WU Yuan-zheng, FENG De-zheng. The Attitudinal Meaning and Value Construction in Multimodal Ecological Discourse[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2022, 38(6): 677-684. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022100139
Citation: WU Yuan-zheng, FENG De-zheng. The Attitudinal Meaning and Value Construction in Multimodal Ecological Discourse[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2022, 38(6): 677-684. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022100139

The Attitudinal Meaning and Value Construction in Multimodal Ecological Discourse-A Case Study of Environmental Public Service Advertisements

doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022100139
  • Received Date: 2021-10-31
    Available Online: 2022-11-21
  • Publish Date: 2022-12-05
  • In the era of digital media, the ecological discourse increasingly relies on multimodal resources such as image and sound. Therefore, this study integrates the appraisal system and visual grammar, and proposes a multimodal analytical framework based on attitudinal meaning and oriented towards ecological value construction. Our case study of environmental public service advertisements analyzes the use of attitude resources and their multimodal realizations. The analysis shows that public service advertisements utilize the emotionalization strategy to establish emotional linkages between individuals and the ecological environment, the moralization strategy to emphasize human responsibility and their proactiveness in environmental protection, and the rationalization strategy to highlight the seriousness of environmental problems and the importance of natural resources. The findings suggest that the use of the three strategies highlights the ecological value and altruistic value and downplays the egoistic value, thus constructing the Marxist harmonious ecological philosophy that human beings and nature coexist and belong to a community with shared ecological destiny. This ecological value not only meets the social needs of promoting ecological civilization and constructing a community with shared ecological destiny, but also can effectively guide the public to understand and fulfill ecological concepts.

     

  • [1]
    辛志英,黄国文. 系统功能语言学与生态话语分析[J]. 外语教学,2013,34(3):7-10,31.
    [2]
    黄国文, 陈旸. 生态哲学与话语的生态分析[J]. 外国语文, 32(6): 55-61.
    [3]
    KRESS G & VAN LEEUWEN T. Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design (2nd ed.) [M]. London: Routledge, 2006.
    [4]
    Feng D. Analyzing multimodal Chinese discourse: Integrating social semiotic and conceptual metaphor theories [C] // Shei, C. The Routledge Handbook of Chinese Discourse Analysis. New York: Routledge, 2019: 65-81.
    [5]
    HANSEN A & MACHIN D. Visually branding the environment:Climate change as a marketing opportunity [J]. Discourse Studies, 2008, 10(6):777-794. doi: 10.1177/1461445608098200
