Research on the Grammatical Negation System in English Sentiment Analysis: The Cardiff Grammar Perspective

LI Xuening; HU Ziwei

doi:10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2023100061

Volume 40 Issue 5

Jul. 2024

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition) > 2024 > 40(5): 74-82

LI Xuening, HU Ziwei. Research on the Grammatical Negation System in English Sentiment Analysis: The Cardiff Grammar Perspective[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2024, 40(5): 74-82. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2023100061

Citation:

LI Xuening, HU Ziwei. Research on the Grammatical Negation System in English Sentiment Analysis: The Cardiff Grammar Perspective[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2024, 40(5): 74-82. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2023100061

Citation:

PDF( 863 KB)

Research on the Grammatical Negation System in English Sentiment Analysis: The Cardiff Grammar Perspective

doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2023100061

School of Foreign Studies, Jiangnan University, Wuxi 214026, China

Received Date: 2023-10-22
Publish Date: 2024-07-08

Abstract

Abstract

The study, grounded in the Cardiff Grammar within Systemic Functional Linguistics, harnesses the SST film review corpus to facilitate investigation. It delves into the collocation patterns of the grammatical negation system “not” alongside sentiment words within sentiment analysis. Results show that grammatical negation chiefly manifests as mood negation, wherein the subject often assumes the role of the evaluated object, carrying the attribute relationship in action processes, mental processes, and relational processes. The negation word “not” exhibits the highest frequency of collocation with purely emotional and emotional reactive words, while demonstrating the lowest frequency with emotionally charged words associated with difficulty and importance. Furthermore, the negation effect of the sentiment words varies depending on the semantic connotations. In the case of purely emotional and emotional reactive words, the negation word attenuates the intensity of the original word when polarity is altered. Conversely no such weakening effect transpires with behavioral judgment and social judgment words. Sentiment words with negative polarity remain negative polarity by the negation word. This study proves enlightening in unraveling the intricate phenomenon of negation words within sentiment analysis. By annotating the semantic levels of sentiment words, the accuracy of common negation expressions encompassing this category of vocabulary is enhanced.
- negation,
- sentiment analysis,
- negation effect,
- Cardiff Grammar

FullText(HTML)

References(30)

References

[1]	戴维. 现代语言学词典 [Z]. 沈家煊,译. 北京:商务印书馆,2000.
[2]	苗兴伟. 否定结构的语篇功能[J]. 外语教学与研究,2011,43(2):220-229,230.
[3]	梁晓波. 否定的认知分析[J]. 外语研究,2004(5):12-18,80. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-7242.2004.05.003
[4]	PANG B,LEE L & VAITHYANATHAN S. Thumbs up? Sentiment classification using machine learning techniques [J/OL]. (2002-05-07)[2023-01-02]. https://arxiv.org/pdf/cs.CL/0205070.
[5]	HALLIDAY M A K & MATTHIESSEN C M I M. An Introduction to Functional Grammar [M]. London:Edward Arnold,2004.
[6]	刘英. 否定系统与语类变体——一项基于英语学术语篇的否定概率研究[J]. 外语与外语教学,2013(1):27-30.
[7]	MARTIN J R & WHITE P R R. The Language of Evaluation:Appraisal in English [M]. London:Palgrave Macmillan,2005.
[8]	包兴佳,罗载兵. 英语否定极性的学术语篇发生研究:系统功能语言学视角[J]. 北京科技大学(社会科学版),2022,38(5):533-542.
[9]	SUN S A & CROSTHWAITE P. 'Establish a niche’ via negation:A corpus-based study of Move 2 in Ph. D. thesis introductions across disciplines [J]. Open Linguis tics,2022,8(1):189-208. doi: 10.1515/opli-2022-0190
[10]	张宇. 语言学视角下的国内外情感研究现状与趋势分析(2011—2020)[J]. 外国语,2022,45(1):67-68. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-5139.2022.01.007
[11]	王品. 系统功能类型学视阈下的语法描写范式——以语气系统为例[J]. 外国语(上海外国语大学学报),2022,45(5):53-64.
[12]	HATZIVASSILOGLOU V & WIEBE J M. Effects of adjective orientation and gradability on sentence subjectivity [C]// HITOSHI IIDA. Association for Computational Linguistics. Hong Kong; Stroudsburg:ACL,2000:299-305.
[13]	张成功,刘培玉,朱振方,等. 一种基于极性词典的情感分析方法[J]. 山东大学学报(理学版),2012,47(3):47-50.
[14]	KENNEDY A & INKPEN D. Sentiment classification of movie reviews using contextual valence shifters [J]. Computational Intelligence,2006,22(2):110-125. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8640.2006.00277.x
[15]	POLANYI L,ZAENEN A. Contextual valence shifters [J]. Computing attitude and affect in text:Theory and applications,2006,20(1):1-10.
[16]	MOILANEN K & PULMAN S. Sentiment composition [C]// RUSLAN MITKOV. International Conference Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing. Borovets:John Benjamin,2007:378–382.
[17]	CHOI Y & CARDIE C. Learning with Compositional Semantics as Structural Inference for Subsentential Sentiment Analysis [C]// ALLEN J. Association for Computational Linguistics. Columbus:ACL,2008:793-801.
[18]	SAURI R. A factuality profiler for eventualities in text [D]. Waltham:Brandeis University,2008.
[19]	BENAMARA F,CHARDON B,MATHIEU Y et al. How do negation and modality impact on opinions? [C]// MORANTE R & SPORLEDER C. Proceedings of the Workshop on Extra-Propositional Aspects of Meaning in Computational Linguistics. Korea:ACL,2012:10-18.
[20]	TABOADA M. Sentiment Analysis:An overview from linguistics [J]. Linguistics,2016(2):1-52.
[21]	姚天昉,娄德成. 汉语语句主题语义倾向分析方法的研究[J]. 中文信息学报,2007(5):73-79. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-0077.2007.05.014
[22]	钟佳娃,刘巍,王思丽,等. 文本情感分析方法及应用综述[J]. 数据分析与知识发现,2021,5(6):1-13.
[23]	黄国文,何伟,廖楚燕. 系统功能语法入门:加的夫模式 [M]. 北京:北京大学出版社,2008.
[24]	张德禄. 加的夫语法述评[J]. 当代语言学,2011,13(3):247-255,286.
[25]	高胜林. 肯定形式否定句语用探析[J]. 语文研究,2012(03):15-18. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2979.2012.03.004
[26]	FAWCETT R P. A Theory of Syntax for Systemic Functional Linguistics [M]. Cardiff:John Benjamins,2000.
[27]	张菊芬. 从功能语法理论的角度看表达将来时间的主要语法形式[J]. 解放军外国语学院学报,2001(5):29-32. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-722X.2001.05.008
[28]	何伟,张瑞杰,淡晓红,等. 汉语功能语义分析 [M]. 外语教学与研究出版社,2017.
[29]	许智宏,于子琪,董永峰,等. 影评情感分析知识图谱构建研究[J]. 计算机仿真,2020,37(8):424-430. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9348.2020.08.091
[30]	黄国文. 系统功能语言学中的加的夫语法[J]. 浙江外国语学院学报,2023(3):1-24. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-2074.2023.03.001