Attitudinal Meanings of Chinese Insect Vernacular Names from the Perspective of Ternary Interactive Language Niche

JIN Shangran; JIANG Ting; ZHANG Hui

doi:10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022100061

Volume 39 Issue 6

Dec. 2023

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition) > 2023 > 39(6): 729-738

JIN Shangran, JIANG Ting, ZHANG Hui. Attitudinal Meanings of Chinese Insect Vernacular Names from the Perspective of Ternary Interactive Language Niche[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2023, 39(6): 729-738. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022100061

Citation:

JIN Shangran, JIANG Ting, ZHANG Hui. Attitudinal Meanings of Chinese Insect Vernacular Names from the Perspective of Ternary Interactive Language Niche[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2023, 39(6): 729-738. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022100061

Citation:

PDF( 1113 KB)

Attitudinal Meanings of Chinese Insect Vernacular Names from the Perspective of Ternary Interactive Language Niche

doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022100061

1.
Institute of Corpus Studies and Applications, Shanghai International Studies University, Shanghai 201620, China
2.
School of Foreign Languages and Cultures, Chongqing University, Chongqing 401331, China
3.
School of Foreign Languages, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai 200240, China

Received Date: 2022-10-14
Available Online: 2023-10-11
Publish Date: 2023-12-25

Abstract

Abstract

As Chinese folk appellations, Chinese insect vernacular names are formed in the interaction between embodied cognition and the realistic environment, and are endowed with strong attitudinal meanings that mirror and construct the interdependence of insects, humans and the environment. Focusing on 37 Chinese vernacular names of ladybugs and 30 names of cockroaches collected from the BCC corpus, dictionaries, classics and insect writings, this study builds a ternary interactive language niche based on the ternary interaction of “reality-cognition-language” and language niche, so as to analyze the implicit attitudes, cognitive mechanisms and environmental factors of the Chinese vernacular names of the two, with the ultimate aim of revealing their ecological attributes based on the ecosophy of “ecological aesthetics”. The study concludes that appreciation resources within the Chinese vernacular names of ladybugs and cockroaches rank at the top, and the cognitive mechanisms and environmental factors that influence the formation of their names result in different attitudinal values. Ladybug names tend to have positive or neutral potentials, while cockroach names tend to be negative or neutral. As for the ecological connotations and attributes embedded in their names, metonymic names under the influence of natural factors are full of ecologically beneficial aesthetic wisdom, while some metaphorical and metaphtonymic names under social or cultural factors betray to some extent ecological aesthetic ecosophy, thus being ecologically ambivalent or destructive. This article provides intriguing insights into human-insect relationships based on Chinese insect vernacular names. It is conducive to reconstructing people’s cognition of insects and promoting ecological naming practices.
- insect names,
- attitudinal meaning,
- ternary interaction,
- niche,
- ecosophy

FullText(HTML)

References(56)

