CHEN Yu-min, XU Ya-shan. The Functional Semantic Orientation of Systemic Functional Linguistics: Viewed from the History of Functional Grammar[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2023, 39(1): 90-98. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022090097
Citation: CHEN Yu-min, XU Ya-shan. The Functional Semantic Orientation of Systemic Functional Linguistics: Viewed from the History of Functional Grammar[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2023, 39(1): 90-98. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022090097

The Functional Semantic Orientation of Systemic Functional Linguistics: Viewed from the History of Functional Grammar

doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022090097
  • Received Date: 2022-10-06
    Available Online: 2022-12-22
  • Publish Date: 2023-01-05
  • Functional Grammar is the essential component of Systematic Functional Linguistics (SFL). Functional Grammar has been growing in a functional-based and meaning-oriented fashion, which endows SFL with great potential in the wide-ranged application. Halliday set out to develop Functional Grammar by combining the functional approach to linguistic study from Prague School and the meaning-oriented view of language from London School, which constantly contributed to its meaning orientation in the theoretical construction hereafter. As a necessary step to building a semantic-oriented grammar theory, the exploration of language functions was in turn facilitated by social semiotics. The latest Functional Grammar is a clear display of the ecological features of human language as a social semiotic system.

     

  • [1]
    黄国文. 作为普通语言学的系统功能语言学[J]. 中国外语,2007,4(5):14-19. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9382.2007.05.003
    [2]
    胡壮麟. 韩礼德学术思想的中国渊源和回归[M]. 北京: 外语教学与研究出版社, 2018.
    [3]
    陈瑜敏,黄国文. 系统功能语言学中的“意义”[J]. 外语教学,2016,37(5):11-14. doi: 10.16362/j.cnki.cn61-1023/h.2016.05.003
    [4]
    辛志英,黄国文. 系统功能普通语言学发展五十年回顾[J]. 外语教学,2011,32(4):22-26,84. doi: 10.16362/j.cnki.cn61-1023/h.2011.04.011
    [5]
    MATTHIESSEN C M I M. Ideas and new directions [C] // HALLIDAY M A K & WEBSTER J. Continuum Companion to Systemic Functional Linguistics. London; New York: Continuum, 2009: 12-58.
    [6]
    张德禄. 系统功能语言学60年发展趋势探索[J]. 外语教学与研究,2018,50(1):37-48,160.
    [7]
    黄国文. 系统功能语言学研究中的整合[J]. 中国外语,2009,6(1):17-23. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9382.2009.01.005
    [8]
    严辰松. 功能主义语言学说略[J]. 解放军外语学院学报,1997(6):1-7.
    [9]
    胡壮麟. 系统功能语言学的社会语言学渊源[J]. 北京科技大学学报(社会科学版),2008,24(2):92-97. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-2689.2008.02.018
    [10]
    HALLIDAY M A K. Options and functions in the English clause [C] // WEBSTER J. Studies in English Language, Volume 7 in the Collected Works of M. A. K. Halliday. London; New York: Continuum, 1969/2005: 154-163.
    [11]
    BÜHLER K. Theory of Language: The Representational Function of Language [M]. GOODWIN D F & ESCHBACH A (trans). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 2011.
    [12]
    钱军. Vilém Mathesius与布拉格学派[J]. 外国语言文学,2018,35(6):561-571.
    [13]
    MATHESIUS V. Functional linguistics [C] // VACHEK J & DUŠKOVá L. Praguiana: Some Basic and Less Known Aspects of the Prague Linguistic School. Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 1983: 121-142.
    [14]
    钱军. 马泰修斯及其语言理论[J]. 外语教学与研究,1994(2):57-61,80.
    [15]
    戚雨村. 布拉格学派和马泰休斯的语言理论[J]. 外国语(上海外国语学院学报),1993(5):51-56,12.
    [16]
    HALLIDAY M A K. An Introduction to Functional Grammar (2nd ed.) [M]. London: Arnold /Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press, 1994/2000.