    [6]
    苗兴伟,雷蕾. 基于系统功能语言学的生态话语分析[J]. 山东外语教学,2019(1):13-22.
    [7]
    STIBBE A. Ecolinguistics: Language, Ecology and the Stories We Live By [M]. London, New York: Routledge, 2021.
    [8]
    雷蕾,苗兴伟. 生态话语分析中的生态哲学观研究[J]. 外语学刊,2020(3):120-123.
    [9]
    何伟,魏榕. 国际生态话语之及物性分析模式构建[J]. 现代外语,2017,40(5):597-607,729.
    [10]
    何伟,耿芳. 英汉环境保护公益广告话语之生态性对比分析[J]. 外语电化教学,2018(4):57-63.
    [11]
    戴桂玉,仇娟. 语言、环境、社会−生态酒店英文简介之生态批判性话语分析[J]. 外语与外语教学,2012(1):48-52.
    [12]
    曹进,赵盼. 基于情态系统的网络语言生态话语分析−以微博的情感类网络语篇为例[J]. 重庆第二师范学院学报,2021,34(05):4-45, 66, 127.
    [13]
    杨阳. 系统功能视角下新闻报道的生态话语分析[J]. 北京第二外国语学院学报,2018(1):33-45.
    [14]
    李淑晶,刘承宇. 基于评价系统的生态话语分析−以特朗普退出《巴黎气候协定的演讲为例[J]. 外语与外语教学,2020(5):65-76,149.
    [15]
    BEDNAREK M & CAPLE H. Playing with environmental stories in the news—good or bad practice? [J]. Discourse & Communication, 2010, 4(1):5-31.
    [16]
    MARTIN J R & WHITE P P R. The Language of Evaluation [M]. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005.
    [17]
    CHAN K & CHANG C. Advertising to Chinese youth:A study of public service ads in Hong Kong [J]. Qualitative Market Research:An International Journal, 2013, 16(4):421-435. doi: 10.1108/QMR-06-2013-0042
    [18]
    RICE R & ATKIN C. Public Communication Campaigns (4th ed.) [M]. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. 2013.
    [19]
    冯德正,亓玉杰. 态度意义的多模态建构−基于认知评价理论的分析模式[J]. 现代外语,2014,37(5):585-96,729.
    [20]
    YZER M C,SOUTHWELL B G & STEPHENSON M T. Inducing fear as a public communication campaign strategy [J]. Public Communication Campaigns, 2012(4):163-176.
    [21]
    YU M H M, FENG D W & UNSWORTH L. Infusing Pro-Environmental Values in Science Education: A Multimodal Analysis of Ecology Animations for Children [C] // UNSWORTH L. Learning from Animations in Science Education. Springer, 2020: 55-74.
    [22]
    KOTLER P & LEE N. Social Marketing: Influencing Behaviors for Good [M]. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2008.
    [23]
    BATOR R J & CIALDINI R B. The application of Persuasion Theory to the development of effective pro-environmental public service announcements [J]. Journal of Social Issues, 2000, 56(3):527-542. doi: 10.1111/0022-4537.00182
    [24]
    KEEL A & NATARAAJAN R. Celebrity endorsements and beyond:New avenues for celebrity branding [J]. Psychology & Marketing, 2012, 29(9):690-703.
    [25]
    BRACE-GOVAN J. More diversity than celebrity:A typology of role model interaction [J]. Journal of Social Marketing, 2013, 3(2):111-126. doi: 10.1108/JSOCM-05-2012-0079
    [26]
    STERN P C & DIETZ T. The value basis of environmental concern [J]. Journal of Social Issues, 1994, 50(3):65-84. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4560.1994.tb02420.x
    [27]
    王学俭,宫长瑞. 试析马克思主义生态文明观及其当代意蕴[J]. 理论探讨,2010(2):25-28.
    [28]
    杨晶. 赢得国际话语权:中国生态文明建设的全球视野与现实策略[J]. 马克思主义与现实,2020(3):83-89.
  • Relative Articles

