based on the multiregional input—output model [J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change,2021,162:120344.
[3]	Word Resources Institute. Turning points:trends in countries’ reaching peak greenhouse gas emissions over time [R/OL]. (2022-12-25)[2024-03-25]. https://www.wri.org/insights/turning-point-which-countries-ghg-emissions-have-peaked-which-will-future.
[4]	BCG中国气候与可持续发展中心. 中国碳中和通用指引[M]. 北京:中信出版社,2021.
[5]	HALLIDAY M A K. New ways of meaning:The challenge to applied linguistics [J]. Journal of Applied Linguistics,1990(6):7-36.
[6]	GOATLY A. Green grammar and grammatical metaphor,or language and the myth of power,metaphors we die by [J]. Journal of Pragmatics,1996,25(4):537-560.
[7]	王晋军. 生态语言学:语言学研究的新视域[J]. 天津外国语学院学报,2007(1):53-57.
[8]	MARTIN J R. Grace:The logogenesis of freedom [J]. Discourse Studies,1999,1(1):29-56.
[9]	戴桂玉,仇娟. 语言、环境、社会——生态酒店英文简介之生态批评性话语分析[J]. 外语与外语教学,2012(1):48-52.
[10]	杨开烨,汪少华. 中国生态话语文化图式的认知阐释[J]. 外语研究,2023,40(1):8-16.
[11]	赵蕊华. 系统功能视角下生态话语分析的多层面模式——以生态报告中银无须鳕身份构建为例[J]. 中国外语,2016(5):84-91.
[12]	陈令君. 及物性系统视角下田园诗的生态话语分析——以陶渊明《归园田居》(其一)及其英译为例[J]. 山东外语教学,2019,40(1):23-32.
[13]	于晖,王丽萍. 生态话语及物性分析模式探究——以教育语篇为例[J]. 外语与外语教学,2020(6):43-54,120,148.
[14]	何伟,魏榕. 国际生态话语之及物性分析模式构建[J]. 现代外语,2017,40(5):597-607,709.
[15]	STIBBE A. Ecolinguistics:Language,Ecology,Ecology,and the Stories We Live by [M]. London and New York:Routledge,2015.
[16]	SCHROLL M A. From ecopsychology to transpersonal ecosophy:Shamanism,psychedelics and transpersonal psychology:An autobiographical reflection [J]. European Journal of Ecopsychology,2013,4:116-144.
[17]	王学渊,李忠建. 市场经济生态之浅见[J]. 特区经济,2007(1):125-126.
[18]	郑高花. 试论生态伦理——价值观[J]. 前沿,2011(5):192-195. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-8267.2011.05.045
[19]	刘衍. 环境话语生态性构建研究:以“《中国日报》气候变化报道话语语料库”为例[J]. 北京科技大学学报(社会科学版),2021,37(3):254-263.
[20]	何伟,魏榕. 多元和谐,交互共生——国际生态话语分析之生态哲学观建构 J]. 外语学刊,2018(6):28-35.
[21]	郭海婷. 法国政治语篇中的低碳话语建构[J]. 天津外国语大学学报,2019,26(2):42-54,159.
[22]	章吟. 德国主流媒体低碳经济报道的话语建构策略——一项语料库辅助的话语分析[J]. 浙江外国语学院学报,2023(5):26-35.
[23]	钱毓芳. 《纽约时报》关于低碳经济的话语建构[J]. 天津外国语大学学报,2019,26(2):29-41,159.
[24]	赵秀凤,任安琪. 气候政治中的“他者”:法新社对中国“碳中和”的媒介化重构[J]. 中国石油大学学报(社会科学版),2023,39(4):58-68.
[25]	田海龙,宋冰冰. 低碳治理行动中的话语互动与地方能动性[J]. 中国石油大学学报(社会科学版),2023,39(4):50-57.
[26]	翁青青. 企业碳中和形象的话语建构——基于合法化语码理论的视角[J]. 中国石油大学学报(社会科学版),2024,40(1):63-71.
[27]	钱毓芳,王琮涵. 《人民日报》对“碳达峰碳中和”的话语建构——基于语料库的话语研究[J]. 中国石油大学学报(社会科学版),2023,39(4):69-77.
[28]	崔璨. 中国国际媒体“双碳目标”英语新闻的多模态话语分析与对外传播研究[J]. 黄山学院学报,2023,25(4):92-96. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-447X.2023.04.017
[29]	HALLIDAY M A K & MATTHIESSEN C M I M. Halliday ’s Introduction to Functional Grammar (4th ed.) [M]. London:Routledge,2014.
[30]	黄国文,陈瑜敏. 系统功能语言学十讲[M]. 上海:上海外语教育出版社,2021.
[31]	周国文,李霜霜. 生态和谐:一个生态世界的构想[J]. 鄱阳湖学刊,2013(3):61-67.
[32]	何伟,高然,刘佳欢. 生态话语分析新发展研究[M]. 北京:清华大学出版社,2021.
[33]	何伟,马宸. 生态语言学视角下的主位系统[J]. 中国外语,2020,17(4):23-32.
[34]	辛斌,高小丽. 批评话语分析:目标、方法与动态[J]. 外语与外语教学,2013(4):1-5,16.
[35]	乔治·莱考夫,马克·约翰逊. 我们赖以生存的隐喻[M]. 何文忠,译. 杭州:浙江大学出版社,2015.
[36]	王琳璘,廉永辉,董捷. ESG表现对企业价值的影响机制研究[J]. 证券市场导报,2022(5):23-34. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-1589.2022.5.zqscdb202205003
[37]	高虎. “双碳”目标下中国能源转型路径思考[J]. 国际石油经济,2021,29(3):1-6. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-7298.2021.03.001
[38]	叶青海,楚鸿健,张慧莹,等. “双碳”目标下我国煤炭减量化使用的压力指数测度研究[J]. 工业技术经济,2023,42(3):43-53. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-910X.2023.03.005