    [17]
    MALINOWSKI B. The problem of meaning in primitive languages [C] // OGDEN C K & RICHARDS I A. The Meaning of Meaning: a Study of the Influence of Language upon Thought and the Science of Symbolism. London: Routledge; Kegan Paul, 1923.
    [18]
    封宗信. 现代语言学流派概论 [M]. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2018.
    [19]
    王宗炎. 伦敦学派奠基人弗斯的语言理论[J]. 国外语言学,1980(5):1-8.
    [20]
    HALLIDAY M A K. Grammar, society and noun [C]//WEBSTER J. On Language and Linguistics, Volume 3 in the Collected Works of M. A. K. Halliday. London; New York: Continuum, 1966/2003: 50-73.
    [21]
    HALLIDAY M A K. Notes on transitivity and theme:Part 1 [J]. Journal of Linguistics, 1967, 3(1):37-81. doi: 10.1017/S0022226700012949
    [22]
    HALLIDAY M A K. Notes on transitivity and theme:Part 2 [J]. Journal of Linguistics, 1967, 3(2):199-244. doi: 10.1017/S0022226700016613
    [23]
    HALLIDAY M A K. Notes on transitivity and theme:Part 3 [J]. Journal of Linguistics, 1968, 4(2):179-215. doi: 10.1017/S0022226700001882
    [24]
    HALLIDAY M A K. Functional diversity in language, as seen from a consideration of modality and mood in English [C]// WEBSTER J. Studies in English Language, Volume 7 in the Collected Works of M. A. K. Halliday. London; New York: Continuum, 1970/2005: 164-204.
    [25]
    HALLIDAY M A K. Language structure and language function [C] // WEBSTER J. On Grammar, Volume 1 in the Collected Works of M. A. K. Halliday. London; New York: Continuum, 1970/2002: 173-195.
    [26]
    HALLIDAY M A K. The functional basis of language [C] // WEBSTER J. On Language and Linguistics, Volume 3 in the Collected Works of M. A. K. Halliday. London; New York: Continuum. 1973/2003: 298-322.
    [27]
    HALLIDAY M A K. A Sociosemiotic perspective on language development [C] // WEBSTER J. The Language of Early Childhood, Volume 4 in the Collected Works of M. A. K. Halliday. London; New York: Continuum. 1974/2004: 90-112.
    [28]
    HALLIDAY M A K. Learning how to mean [C] //WEBSTER J. The Language of Early Childhood, Volume 4 in the Collected Works of M. A. K. Halliday. London; New York: Continuum, 1975/2004: 28-59.
    [29]
    HALLIDAY M A K. Language as Social Semiotic: The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning [M]. Baltimore, MD: University Park Press, 1978.
    [30]
    HALLIDAY M A K. Introduction: On the “architecture” of human language [C] // WEBSTER J. On Language and Linguistics, Volume 3 in the Collected Works of M. A. K. Halliday. London; New York: Continuum, 2003: 1-29.
    [31]
    HALLIDAY M A K. Modes of meaning and modes of expression: types of grammatical structure and their determination by different semantic functions [C] // WEBSTER J. On Grammar, Volume 1 in the Collected Works of M. A. K. Halliday. London; New York: Continuum, 1970/2002: 196-218.
    [32]
    HALLIDAY M A K. The notion of “context” in language education [C] // GHADESSY M. Text and Context in Functional Linguistics. Philadelphia: Benjamins, 1999: 1-24.
    [33]
    HALLIDAY M A K. An Introduction to Functional Grammar [M]. London: Arnold, 1985.
    [34]
    HALLIDAY M A K & MATTHIESSEN C M I M. An Introduction to Functional Grammar (3rd ed.) [M]. London: Arnold, 2004.
    [35]
    HALLIDAY M A K & MATTHIESSEN C M I M. Halliday’s Introduction to Functional Grammar (4th ed.) [M]. London; New York: Routledge, 2014.
    [36]
    董晓明,林正军. 《韩礼德的功能语法导论》(第四版)述评[J]. 当代外语研究,2016(2):88-90.
