Volume 40 Issue 3
Apr.  2024
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Abstract
References
Article Navigation >  Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition)  > 2024  >  40(3): 78-88
LIU Lihua, MENG Fanrong. Discourse Representation of China’s Targeted Poverty Alleviation in African Media from the Perspective of Appraisal Theory[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2024, 40(3): 78-88. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022110039
Citation: LIU Lihua, MENG Fanrong. Discourse Representation of China’s Targeted Poverty Alleviation in African Media from the Perspective of Appraisal Theory[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2024, 40(3): 78-88. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022110039
shu

Discourse Representation of China’s Targeted Poverty Alleviation in African Media from the Perspective of Appraisal Theory

doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022110039

  • School of Foreign Languages, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China

  • Received Date: 2022-11-09
  • Publish Date: 2024-04-19
    Abstract
  • Under the framework of appraisal theory, this study specifically examines discourse representation of China’s practice of targeted poverty alleviation in African mainstream media. It is found in this research that African media have an overall positive attitude toward China’s targeted poverty alleviation. Among the three types of attitude resources, judgment resources are mostly used, followed by appreciation attitudinal resources and affect resources. As for the affect resources, security/insecurity resources are the most numerous, and for judgment resources, social esteem resources far exceed social sanction resources. Among appreciation resources, valuation resources far exceed both reaction and composition. In terms of the appraiser, African media mainly express their own views and attitudes directly, but also borrow views from the Chinese government, the Chinese people, foreign experts and scholars, and other countries to support and supplement the point of view. As for the appraised, the Chinese government is the mostly appraised, followed by the evaluation of poverty alleviation measures, poverty alleviation achievements, and the Communist Party of China. In addition, the discourse of African media indicates a kind of appreciation and agreement of the spirit and ability of the Communist Party of China, the Chinese government and the Chinese people in fighting poverty, and a kind of recognition of the social value and achievements of the targeted poverty alleviation in their news reports.

     

    • FullText(HTML)
    • References(22)
  • [1]
    管文虎. 国家的国际形象浅析[J]. 当代世界,2006(6):36-38. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-4206.2006.06.015
    [2]
    MARTIN J R. Beyond exchange:Appraisal system in English [C] // HUNSTON S & THOMPSON G. Evaluation in Text,Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse. Oxford:OUP,2000:142-175.
    [3]
    THOMSON E A,WHITE P R R & KITLEY P. “Objectivity” and “hard news” reporting across cultures:comparing the news report in English,French,Japanese and Indonesian journalism [J]. Journalism Studies,2008,9(2):212-228. doi: 10.1080/14616700701848261
    [4]
    MARTIN J R & ROSE D. Working with Discourse:Meaning beyond the Clause [M]. New York:Continuum,2003.
    [5]
    MARTIN J R & WHITE P R R. The Language of Evaluation:Appraisal in English [M]. Basingstoke:Palgrave Macmillan,2008.
    [6]
    BIROT S. Evaluation in media reporting:A comparative analysis in BBC,CNN and AI Jazeera reports [D]. Liverpool:Department of English Language and Literature,University of Liverpool,2008.
    [7]
    CHALIMAH C. Evaluating attitudes in news text:appraisal in critical discourse study Evaluating attitudes in news text:Appraisal in critical discourse study[C] // Fourth Prasasti International Seminar on Linguistics. Prasasti:Atlantis Press,2018:54-59.
    [8]
    SABAO C. Arguments for an appraisal linguistic discourse approach to the analysis of “objectivity” in “hard” news reports [J]. African Journalism Studies, 2016,37(1):40-63. doi: 10.1080/23743670.2015.1095776
    [9]
    ENGELBRECHT A. An appraisal theory approach to news reports on rhino poaching in South Africa [J]. Language Matters, 2020,51(1):86-112. doi: 10.1080/10228195.2019.1701266
    [10]
    刘世生,刘立华. 评价研究视角下的话语分析[J]. 清华大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2012,27(2):134-141,160.
    [11]
    马嫣. 从态度系统看美国主流媒体对中国经济形象的构建 ——一项基于语料库的批评话语研究[J]. 浙江师范大学学报(社会科学版),2015,40(3):101-107.
    [12]
    钱建伟,LAW R. 基于评价理论介入系统的积极话语分析——以关于中国游客的评论性新闻报道为例[J]. 广西社会科学,2016(6):167-171. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-6917.2016.06.034
    [13]
    董丹. 评价理论视角下意大利主流媒体对十九大报道的积极话语分析[J]. 外国语文,2019,35(4):17-23. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-6414.2019.04.003
    [14]
    蒋国东,陈许. 对外新闻中的“一带一路”——评价理论介入系统下的话语分析[J]. 外语研究,2017,34(5):6-9.
    [15]
    吴让越,赵小晶. 评价理论视域下的和谐话语体系对外传播研究[J]. 外语学刊,2022(2):36-41.
    [16]
    邱晴. 新闻话语的构建、预设及站位——评价系统视角下的新闻报道[J]. 江西社会科学,2015,35(4):236-241.
    [17]
    郇昌鹏. 新闻价值研究的话语分析视角[J]. 当代外语研究,2016(5):45-51,94.
    [18]
    房红梅. 论评价理论对系统功能语言学的发展[J]. 现代外语,2014,37(3):303-311,437.
    [19]
    JAKAZA E & VISSER M. “Subjectivity” in newspaper reports on “controversial” and “emotional” debates:an appraisal and controversy analysis [J]. Language Matters, 2016,47(1):3-21. doi: 10.1080/10228195.2015.1060513
    [20]
    刘文宇,毛伟伟. 非洲报纸媒体中中国形象的语料库辅助话语分析[J]. 外语研究,2020,37(2):9-15,55.
    [21]
    程实,王勇. 韩礼德系统功能语言学的马克思主义观[J]. 北京科技大学学报(社会科学版),2023,39(6):722-728.
    [22]
    李洪峰. 中国国家形象在非洲的构建与传播:挑战与应对[J]. 对外传播,2021(3):27-31.
    • Relative Articles