Relative Articles

[1]	HE Wei, TIAN Yi. A Contrastive Study of Chinese and French International Chinese Language Textbooks from the Perspective of Ecolinguistics[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2024, 40(5): 65-73. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2024040123
[2]	HUANG Guo-wen. What Is Systemic Functional Linguistics[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2023, 39(1): 73-89. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022100090
[3]	LI Bingnan, SUN Yi. Multimodal Ecological Concept Construction of Only One World[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2023, 39(5): 563-573. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2023030033
[4]	ZENG Lei, ZHU Xin-yu, YE Lan. A Study of Projection in Ideational Grammatical Metaphor in BA Dissertation — Taking the Chapter of Literature Review as an Example[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2022, 38(2): 162-171. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2021050082
[5]	YU Hui, SONG Jin-ge. A Multimodal Approach to the Social Semiotic Construction of Ecological Meanings in Children’s Picture Book[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2022, 38(6): 667-676. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022100067
[6]	PAN Jie, YUAN Su-rong. An Eco-discourse Analysis of Return to Nature from the Perspective of Systemic Functional Linguistics[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2022, 38(2): 185-192. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2021090018
[7]	CHEN Ming-fang, CAO Jun-feng. Lexico-grammatical Realization of Ecosophy in the Nature Poem of What Mystery Pervades a Well[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 37(3): 239-246.
[8]	SONG Ping, JIN Zhi-ru. A Contrastive Ecological Discourse Analysis of English Translations of Chinese Public Signs on Environmental Protection[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 37(6): 599-605.
[9]	LIU Yan. The Construction of Ecological Features of Environmental Discourse: As Exemplified in the “China Daily News Corpus of Climate Change”[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 37(3): 254-263.
[10]	CHANG Yuan. An Analysis of the State of the Art of Ecolinguistics at Home and Abroad[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 37(6): 583-591.
[11]	YANG Cai-ying, ZHONG Ting. The Transitivity Approach to the Ecological Care in The Call of The Wild[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 36(3): 28-32,40.
[12]	YUAN Ying. The Ecological Approach of Media Reports: An Ecological Discourse Analysis of the BBC News Headlines about China Haze[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 34(4): 33-41.
[13]	GAO Sheng-wen. On the Development of Journals of Universities in the “Double World-class” Construction from the Perspective of Systemic Functional Linguistics[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 34(2): 33-39.
[14]	CHANG Jun-fang, CONG Ying-xu. A Multi-stratal Pattern of Ecological Discourse Analysis from a Systemic Functional Perspective: A Case Study on the Speech of China’s Minister of Environment Protection[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 34(4): 27-32.
[15]	CHEN Rong. A Study of Non-impersonal Features in the Introductions of Ecology Papers[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 34(4): 42-48.
[16]	ZHANG Hong-yan, LI Man-liang. A Systemic Functional Analysis of Chinese Nominal Group with Classifier Phrases/Measure Phrases as the Modifier[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2017, 33(6): 40-44.
[17]	LI Xue-ning, FAN Xin-ying. Research on the Know ledge Representation Method of Systemic Functional Linguistics[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2015, 31(3): 26-30.
[18]	HUI Zhang-zheng. Theory and Practice of History Discourse Analysis—from the Perspective of Systemic Functional Linguistics[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2015, 31(1): 33-38.
[19]	ZHANG Rui. A Comparison between Conceptual Metaphors in Chinese and English Sayings of Life[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2012, 28(2): 42-50.
[20]	HOU Jian-bo, SUN Jing-yi. Conceptual Metaphor and Ideology: Based on the Study of H1N1 Discourse[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2011, 27(2): 33-38.

Supplements(0)

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(4)

1.	朱晖，赵佳齐. 蓝碳交易认证及运行机制的挑战与应对. 北京科技大学学报(社会科学版). 2025(01): 61-68 .
2.	吴雪萍，陈端，林曙光. 环境规制与经济发展质量——基于市场分割和政绩考核的调节效应. 北京科技大学学报(社会科学版). 2025(03): 67-80 .
3.	齐卫华，张晓晨，丁文舒. “双碳”语境下《中国能源报》能源话语特征分析及生成逻辑. 中国石油大学学报(社会科学版). 2025(02): 59-68 .
4.	刘昊，蒲安妮. 中国日报“双碳”报道文档主题挖掘研究. 中国传媒大学学报(自然科学版). 2024(05): 32-40 .