    [37]
    HALLIDAY M A K. The tones of English [J]. Archivum Linguisticum, 1963, 15(1):1-28.
    [38]
    HALLIDAY M A K. Intonation in English grammar [J]. Transactions of the Philological Society, 1963, 62(1):143-169. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-968X.1963.tb01003.x
    [39]
    沈洁明. 韩礼德的《功能语法导论》[J]. 外国语(上海外国语学院学报),1986(6):78-79.
    [40]
    HALLIDAY M A K. 功能语法导论(第二版)[M]. 彭宣维, 赵秀凤, 张征, 等译. 北京: 外语教学与研究出版社, 2010.
    [41]
    苗兴伟. 《功能语法导论》(汉译本)评介[J]. 中国外语教育,2011,4(1):62-65,68.
    [42]
    MATTHIESSEN C M I M. Multisemiotic and context-based register typology: registerial variation in the complementarity of semiotic systems [C] // VENTOLA E & GUIJARRO A J M. The World Shown and the World Told. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009: 11-38.
    [43]
    EGGINS S. An Introduction to Systemic Functional Linguistics (2nd ed. ) [M]. London: Continuum, 2004.
    [44]
    MARTIN J R & WHITE P R R. The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English [M]. London: Palgrave, 2005.
    [45]
    黄国文,张培佳. 系统功能语言学的性质、特点及发展[J]. 现代外语,2020,43(5):601-611.
  • Relative Articles

    [1]GAO Shengwen. On the Ideological Construction of University Journal from the Perspective of Systemic Functional Linguistics[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2024, 40(2): 112-118. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2023090061
    [2]HE Wei, ZHONG Wei. Reconsideration of the Taxis between Clauses within the Framework of Systemic Functional Linguistics[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2023, 39(4): 431-437. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2023030024
    [3]HUANG Guo-wen. What Is Systemic Functional Linguistics[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2023, 39(1): 73-89. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022100090
    [4]BAO Xing-jia, LUO Zai-bing. A Logogenetic Study of Negative Polarity in English Academic Discourse: A SFL Perspective[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2022, 38(5): 533-542. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022050035
    [5]YANG Lin-xiu. Appliability of Systemic Functional Linguistics in Evidential Studies[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2022, 38(5): 517-524. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022070063
    [6]XIANG Da-jun. On the Symbiotic Thinking in Systemic Functional Linguistics[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2022, 38(5): 525-532. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022050096
    [7]LIU Yan. Readability Studies from the Perspective of Systemic Functional Linguistics[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 36(3): 11-18,27.
    [8]CHEN Shu-kun, LIU Xuan. Functional Grammatical Analysis of Matter Prepositional Phrases:A Contrast between Sydney and Cardiff Models[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 36(4): 7-15.
    [9]HE Wei, WEI Rong. Review of Transitivity Studies within Systemic Functional Linguistics[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2016, 32(1): 1-20.
    [10]ZENG Lei, YANG Mu-wen. The Distinctness and Similarity of Projection in Visual Grammarand Functional Grammar[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2016, 32(6): 1-4,11.
    [11]LI Xue-ning, FAN Xin-ying. Research on the Know ledge Representation Method of Systemic Functional Linguistics[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2015, 31(3): 26-30.
    [12]CHEN Hai-ye, ZHI Hong. Interpretation of Hemingway’s “Iceberg” Theory from Perspective of Systemic Functional Appliable Linguistics: Exemplified with Killers[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2015, 31(5): 41-47.
    [13]HUI Zhang-zheng. Theory and Practice of History Discourse Analysis—from the Perspective of Systemic Functional Linguistics[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2015, 31(1): 33-38.
    [14]YU Chang-li, LUO Yi. Corpora-based SFL Contrastive Study on English Extended Numeratives and Chinese Numeral + Measure Configuration[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2014, 30(4): 37-45.
    [15]LI Zhong-hua. Research on Probability from a Systemic Functional Perspective[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2011, 27(3): 13-16.