  • Relative Articles

    [1]ZHANG Nan, PENG Hailong, XU Chenyi. The Communication Landscape of China’s Environmental Issues on International Social Media[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2025, 41(4): 98-108. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2025020062
    [2]KUANG Zhan, SUN Luo. A Study on Evaluation Resources in Psychiatrist’s Discourse on Diagnosis and Therapy from Ecolinguistics[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2024, 40(4): 83-93. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2023010052
    [3]ZHU Yong-hua, ZHU Lei. Identity Construction of Young Medical Workers under the Epidemic[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2022, 38(1): 51-58. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2021040054
    [4]WANG Qin. The New-media Communication of the Medical Scientific Popularization Discourse—From CGA Perspective[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 36(5): 17-24.
    [5]ZHANG Jian-xiu, LI Guo-qing. An Analysis and Discussion on Retranslation of Classics from the Perspective of Functional Linguistics[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 36(2): 38-46.
    [6]MEI Xiong-jie, LI Zhi-feng, WU Lan-ping. Evaluation Index System of College Teachers' Engineering Expertise: From the Perspective of Embeddedness Theory[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2019, 35(5): 63-69.
    [7]LIU Shu-xin. Construction of China Image: Harmonious Discourse Analysis[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2019, 35(4): 38-45.
    [8]YANG Yang. A Contrastive Study of Employment of Engagement Resources between Chinese and English Scientific Research Articles[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2019, 35(6): 34-41.
    [9]XU Wen-tao. Discourse Analysis of Feelings in Song Lyrics under the Appraisal Theory[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2019, 35(4): 16-22.
    [10]YUAN Ying. The Ecological Approach of Media Reports: An Ecological Discourse Analysis of the BBC News Headlines about China Haze[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 34(4): 33-41.
    [11]DONG Tian-mei. Evaluation of China’s Foreign Aid Policy towards Africa[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 34(1): 101-111.
    [12]SHI Xiao-yun. Contrastive Analysis of Discursive Representations of One Belt One Road Initiative by Foreign Media—A Corpus-based Semantic Prosody Study[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 34(1): 18-25.
    [14]ZHAO Yong-gang. A Study of the Evolution of the Chinese Image Represented by Time Magazine from the Perspective of Appraisal Theory[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2017, 33(5): 49-61.
    [15]SONG Fang-cheng. A Combined Functional Approach to Emotive Communication: Drawing on Interpersonal Pragmatics and Appraisal Theory[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2017, 33(5): 36-42.
    [16]LIU Cheng-yu, RAN Qi. Attitudinal Resources in Customers'Remarks in CSC and Their Impacts on Potential Customers'Purchase Decisions[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2017, 33(6): 1-7.
    [17]ZHANG Wei, LI Jing. Appraisal Interpretation of Aesthetic Values in Chinese Ancient Poems: A Case Study of English Translation of Chaitoufeng[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2016, 32(2): 1-7.
    [18]LIU Yong-hou. Address Variation and Attitudinal Evaluation[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2013, 29(3): 21-26.
    [19]ZHANG Ti-kun. Discourse Construction and Theory Interpretation of Chinese Liberalism Literature——And Criticism of Some Extensive Liberalism Tendencies[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2010, 26(2): 24-29.
    [20]CHENG Wei. Positive Discourse Analysis: Harmonious Attitudinal Prosody——A Study of Chinese Tour Guide Commentary[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2010, 26(2): 113-118.
    • Supplements(0)
    • Cited By

