A Contrastive Study of Disciplinary Knowledge-building from the Perspective of Multimodality

ZHOU Jin-you

doi:10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022100079

Volume 38 Issue 6

Dec. 2022

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition) > 2022 > 38(6): 685-694

ZHOU Jin-you. A Contrastive Study of Disciplinary Knowledge-building from the Perspective of Multimodality[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2022, 38(6): 685-694. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022100079

Citation:

ZHOU Jin-you. A Contrastive Study of Disciplinary Knowledge-building from the Perspective of Multimodality[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2022, 38(6): 685-694. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022100079

Citation:

PDF( 1011 KB)

A Contrastive Study of Disciplinary Knowledge-building from the Perspective of Multimodality

doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022100079

ZHOU Jin-you

School of Foreign Languages, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou 646000, China

Received Date: 2022-10-17
Available Online: 2022-11-21
Publish Date: 2022-12-05

Abstract

Abstract

Although compulsory education textbooks widely use multimodal texts to build disciplinary knowledge, the essence of how textbooks realize knowledge-building has not yet been fully explained. The study of multimodal texts by functional linguistics reveals the mode of how human beings convey experiential knowledge through transitivity processes, which informs the exploration of the disciplinary knowledge construction, along with the theoretical support and practical guidance of textbook compilation. Based on this, this study adopts the combination of qualitative and quantitative methods, selects 72 multimodal texts from Mathematics and Physics textbooks of compulsory education published by People’s Education Press, and discusses the patterns by which textbooks use multimodal resources to realize knowledge-building. The findings reveal that there are similarities and differences of knowledge-building patterns in different disciplinary textbooks. To be specific, for the transitivity processes in verbal mode, their distribution is similar and realizing forms converge; for those in visual mode, their distribution is quite different and visual structures diverge; for those in the interaction of both modes, there are only three types of intersemiotic parallel.
- Mathematics textbooks,
- Physics textbooks,
- transitivity processes,
- knowledge-building

FullText(HTML)

References(27)

References

[1]	JONASSEN D, PECK K & WILSON B. Learning with Technology: A Constructivist Perspective [M]. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 1999.
[2]	JONASSEN D & HENNING P. Mental models:Knowledge in the head and knowledge in the world [J]. Educational Technology, 1999(3):37-42.
[3]	TAM M. Constuctivism,instructional design,and technology:Implications for transforming distance learning [J]. Educational Technology & Society, 2000(2):50-60.
[4]	MATON K. Making semantic waves:A key to cumulative knowledge-building [J]. Linguistics and Education, 2013, 24(1):8-22. doi: 10.1016/j.linged.2012.11.005
[5]	MATON K. Knowledge and Knowers: Towards a Realist Sociology of Education [M]. London, New York: Routledge, 2014.
[6]	汤斌. Maton的合理化语码理论与系统功能语言学的合作[J]. 现代外语, 2014（1）: 52-61
[7]	ZHAO Q. Knowledge Building in Physics Textbooks in Primary and Secondary Schools [M]. Xiamen: Xiamen University Press, 2013.
[8]	DORAN Y J. The Discourse of Physics: Building Knowledge through Language, Mathematics and Image [M]. London, New York: Routledge, 2018.
[9]	O’HALLORAN K L. Mathematical Discourse: Language, Symbolism and Visual Images [M]. London, New York: Continuum, 2005.
[10]	JONES J. Multiliteracies for Academic Purposes: A Metafunctional Exploration of Inter-semiosis and Multimodality in University Textbook and Computer-based Learning Resources in Science [D]. Sydney: University of Sydney, 2006.
[11]	MARTIN J R. Revisiting field: Specialized knowledge in secondary school science and humanities discourse [C] // MARTIN J R, MATON K & DORAN Y J. Accessing Academic Discourse: Systemic Functional Linguistics and Legitimate Code Theory. London, New York: Routledge, 2020: 114-147.
[12]	HOOD S. Live lectures: The significance of presence in building disciplinary knowledge [C] // MARTIN J R, MATON K & DORAN Y J. Accessing Academic Discourse: Systemic Functional Linguistics and Legitimate Code Theory. London, New York: Routledge, 2020: 211-235.
[13]	王琴. 外语数字教材的多模态符号设计研究−以《人文英语》为例[J]. 北京科技大学学报,2021(2):154-159.
[14]	MARTIN J R. English Text: System and Structure [M]. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 1992.
[15]	ROYCE T. Visual-verbal Intersemiotic Complementarity in The Economist Magazine [D]. Reading: University of Reading, 1999.
[16]	MARTINEC R & SALWAY A. A system for image–text relations in new (and old) media [J]. Visual Communication, 2005, 4(3):337-371. doi: 10.1177/1470357205055928
[17]	KRESS G & van LEEUWEN T V. Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design （3rd ed.） [M]. London, New York: Routledge, 2021.
[18]	UNSWORTH L. Multimodal Semiotics: Functional Analysis in Contexts of Education [C]. London: Continuum, 2008.
[19]	PAINTER C, MARTIN J R & UNSWORTH L. Reading Visual Narratives: Image Analysis of Children’s Picture Books [M]. London: Equinox, 2013.
[20]	ROYCE T. Synergy on the page:Exploring intersemiotic complementarity in page-based multimodal text [J]. JASFL Occasional Papers, 1998(1):25-49.
[21]	HALLIDAY M A K. An Introduction to Functional Grammar （2nd ed.） [M]. London: Edward Arnold, 1994.
[22]	HALLIDAY M A K & MATTHIESSEN C. Halliday’s Introduction to Functional Grammar [M]. London, New York: Routledge, 2014.
[23]	杨延宁. 汉语语法隐喻研究[M]. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2020.
[24]	LIU Y & O’HALLORAN K L. Inter-semiotic texture:Analyzing cohesive devices between language and images [J]. Social Semiotics, 2009(4):367-388.
[25]	HALLIDAY M A K & HASAN R. Cohesion in English [M]. London: Longman, 1976.
[26]	HALLDAY M A K & McDONALD E. Metafunctional profile of the grammar of Chinese [C] // CAFFAREL A, MARTIN J R & MATTHIESSEN C. Language Typology: A Functional Perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2004: 305-396.
[27]	石高峰,杨彩影. 汉语动词句法框架信息加工机制及二语习得研究[J]. 语言教学与研究,2021(1):33-43. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0257-9448.2021.01.004