Is the Concept of Ethics an HPC Concept?

WANG Yiwen

doi:10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022120096

Volume 41 Issue 1

Feb. 2025

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Article Navigation > Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition) > 2025 > 41(1): 129-136

WANG Yiwen. Is the Concept of Ethics an HPC Concept?[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2025, 41(1): 129-136. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022120096

Citation:

WANG Yiwen. Is the Concept of Ethics an HPC Concept?[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2025, 41(1): 129-136. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022120096

Citation:

PDF( 839 KB)

Is the Concept of Ethics an HPC Concept?-A Brief Discussion on Thick Ethical Concept and Naturalization of Ethical Concept

doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022120096

WANG Yiwen

School of Philosophy, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872, China

Received Date: 2022-12-30
Publish Date: 2025-02-01

Abstract

Abstract

The relationship between moral concept and natural concept is an important topic in meta-ethics, and the argument of open question is one of the classic arguments of non-naturalistic position. From the perspective of HPC theory, ethical classes and natural classes are both homeostatic attribute cluster types, and ethical concepts have the same definition structure as natural concepts, so moral naturalism avoids the “naturalistic fallacy”. There should be a causal relationship between the intrinsic attributes of HPC terms, but two thought experiments on the concept of “good” prove that the concept of “good” is not suitable for inductive reasoning, which means that the concept of “good” is difficult to have the necessary conditions to become a HPC concept. Thick ethical concepts are more likely to become HPC terms because of their rich descriptive content. This paper tries to define the thick ethical concept as HPC concept and determine its clustering properties in order to maintain the naturalness of some ethical concepts.
- HPC concept,
- thick concept,
- moral naturalistic realism

FullText(HTML)

References(22)

References

[1]	摩尔. 伦理学原理[M]. 长河,译. 上海:上海人民出版社,2005.
[2]	BOYD R. Realism,anti-foundationalism and the enthusiasm for natural kinds [J]. Philosophical Studies,1991,66(1/2):127-148.
[3]	BOYD R. How to be a moral realist [C]// Geoffrey S. Essays on Moral Realism. New York:Cornell University Press,1989:181-228.
[4]	MARTÍNEZ M. Informationally-connected property clusters,and polymorphism [J]. Biology & Philosophy,2015,30(1):99-117.
[5]	MALLON R. The Construction of Human Kinds [M]. New York:Oxford University Press,2016.
[6]	陈明益. 自然类研究进展[J]. 哲学动态,2016(4):99-104.
[7]	MAGNUS P D. NK ≠ HPC [J]. The Philosophical Quarterly,2014,64(256):471-477. doi: 10.1093/pq/pqu010
[8]	BOYD R. Homeostasis,species and higher taxa [C] //WILSON R A. Species:New Interdisciplinary Essays. Cambridge:The MIT Press,1999:141-185.
[9]	严世清. 论语义发生学理论的哲学涵义[J]. 北京科技大学学报(社会科学版),2024(2):70-77.
[10]	KORNBLITH H. Inductive Inference and its Natural Ground [M]. Cambridge:MIT Press,1993.
[11]	CRAVER C F. Mechanisms and natural kinds [J]. Philosophical Psychology,2009,22(5):575-594. doi: 10.1080/09515080903238930
[12]	RUBIN M. Is goodness a homeostatic property cluster? [J]. Ethics,2008(3):496-528.
[13]	威廉斯. 伦理学与哲学的限度[M]. 陈嘉映,译. 北京:商务印书馆,2017.
[14]	TAPPOLET C. Through thick and thin:good and its determinates [J]. Dialectica,2005,58(2):207-221. doi: 10.1111/j.1746-8361.2004.tb00297.x
[15]	常建华. 婚姻内外的古代女性[M]. 北京:中华书局,2006.
[16]	贾飞. 中国古代贞节观的变迁与女性财产权[J]. 江西社会科学,2016(2):125-130.
[17]	亓学太. 道德的自然主义实在基础——康奈尔道德自然主义探微[J]. 哲学动态,2011(6):69-75.
[18]	BOYD R. Finite beings,finite goods:The semantics,metaphysics and ethics of naturalist [J]. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research,2003,66(3):505-553. doi: 10.1111/j.1933-1592.2003.tb00278.x
[19]	陈明益. 自然类的认知解释及其困境[J]. 科学技术哲学研究,2022,39(6):23-29.
[20]	ONISHI Y & SERPICO D. Homeostatic property cluster theory without homeostatic mechanisms:Two recent attempts and their costs [J]. Journal for General Philosophy of Science,2022,53(1):61-82. doi: 10.1007/s10838-020-09527-1
[21]	庞金友. 早期文明语境中的道德与法律:基于政治文化的比较视角[J]. 北京科技大学学报(社会科学版),2012,28(2):59-65. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-2689.2012.02.010
[22]	马克思,恩格斯. 马克思恩格斯文集(第一卷)[M]. 北京:人民出版社,2009.

Relative Articles

[1]	WU Suwei, GUO Ying. Gestural Representation of Vertical Metaphor of Moral Concept in Chinese[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2023, 39(5): 574-582. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022080042
[2]	FENG Jun. Kant's Redefinition of Concept[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 36(6): 103-112.
[3]	BAO Da-wei. The Deconstruction and Reconstruction of Politics in the Communist Manifesto[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2019, 35(6): 80-87.
[4]	LIU Xiang-dong. Revisiting the Concept of Register from the Perspective of Typology[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 34(3): 49-56.
[5]	WANG Zheng-xun, CHENG Jie. An Analysis of the Concept of Extremism[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2017, 33(5): 77-85.
[6]	HE Zi-ran. The Conversion of Conceptual Structures in Pragmatics-oriented C-E Translation[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2015, 31(6): 1-6.
[7]	ZHANG Rui. A Comparison between Conceptual Metaphors in Chinese and English Sayings of Life[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2012, 28(2): 42-50.
[8]	HOU Jian-bo, SUN Jing-yi. Conceptual Metaphor and Ideology: Based on the Study of H1N1 Discourse[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2011, 27(2): 33-38.
[9]	WANG Guang. Liang Shuming's Interpretation of Western Political Conceptions[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2011, 27(4): 169-172.
[10]	ZHANG Kai-jun. Review on the Concept of Consequential Offense——Comparative Analysis on a Neglected Basic Conception of Criminal[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2010, 26(2): 92-96.
[11]	ZHAN Zhi-gang. The Conception of Consent and Its Political Implication[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2010, 26(1): 133-137.
[12]	PEI Li-fang, XU Hong-wei. A Critical Review of Definitions and Frameworks of New Venture Creation[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2010, 26(4): 102-109,126.
[13]	CHEN Yong-qiang, JIANG Lin. Study on Integration Management Concept Model for Large Construction Projects[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2009, 25(1): 19-23.
[14]	WANG Hong-zhe, SHI Yan. Adequate: The Core Words of Housing Rights[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2007, 23(4): 83-87.
[15]	WANG Chuan-li. Four angles of view in Analyzing the Concept of Corruption[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2004, 20(3): 18-22.
[16]	FENG Ying. The Explanation of YAN Fu's Definition about Liberty[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2002, 18(4): 57-60.