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(4)

    1. 郑洁，袁传有. 语篇语义视域下涉外警务应急救援沟通话语研究. 中国人民警察大学学报. 2024(08): 33-41 .
    2. 孙野. 基于评价理论的泰国媒体中的成都城市形象研究——以《曼谷邮报》为例. 文化创新比较研究. 2024(24): 60-63+150 .
    3. 廉莹，罗峥，沈浩，马宁，董雪璠. 数据驱动融合与创新：新闻传播学领域大数据研究综述（2013年-2023年）. 信息传播研究. 2024(06): 24-41 .
    4. 张振克，景义博，蒋文嘉. 国内外非洲贫困研究述评. 中国非洲学刊. 2024(04): 121-140+145 .

    Other cited types(0)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-042025-052025-060102030405060
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 12.6 %FULLTEXT: 12.6 %META: 83.1 %META: 83.1 %PDF: 4.3 %PDF: 4.3 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 5.6 %其他: 5.6 %其他: 0.5 %其他: 0.5 %Arlington: 0.1 %Arlington: 0.1 %Springfield: 0.6 %Springfield: 0.6 %三明: 0.2 %三明: 0.2 %上海: 1.7 %上海: 1.7 %中山: 0.1 %中山: 0.1 %丽水: 2.9 %丽水: 2.9 %六安: 0.1 %六安: 0.1 %包头: 0.2 %包头: 0.2 %北京: 2.5 %北京: 2.5 %南京: 1.1 %南京: 1.1 %南平: 0.4 %南平: 0.4 %南昌: 0.1 %南昌: 0.1 %南通: 0.6 %南通: 0.6 %厦门: 0.3 %厦门: 0.3 %台州: 1.1 %台州: 1.1 %合肥: 0.2 %合肥: 0.2 %吉林: 0.5 %吉林: 0.5 %呼和浩特: 0.1 %呼和浩特: 0.1 %咸阳: 1.0 %咸阳: 1.0 %哥伦布: 0.4 %哥伦布: 0.4 %嘉兴: 1.2 %嘉兴: 1.2 %大连: 0.8 %大连: 0.8 %天津: 1.3 %天津: 1.3 %太原: 0.1 %太原: 0.1 %宁德: 0.4 %宁德: 0.4 %宁波: 0.7 %宁波: 0.7 %安康: 0.3 %安康: 0.3 %宜春: 0.2 %宜春: 0.2 %宣城: 0.4 %宣城: 0.4 %宿迁: 0.4 %宿迁: 0.4 %常德: 0.2 %常德: 0.2 %广元: 0.4 %广元: 0.4 %广州: 1.3 %广州: 1.3 %延安: 0.1 %延安: 0.1 %张家口: 1.3 %张家口: 1.3 %徐州: 1.0 %徐州: 1.0 %德州: 0.1 %德州: 0.1 %成都: 0.1 %成都: 0.1 %扬州: 1.0 %扬州: 1.0 %抚州: 1.3 %抚州: 1.3 %新加坡: 0.7 %新加坡: 0.7 %无锡: 1.1 %无锡: 1.1 %日照: 0.2 %日照: 0.2 %昆明: 0.7 %昆明: 0.7 %昭通: 0.1 %昭通: 0.1 %曼谷: 0.1 %曼谷: 0.1 %朝阳: 0.5 %朝阳: 0.5 %杭州: 1.7 %杭州: 1.7 %枣庄: 0.2 %枣庄: 0.2 %格兰特县: 0.2 %格兰特县: 0.2 %榆林: 0.7 %榆林: 0.7 %武汉: 0.5 %武汉: 0.5 %汕头: 0.4 %汕头: 0.4 %江门: 0.1 %江门: 0.1 %池州: 0.2 %池州: 0.2 %沃思堡: 0.3 %沃思堡: 0.3 %沈阳: 0.6 %沈阳: 0.6 %泰州: 0.2 %泰州: 0.2 %泸州: 0.2 %泸州: 0.2 %洛阳: 0.1 %洛阳: 0.1 %济南: 0.2 %济南: 0.2 %济宁: 0.4 %济宁: 0.4 %济源: 0.1 %济源: 0.1 %海东: 0.1 %海东: 0.1 %海西: 0.1 %海西: 0.1 %淮安: 0.3 %淮安: 