Volume 41 Issue 1
Feb.  2025
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
SUN Chenxi. The Nature Orientation and Enlightenment of Primary-face Proof[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2025, 41(1): 51-60. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2023120018
Citation: SUN Chenxi. The Nature Orientation and Enlightenment of Primary-face Proof[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2025, 41(1): 51-60. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2023120018

The Nature Orientation and Enlightenment of Primary-face Proof

doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2023120018
  • Received Date: 2023-12-04
  • Publish Date: 2025-02-01
  • How to identify the facts and apply the laws is a common problem in litigation. From the aspects of strengthening the judge’s mental impression, easing the burden of proof of the parties, and ensuring the equality of arms between the parties, as a special way of fact finding, primary-face proof plays an irreplaceable role in trial practice. However, after a long period of debate, theoretical research and prejudication remain controversial on how to define thr primary-face proof, so when considering whether to introduce the system into the Civil Procedure Law of our country, there are many concerns. In order to make primary-face proof play its due function value, it should be clear on the basis of its nature, learning from foreign related theories, analyzing and combing its basic structure, so as to provide effective experience for China’s civil legislation.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    王亚新. 对抗与判定——日本民事诉讼的基本结构[M]. 北京:清华大学出版社,2010.
    [2]
    胡学军. 表见证明理论批判[J]. 法律科学,2014,32(4):90-101.
    [3]
    毕玉谦. 试论表见证明的基本属性与应用功能之界定[J]. 证据科学,2007(1):97-112.
    [4]
    龙宗智. 推定的界限及适用[J]. 法学研究,2008(1):106-125.
    [5]
    周翠. 从事实推定走向表见证明[J]. 现代法学,2014,36(6):108-126.
    [6]
    张卫平. 自由心证原则的再认识:制约与保障——以民事诉讼的事实认定为中心[J]. 政法论丛,2017(4):14-21.
    [7]
    最高人民法院民事审判第一庭,编著. 民事诉讼证据司法解释的理解与适用[M]. 北京:中国法制出版社,2002.
    [8]
    普维庭. 现代证明责任问题[M]. 吴越,译. 北京:法律出版社,2006.
    [9]
    曾培芳,段文波. 德国表见证明理论在医疗诉讼证明责任分配中的运用[J]. 政治与法律,2007(4):170-175.
    [10]
    姜世明. 举证责任与证明度[M]. 厦门:厦门大学出版社,2017.
    [11]
    吴杰. 民事诉讼法证明标准理论研究[M]. 北京:法律出版社,2007.
    [12]
    陈界融. 证据法:证明负担原理与法则研究[M]. 北京:中国人民大学出版社,2004.
    [13]
    高桥宏志. 民事诉讼法:制度与理论的深层分析[M]. 林剑锋,译. 北京:法律出版社,2003.
    [14]
    邱聪智. 从侵权行为归责原理之变动论危险责任之构成[M]. 北京:中国人民大学出版社,2006.
    [15]
    姜世明. 证据评价论[M]. 厦门:厦门大学出版社,2017.
    [16]
    新堂幸司. 新民事诉讼法[M]. 林剑锋,译. 北京:法律出版社,2008.
    [17]
    胡学军. 具体举证责任论[M]. 北京:法律出版社,2014.
    [18]
    江伟,主编. 中国证据法草案(建议稿)及立法理由书[M]. 北京:中国人民大学出版社,2004.
    [19]
    中共中央关于全面推进依法治国若干重大问题的决定[N]. 人民日报,2014-10-29(01).
    [20]
    周强. 推进严格司法[N]. 人民日报,2014-11-14(06).
    [21]
    张卫平. 民事证据法[M]. 北京:法律出版社,2017.
    [22]
    乔芳娥,王发财. 辩论主义视角下民事自认的“审判拘束效”[J]. 北京科技大学学报(社会科学版),2023,39(6):789-797.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (31) PDF downloads(15) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return