    [1]LI Bingnan, SUN Yi. Multimodal Ecological Concept Construction of Only One World[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2023, 39(5): 563-573. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2023030033
    [2]JIN Shangran, JIANG Ting, ZHANG Hui. Attitudinal Meanings of Chinese Insect Vernacular Names from the Perspective of Ternary Interactive Language Niche[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2023, 39(6): 729-738. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022100061
    [3]YU Hui, SONG Jin-ge. A Multimodal Approach to the Social Semiotic Construction of Ecological Meanings in Children’s Picture Book[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2022, 38(6): 667-676. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022100067
    [4]HUANG Fang, ZENG Lei. The Attitudinal Meaning of Nature Writing Discourse and Its Interpretation in Historical Context:A Case Study on “The Land Ethic” in A Sand County Almanac[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2022, 38(3): 264-271. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2021120077
    [5]ZENG Lei, ZHU Xin-yu. The Realization of Ideational Meaning of Multimodal Projection in Sinology Comics[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 36(6): 1-9.
    [6]ZHAO Xiu-feng, LIU Chang. A Comparative Study of Energy White Papers between China and Britain from the Perspective of International Ecological Discourse[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 36(6): 17-25.
    [7]HAN Ying. Media Literacy Education Based on Multiliteracies Theory[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2019, 35(3): 49-55.
    [8]XIAO Hao-zhang, YANG Ying-ying. An Eco-analysis of the Multimodal Effects in China's EFL Education[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 34(6): 1-9.
    [9]TANG Lei. The Application of a Spoken Language Corpus Based on Information Embodied in Conversations: Practical Use and Evaluation of Attributes and Multimodal Information[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 34(6): 64-71.
    [10]CHANG Jun-fang, CONG Ying-xu. A Multi-stratal Pattern of Ecological Discourse Analysis from a Systemic Functional Perspective: A Case Study on the Speech of China’s Minister of Environment Protection[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 34(4): 27-32.
    [11]XIAO Hao-zhang, LIU Yu-ting. The Effects of Audio and Video Modalities on Business English Majors'Listening Comprehension[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2017, 33(6): 19-24.
    [12]LIANG Xiao-hui, SUN Kai-meng. A Cognitive Multimodal Teaching Model for Writing of English Expository Articles: Color Terms[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2016, 32(5): 14-22.
    [13]HUANG Li-he. Situated Discourse and Multimodal Studies: Significance, Theory and Methodology[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2016, 32(5): 29-36.
    [14]ZHAO Xiu-feng, LI Xiao-wei. The Multimodal Metonymic Construction of Emotion in The Rainbow of Time: A Perspective of Cognitive Poetics[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2014, 30(6): 1-7,58.
    [15]ZHOU Qi-feng. Analysis of Image-Text Relations in English Picture Book and Its Implications With Little Red Riding Hood as an Example[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2014, 30(5): 22-27.
    [16]YANG Xin-zhang. Text-image Relations in Learner's English-Chinese Dictionaries[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2012, 28(4): 45-51.
    [17]TANG Qing-ye. The Multimodal Representation of Poverty[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2012, 28(4): 60-66.
    [18]LI Li. Paraphrasing Humor in Multi-modality[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2012, 28(4): 52-59.
    [19]PENG Yi, YANG Hai-yan. The Construal of the Integrative Meaning of Multimodal Commercial Advertising Discourse[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2010, 26(4): 1-6.
    [20]CHEN Yu-min. Multimodal Construal of Appraisal: A Case Study of Olympics Television Public Service Advertising[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2008, 24(3): 108-114.
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(2)

