Volume 40 Issue 3
Apr.  2024
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
LI Hao, LIU Xuan. Discourse Innovation and Significance of “Chinese Path to Modernization” under the Comparative Perspective of East and West[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2024, 40(3): 10-15. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2023100017
Citation: LI Hao, LIU Xuan. Discourse Innovation and Significance of “Chinese Path to Modernization” under the Comparative Perspective of East and West[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2024, 40(3): 10-15. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2023100017

Discourse Innovation and Significance of “Chinese Path to Modernization” under the Comparative Perspective of East and West

doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2023100017
  • Received Date: 2023-10-09
  • Publish Date: 2024-04-19
  • The long-standing discourse of “modernization” views tradition and modernity, East and West with binary thinking, and thus fails to see the real world history and the direction of human civilization. By reviewing the perspectives and dimensions of human beings’ understanding of world history and their own existence, we can historically define two types: the chaotic pattern of the classical period and the disintegrated pattern of the traditional period. Human civilization has been lost in the Western “modernization”, while the discourse “Chinese path to modernization” has created the “modern” period on the basis of reviving the chaotic pattern of the classical period and inherited the divisive pattern of the traditional period. The discourse of “Chinese path to modernization” has created the convergent pattern of the “modern” period. This new discourse gives human civilization at a critical moment a new future imagination, containing “community of human destiny”, “people’s democracy in the whole process”, “common wealth”, “high-quality development” and other new propositions, Additionally, “Chinese path to modernization” breaks free from narrow ethnocentrism bridges the gap between tradition and modernity, between East and West, and depicts the concrete shape of the direction of human evolution as indicated by the Marxist concept of material history.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    万俊人. 现代性的多元镜鉴[J]. 中国社会科学,2022(7):4-20,204.
    [2]
    艾恺. 持续焦虑:世界范围内的反现代化思潮 [M]. 北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店,2022.
    [3]
    杨宽. 古史探微[M]. 上海:上海人民出版社,2016.
    [4]
    科瓦奇. 科瓦奇讲古希腊 [M]. 张天鸽,译. 北京:新世界出版社,2019.
    [5]
    杨伯峻. 孟子译注[M]. 北京:中华书局,1960.
    [6]
    麦克里兰. 西方政治思想史上[M]. 北京:中信出版社,2018.
    [7]
    刘同舫. 启蒙理性及现代性:马克思的批判性重构[J]. 中国社会科学,2015(2):4-23,202.
    [8]
    费尔巴哈. 费尔巴哈著作选集(下卷)[M]. 王大庆,译. 北京:商务印书馆,1984.
    [9]
    马克思,恩格斯. 马克思恩格斯选集(第一卷) [M]. 北京:人民出版社,2012.
    [10]
    李泽厚. 中国古代思想史论[M]. 北京:人民文学出版社,2021.
    [11]
    冯友兰. 中国哲学史新编(下)[M]. 北京:人民出版社,2007.
    [12]
    唐士其. 西方政治思想史[M]. 北京:北京大学出版社,2016.
    [13]
    姚大志. 后现代主义与启蒙[J]. 社会科学战线,2005(1):31-38.
    [14]
    习近平. 与世界相交 与时代相通 在可持续发展道路上阔步前行——在第二届联合国全球可持续交通大会开幕式上的主旨讲话[N]. 人民日报,2021-10-15(02).
    [15]
    习近平. 共创开放繁荣的美好未来——在第五届中国国际进口博览会开幕式上的致辞[N]. 人民日报,2022-11-08(01).
    [16]
    费孝通,麻国庆. 美好社会与美美与共 [M]. 北京:三联书店,2019.
    [17]
    胡晓艺. 中国古代自然观的演进及其对人类文明新形态的意义[J]. 大连干部学刊,2021,37(11):54-58.
    [18]
    习近平. 在联合国生物多样性峰会上的讲话[N]. 人民日报,2020-10-01(02).
    [19]
    蒙克. 现代政治思想史——从霍布斯到马克思 [M]. 周保巍,译,上海:上海人民出版社,2022.
    [20]
    麦卡锡. 马克思与古人 [M]. 王文杨,译. 上海:华东师范大学出版社,2011.
    [21]
    罗荣渠. 东亚崛起的现代历史意义与21世纪前景[J]. 天津社会科学,1992(2):4-8.
    [22]
    潘萌,刘际昕. 论中国式现代化的世界意义[J]. 北京科技大学学报(社会科学版),2023,39(1):57-63.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (744) PDF downloads(22) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return