References

[1]	陈晦. 英汉植物名理据及生态观对比分析[J]. 西安外国语大学学报,2014(3):1-4,25. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-9876.2014.03.001
[2]	王兴隆,陈淑梅. 《尔雅·释虫》名物词理据探微[J]. 徐州师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2007(3):65-69.
[3]	赵奎英. 从生态语言学批评看“生态”与“环境”之辨[J]. 厦门大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2013(5):9-19.
[4]	GIBBS W W. On the termination of species [J]. Scientific American, 2001(5):40-49.
[5]	DUNAYER J. Animal Equality: Language and Liberation[M]. Derwood, MD: Ryce Publishing, 2001.
[6]	谭耀庚,赵敬钊. 浅淡中英文昆虫名称与文化[J]. 昆虫知识,2003(1):93-95.
[7]	张巨武. 英汉语言中动物词语的对比[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(社会科学版),2008(3):134-136.
[8]	GOATLY A. Humans,animals,and metaphors [J]. Society & Animals, 2006(1):15-37.
[9]	SOMMER R & SOMMER B A. Zoomorphy:Animal metaphors for human personality [J]. Anthrozoos: A Multidisciplinary Journal of the Interactions of People and Animals, 2011(3):237-248.
[10]	叶琼琼,陈丹璐. 徐志摩诗歌的动物意象隐喻及其生态观研究[J]. 江汉论坛,2020(11):78-83.
[11]	朱长河. 认知语言学与生态语言学的结合−以词汇系统为例的可行性分析[J]. 四川外语学院学报,2008(2):18-22.
[12]	王寅. 认知生态语言学初探[J]. 中国外语,2018(2):22-30.
[13]	宋健楠. 引发态度的语义特征新释[J]. 外语教学,2019(4):40-44.
[14]	宋健楠. 认知隐喻学畛域中情感评价的体验−人际共轭促生理据疏义[J]. 外语研究,2016(2):46-51.
[15]	王馥芳. 生态语言学和认知语言学的相互借鉴[J]. 中国外语,2017(5):47-55.
[16]	CROFT W & CRUSE D A. Cognitive Linguistics [M]. Cambridge: CUP, 2004.
[17]	彭宣维. 汉英评价意义分析手册——评价语料库的语料处理原则与研制方案[M]. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2015.
[18]	MARTIN J R & WHITE P R R. The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English [M]. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005.
[19]	MACKEN-HORARIK M & ISAAC A. Appraising appraisal [C] // THOMPSON G & ALBA-JUEZ L. Evaluation in Context. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2014: 67-92.
[20]	冯德正,亓玉杰. 态度意义的多模态建构−基于认知评价理论的分析模式[J]. 现代外语,2014(5):585-596,792.
[21]	LAKOFF G & JOHNSON M. Metaphors We Live By [M]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1980.
[22]	RADDEN G. How metonymic are metaphors? [C] // GIRVEN R & PÖRINGS R. Metaphor and Metonymy in Comparison and Contrast. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 2003: 407-434.
[23]	陈睿. 生态语言学视域下山西面食名称的认知理据研究[J]. 吉首大学学报(社会科学版),2018(S2):207-209.
[24]	LITTLEMORE J. Metonymy: Hidden Shortcuts in Language, Thought and Communication [M]. Cambridge: CUP, 2015.
[25]	刘飞飞,常晨光. 报纸社论中作者-潜在受众联合关系话语建构策略−系统功能语言学个性化视角[J]. 北京科技大学学报(社会科学版),2022,38(1):44-50.
[26]	潘震. 情感传译的隐转喻识解[J]. 外语教学与研究,2013(5):754-765,801.
[27]	何伟,魏榕. 多元和谐,交互共生−国际生态话语分析之生态哲学观建构[J]. 外语学刊,2018(6):28-35.
[28]	李文蓓. 基于语言生态学的语言生态位研究[J]. 外国语言文学,2018(5):482-491.
[29]	刘世铸. 评价的语言学特征[J]. 山东外语教学,2007(3):11-16. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2643.2007.03.003
[30]	李国正. 生态汉语学[M]. 长春: 吉林教育出版社, 1991.
[31]	DRENGSON A. The life and work of Arne Naess:An appreciative overview [J]. The Trumpeter:Journal of Ecosophy, 2005(1):5-60.
[32]	STIBBE A. Ecolinguistics: Language, Ecology and the Stories We Live By [M]. London: Routledge, 2015.
[33]	LARSON B. Metaphors for Environmental Sustainability: Redefining Our Relationship with Nature [M]. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2011.
[34]	HUANG G & ZHAO R. Harmonious discourse analysis:Approaching peoples’ problems in a Chinese context [J]. Language Sciences, 2021, 85:101365. doi: 10.1016/j.langsci.2021.101365
[35]	谭晶华. 生态审美视域下的《云雀之歌》再探[J]. 外语与外语教学,2021(3):130-138,151.
[36]	肖朗. 天人合一与生态美学−兼从现象学视角看中国生态美学智慧[J]. 郑州大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2019(4):9-13,158.
[37]	虞国跃. 瓢虫瓢虫[M]. 北京: 化学工业出版社, 2008.
[38]	黄国文,陈旸. 生态哲学与话语的生态分析[J]. 外国语文,2016(6):55-61.
[39]	王天翼,王寅. 命名转喻观−以石钟山命名为例[J]. 外语教学,2017(4):12-17.
[40]	何伟,耿芳. 英汉环境保护公益广告话语之生态性对比分析[J]. 外语电化教学,2018(4):57-63.
[41]	KÖVECSES Z & RADDEN G. Metonymy:Developing a cognitive linguistic view [J]. Cognitive Linguistics, 1998(1):37-77.
[42]	LAKOFF G & JOHNSON M. Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and Its Challenge to Western Thought [M]. New York: Basic Books, 1999.
[43]	隋荣谊,李锋平. 从审美移情出发固推文学翻译中的翻译美学理论[J]. 外语与外语教学,2009(8):54-57.
[44]	LAKOFF G. Why it matters how we frame the environment [J]. Environmental Communication, 2010(1):70-81.
[45]	李战子. 评价与文化模式[J]. 山东外语教学,2004(2):3-8. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2643.2004.02.001
[46]	许宁云. 隐喻与象征关系的认知符号学阐释[J]. 社会科学家,2010(7):158-161.
[47]	李荣. 现代汉语方言大词典·武汉方言词典[M]. 南京: 江苏教育出版社, 2002.
[48]	李海霞. 汉语动物命名原则[J]. 殷都学刊,2000(2):92-95.
[49]	吴承笃. 返身于物与多元共生−生态语言的生态性反思[J]. 南京社会科学,2019(8):121-125,138.
[50]	MÜHLHÄUSLER P. Linguistic Ecology: Language Change and Linguistic Imperialism in the Pacific Region [M]. London: Routledge, 1996.
[51]	高芳. 论颜色词汇的文化内涵[J]. 河南大学学报(社会科学版),2006(6):167-172.
[52]	王建. 中国文化中的避讳[J]. 贵州社会科学,1997(3):77-81. doi: 10.13713/j.cnki.cssci.1997.03.017
[53]	ZHOU W & CHEN D. Sociochemosensory and emotional functions [J]. Psychological Science, 2009(9):1118-1124.
[54]	佘正荣. 中国生态伦理传统与现代西方环境伦理学思维方式之比较[J]. 鄱阳湖学刊,2011(1):95-103.
[55]	刘金明. 当代隐喻理论与经验主义认知观[J]. 湖南科技大学学报(社会科学版),2004(4):109-113.
[56]	何伟,马子杰. 生态语言学视角下的评价系统[J]. 外国语(上海外国语大学学报),2020,43(1):48-58.