    1. 何伟,田怡. 生态语言学视角下中法国际汉语教材对比研究. 北京科技大学学报(社会科学版). 2024(05): 65-73 .
    2. 吴素伟,郭滢. 汉语道德概念垂直空间隐喻的手势表征. 北京科技大学学报(社会科学版). 2023(05): 574-582 .

    Other cited types(7)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-042025-052025-062025-07020406080100
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 28.4 %FULLTEXT: 28.4 %META: 65.4 %META: 65.4 %PDF: 6.2 %PDF: 6.2 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 8.2 %其他: 8.2 %其他: 0.2 %其他: 0.2 %Central District: 0.3 %Central District: 0.3 %Kao-sung: 0.1 %Kao-sung: 0.1 %Osaka: 0.2 %Osaka: 0.2 %Rochester: 0.1 %Rochester: 0.1 %Seattle: 1.8 %Seattle: 1.8 %Springfield: 0.2 %Springfield: 0.2 %Wan Chai: 0.1 %Wan Chai: 0.1 %[]: 0.2 %[]: 0.2 %上海: 1.6 %上海: 1.6 %东莞: 0.6 %东莞: 0.6 %临沂: 0.1 %临沂: 0.1 %乌鲁木齐: 0.2 %乌鲁木齐: 0.2 %九江: 0.1 %九江: 0.1 %佛山: 0.2 %佛山: 0.2 %保定: 0.1 %保定: 0.1 %八打灵再也: 0.1 %八打灵再也: 0.1 %兰州: 0.1 %兰州: 0.1 %北京: 2.7 %北京: 2.7 %十堰: 0.8 %十堰: 0.8 %华盛顿州: 0.2 %华盛顿州: 0.2 %南京: 0.3 %南京: 0.3 %南宁: 0.2 %南宁: 0.2 %南昌: 0.5 %南昌: 0.5 %南通: 0.2 %南通: 0.2 %台北: 0.2 %台北: 0.2 %台州: 0.1 %台州: 0.1 %合肥: 0.4 %合肥: 0.4 %哈尔滨: 0.2 %哈尔滨: 0.2 %哥伦布: 0.2 %哥伦布: 0.2 %嘉兴: 0.3 %嘉兴: 0.3 %天水围: 0.1 %天水围: 0.1 %天津: 1.9 %天津: 1.9 %太原: 0.2 %太原: 0.2 %宁波: 0.1 %宁波: 0.1 %官坑: 0.2 %官坑: 0.2 %宣城: 0.7 %宣城: 0.7 %常州: 0.6 %常州: 0.6 %平顶山: 0.2 %平顶山: 0.2 %广州: 0.9 %广州: 0.9 %弗吉尼亚州: 0.4 %弗吉尼亚州: 0.4 %张家口: 2.8 %张家口: 2.8 %怒江: 0.2 %怒江: 0.2 %惠州: 0.3 %惠州: 0.3 %扬州: 1.9 %扬州: 1.9 %新乡: 0.2 %新乡: 0.2 %新奥尔良: 0.6 %新奥尔良: 0.6 %日照: 0.1 %日照: 0.1 %昆明: 0.7 %昆明: 0.7 %杭州: 1.2 %杭州: 1.2 %柏林: 0.3 %柏林: 0.3 %株洲: 0.1 %株洲: 0.1 %格兰特县: 0.2 %格兰特县: 0.2 %桂林: 0.2 %桂林: 0.2 %梅利托波尔: 0.2 %梅利托波尔: 0.2 %武汉: 1.6 %武汉: 1.6 %泉州: 0.1 %泉州: 0.1 %洛阳: 0.2 %洛阳: 0.2 %济南: 0.2 %济南: 0.2 %淄博: 0.1 %淄博: 0.1 %深圳: 0.2 %深圳: 0.2 %温州: 1.1 %温州: 1.1 %湛江: 0.1 %湛江: 0.1 %漯河: 5.3 %漯河: 5.3 %烟台: 0.1 %烟台: 0.1 %珠海: 0.6 %珠海: 0.6 %石家庄: 2.1 %石家庄: 2.1 %福州: 0.5 %福州: 0.5 %纽约: 0.2 %纽约: 0.2 %芒廷维尤: 19.8 %芒廷维尤: 19.8 %芜湖: 0.1 %芜湖: 0.1 %芝加哥: 0.9 %芝加哥: 0.9 %苏州: 0.2 %苏州: 0.2 %莱芜: 0.1 %莱芜: 0.1 %衡阳: 0.1 %衡阳: 0.1 %襄阳: 0.2 %襄阳: 0.2 %西宁: 19.6 %西宁: 19.6 %西安: 0.2 %西安: 0.2 %贵阳: 0.2 %贵阳: 0.2 %邯郸: 0.9 %邯郸: 0.9 %郑州: 7.5 %郑州: 7.5 %重庆: 0.2 %重庆: 0.2 %铜陵: 0.1 %铜陵: 0.1 %银川: 0.5 %银川: 0.5 %长春: 0.2 %长春: 0.2 %长沙: 1.3 %长沙: 1.3 %阿姆斯特丹: 0.1 %阿姆斯特丹: 0.1 %雅加达: 0.1 %雅加达: 0.1 %青岛: 0.2 %青岛: 0.2 %香港: 0.3 %香港: 0.3 %马鞍山: 0.2 %马鞍山: 0.2 %其他其他Central DistrictKao-sungOsakaRochesterSeattleSpringfieldWan Chai[]上海东莞临沂乌鲁木齐九江佛山保定八打灵再也兰州北京十堰华盛顿州南京南宁南昌南通台北台州合肥哈尔滨哥伦布嘉兴天水围天津太原宁波官坑宣城常州平顶山广州弗吉尼亚州张家口怒江惠州扬州新乡新奥尔良日照昆明杭州柏林株洲格兰特县桂林梅利托波尔武汉泉州洛阳济南淄博深圳温州湛江漯河烟台珠海石家庄福州纽约芒廷维尤芜湖芝加哥苏州莱芜衡阳襄阳西宁西安贵阳邯郸郑州重庆铜陵银川长春长沙阿姆斯特丹雅加达青岛香港马鞍山

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(1)  / Tables(1)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (807) PDF downloads(77) Cited by(9)
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return