0.3 %温州: 1.0 %温州: 1.0 %渭南: 0.8 %渭南: 0.8 %湖州: 1.1 %湖州: 1.1 %湘西: 0.8 %湘西: 0.8 %漯河: 1.8 %漯河: 1.8 %漳州: 0.6 %漳州: 0.6 %烟台: 0.2 %烟台: 0.2 %珠海: 0.3 %珠海: 0.3 %盐城: 0.6 %盐城: 0.6 %盘锦: 0.2 %盘锦: 0.2 %石家庄: 0.8 %石家庄: 0.8 %福州: 0.6 %福州: 0.6 %秦皇岛: 0.1 %秦皇岛: 0.1 %纽约: 0.2 %纽约: 0.2 %绍兴: 0.6 %绍兴: 0.6 %绵阳: 0.1 %绵阳: 0.1 %舟山: 0.3 %舟山: 0.3 %芒廷维尤: 15.9 %芒廷维尤: 15.9 %芝加哥: 0.3 %芝加哥: 0.3 %苏州: 0.3 %苏州: 0.3 %荆州: 0.2 %荆州: 0.2 %荆门: 0.5 %荆门: 0.5 %莆田: 0.3 %莆田: 0.3 %营口: 0.3 %营口: 0.3 %衡阳: 0.1 %衡阳: 0.1 %衢州: 0.2 %衢州: 0.2 %襄阳: 0.3 %襄阳: 0.3 %西宁: 9.8 %西宁: 9.8 %西安: 0.6 %西安: 0.6 %辽阳: 0.1 %辽阳: 0.1 %连云港: 0.2 %连云港: 0.2 %通化: 0.1 %通化: 0.1 %邯郸: 0.3 %邯郸: 0.3 %邵阳: 0.5 %邵阳: 0.5 %郑州: 6.1 %郑州: 6.1 %郴州: 0.7 %郴州: 0.7 %重庆: 0.8 %重庆: 0.8 %金华: 0.2 %金华: 0.2 %铁岭: 1.1 %铁岭: 1.1 %银川: 0.4 %银川: 0.4 %锦州: 0.3 %锦州: 0.3 %镇江: 0.3 %镇江: 0.3 %长春: 0.1 %长春: 0.1 %长沙: 0.8 %长沙: 0.8 %阳泉: 0.1 %阳泉: 0.1 %阿什本: 0.6 %阿什本: 0.6 %阿德莱德: 0.2 %阿德莱德: 0.2 %随州: 0.2 %随州: 0.2 %雅安: 0.5 %雅安: 0.5 %青岛: 0.1 %青岛: 0.1 %鞍山: 1.9 %鞍山: 1.9 %香港: 0.1 %香港: 0.1 %鹰潭: 0.1 %鹰潭: 0.1 %黄冈: 0.4 %黄冈: 0.4 %黄南: 0.3 %黄南: 0.3 %黄石: 0.3 %黄石: 0.3 %其他其他ArlingtonSpringfield三明上海中山丽水六安包头北京南京南平南昌南通厦门台州合肥吉林呼和浩特咸阳哥伦布嘉兴大连天津太原宁德宁波安康宜春宣城宿迁常德广元广州延安张家口徐州德州成都扬州抚州新加坡无锡日照昆明昭通曼谷朝阳杭州枣庄格兰特县榆林武汉汕头江门池州沃思堡沈阳泰州泸州洛阳济南济宁济源海东海西淮安温州渭南湖州湘西漯河漳州烟台珠海盐城盘锦石家庄福州秦皇岛纽约绍兴绵阳舟山芒廷维尤芝加哥苏州荆州荆门莆田营口衡阳衢州襄阳西宁西安辽阳连云港通化邯郸邵阳郑州郴州重庆金华铁岭银川锦州镇江长春长沙阳泉阿什本阿德莱德随州雅安青岛鞍山香港鹰潭黄冈黄南黄石

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Tables(8)

    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML

    Article Metrics

    Article views (781) PDF downloads(42) Cited by(4)
    Proportional views
    Related

    Copyright © Journal of Univeraity of Science and Technology Beijing.京ICP备13030111号

    Address：Room 305, Library, 30 Xueyuan Road, Haidian District, Beijing (100083)   website：https://bkds.ustb.edu.cn/   Tel：010-62334089

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co. Ltd    

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return