    [16]CHANG Chen-guang, CHEN Yu-min. Systemic Functional Studies of Register[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2011, 27(3): 1-5.
    [17]GONG Zhang-hua. Genre Studies in Systemic Functional Linguistics[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2011, 27(3): 6-12.
    [18]HU Zhuang-lin. The Relation of Systemic Functional Linguistics to Sociolinguistics in Terms of Its Origin and Development[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2008, 24(2): 92-97.
    [19]HUANG Guo-wen. The Cardiff Grammar: a Model in Systemic Functional Linguistics[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2008, 24(1): 93-100.
    [20]HE Jun-wu, ZHANG Lei. Character and Function: Analysis on the Natural Law Theory of Spinoza[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2008, 24(1): 47-49,53.
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(2)

    1. 张敏. 系统功能语言学融入大学英语智慧课堂的策略研究. 吉林工程技术师范学院学报. 2024(02): 70-75 .
    2. 范敏,徐善文,赵生学. 系统功能语法视角下的英语新闻语篇的“言据性”研究. 佳木斯大学社会科学学报. 2023(02): 84-87 .

    Other cited types(3)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-042025-0501020304050
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 37.4 %FULLTEXT: 37.4 %META: 52.8 %META: 52.8 %PDF: 9.8 %PDF: 9.8 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 11.8 %其他: 11.8 %其他: 0.8 %其他: 0.8 %Rochester: 0.1 %Rochester: 0.1 %Seattle: 2.8 %Seattle: 2.8 %上海: 2.0 %上海: 2.0 %东京: 0.1 %东京: 0.1 %东方: 0.2 %东方: 0.2 %东莞: 3.4 %东莞: 3.4 %东营: 0.2 %东营: 0.2 %临汾: 0.1 %临汾: 0.1 %伦敦: 0.1 %伦敦: 0.1 %佛山: 0.2 %佛山: 0.2 %兰州: 0.4 %兰州: 0.4 %北京: 6.9 %北京: 6.9 %北海: 0.2 %北海: 0.2 %十堰: 0.2 %十堰: 0.2 %华盛顿州: 0.1 %华盛顿州: 0.1 %南京: 1.5 %南京: 1.5 %南昌: 0.6 %南昌: 0.6 %南通: 0.1 %南通: 0.1 %南阳: 0.3 %南阳: 0.3 %厦门: 0.1 %厦门: 0.1 %台州: 0.4 %台州: 0.4 %合肥: 0.3 %合肥: 0.3 %吉安: 0.1 %吉安: 0.1 %吕梁: 0.3 %吕梁: 0.3 %周口: 0.2 %周口: 0.2 %和田: 0.1 %和田: 0.1 %哈密: 0.1 %哈密: 0.1 %哈尔滨: 0.5 %哈尔滨: 0.5 %哥伦布: 0.2 %哥伦布: 0.2 %嘉兴: 0.1 %嘉兴: 0.1 %圣荷西: 0.1 %圣荷西: 0.1 %大连: 0.2 %大连: 0.2 %天津: 1.1 %天津: 1.1 %安康: 0.2 %安康: 0.2 %安阳: 0.1 %安阳: 0.1 %宜春: 0.1 %宜春: 0.1 %宣城: 0.6 %宣城: 0.6 %宿迁: 0.1 %宿迁: 0.1 %巴利亚多利德: 2.0 %巴利亚多利德: 2.0 %常州: 0.5 %常州: 0.5 %常德: 0.1 %常德: 0.1 %平顶山: 0.3 %平顶山: 0.3 %广州: 1.3 %广州: 1.3 %廊坊: 0.2 %廊坊: 0.2 %张家口: 0.9 %张家口: 0.9 %张掖: 0.7 %张掖: 0.7 %徐州: 0.1 %徐州: 0.1 %悉尼: 0.1 %悉尼: 0.1 %成都: 0.2 %成都: 0.2 %扬州: 0.2 %扬州: 0.2 %抚顺: 0.2 %抚顺: 0.2 %新奥尔良: 1.0 %新奥尔良: 1.0 %昆明: 0.8 %昆明: 0.8 %曲靖: 0.2 %曲靖: 0.2 %朝阳: 0.1 %朝阳: 0.1 %杭州: 1.4 %杭州: 1.4 %柳州: 0.1 %柳州: 0.1 %武汉: 0.5 %武汉: 0.5 %汕头: 0.1 %汕头: 0.1 %沈阳: 0.2 %沈阳: 0.2 %洛杉矶: 0.2 %洛杉矶: 0.2 %洛阳: 0.1 %洛阳: 0.1 %济南: 0.2 %济南: 0.2 %深圳: 0.5 %深圳: 0.5 %温州: 0.3 %温州: 0.3 %湖州: 0.2 %湖州: 0.2 %漯河: 2.1 %漯河: 2.1 %漳州: 0.2 %漳州: 0.2 %潮州: 0.1 %潮州: 0.1 %澳门: 0.6 %澳门: 0.6 %烟台: 0.1 %烟台: 0.1 %玉林: 0.1 %玉林: 0.1 %珠海: 0.2 %珠海: 0.2 %盘锦: 0.1 %盘锦: 0.1 %石家庄: 1.8 %石家庄: 1.8 %福州: 0.1 %福州: 0.1 %绵阳: 0.1 %绵阳: 0.1 %聊城: 0.1 %聊城: 0.1 %芒廷维尤: 15.1 %芒廷维尤: 15.1 %芝加哥: 0.6 %芝加哥: 0.6 %苏州: 0.1 %苏州: 0.1 %莆田: 0.1 %莆田: 0.1 %莫斯科: 0.4 %莫斯科: 0.4 %葵涌: 0.1 %葵涌: 0.1 %衡水: 0.2 %衡水: 0.2 %衢州: 0.2 %衢州: 0.2 %西宁: 21.8 %西宁: 21.8 %西安: 0.7 %西安: 0.7 %邢台: 0.3 %邢台: 0.3 %邯郸: 0.2 %邯郸: 0.2 %郑州: 0.3 %郑州: 0.3 %重庆: 0.8 %重庆: 0.8 %金华: 0.1 %金华: 0.1 %镇江: 0.1 %镇江: 0.1 %长春: 0.3 %长春: 0.3 %长沙: 2.4 %长沙: 2.4 %阜新: 0.1 %阜新: 0.1 %阜阳: 0.2 %阜阳: 0.2 %阿什本: 0.2 %阿什本: 0.2 %阿姆斯特丹: 0.1 %阿姆斯特丹: 0.1 %随州: 0.1 %随州: 0.1 %青岛: 0.5 %青岛: 0.5 %鞍山: 0.1 %鞍山: 0.1 %首尔特别: 0.1 %首尔特别: 0.1 %马鞍山: 0.1 %马鞍山: 0.1 %黄冈: 0.1 %黄冈: 0.1 %黄石: 0.1 %黄石: 0.1 %龙岩: 0.1 %龙岩: 0.1 %其他其他RochesterSeattle上海东京东方东莞东营临汾伦敦佛山兰州北京北海十堰华盛顿州南京南昌南通南阳厦门台州合肥吉安吕梁周口和田哈密哈尔滨哥伦布嘉兴圣荷西大连天津安康安阳宜春宣城宿迁巴利亚多利德常州常德平顶山广州廊坊张家口张掖徐州悉尼成都扬州抚顺新奥尔良昆明曲靖朝阳杭州柳州武汉汕头沈阳洛杉矶洛阳济南深圳温州湖州漯河漳州潮州澳门烟台玉林珠海盘锦石家庄福州绵阳聊城芒廷维尤芝加哥苏州莆田莫斯科葵涌衡水衢州西宁西安邢台邯郸郑州重庆金华镇江长春长沙阜新阜阳阿什本阿姆斯特丹随州青岛鞍山首尔特别马鞍山黄冈黄石龙岩

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (574) PDF downloads(107) Cited by(5)
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return