Actor Network Analysis on the Construction of Big Science Innovation System in China

HUANG Zhen-yu

doi:10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022070086

Volume 39 Issue 2

Apr. 2023

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition) > 2023 > 39(2): 203-210

HUANG Zhen-yu. Actor Network Analysis on the Construction of Big Science Innovation System in China[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2023, 39(2): 203-210. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022070086

Citation:

HUANG Zhen-yu. Actor Network Analysis on the Construction of Big Science Innovation System in China[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2023, 39(2): 203-210. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022070086

Citation:

PDF( 1085 KB)

Actor Network Analysis on the Construction of Big Science Innovation System in China

doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022070086

HUANG Zhen-yu

School of Public Administration and Humanities, Dalian Maritime University, Dalian 116026, China

Received Date: 2022-07-27
Publish Date: 2023-04-25

Abstract

Abstract

This study analyzes the construction of big science innovation system (BISI) in China based on the theoretical framework of actor network. The government, in its interaction with the big science infrastructure, identifies the BISI with the technology function of the big science infrastructure, and thus becomes the key actor in the construction of the BISI. The main actors in the construction of BISI are composed of scientific research institutes, universities, enterprises, and big science infrastructure. However, different from other actors, enterprises under the current translation strategy have not accepted recruitment and mobilization, thus leaving the construction of actor network unfinished. The study also recommends that the government needs to explore and formulate science and technology policies to both afford the risks of enterprise participation and cultivate the technological capabilities of enterprises, to make enterprises become active actors in the construction of BISI.
- big science innovation system,
- actor network,
- technology function,
- structuration

FullText(HTML)

References(31)

References

[1]	新华网. 中华人民共和国国民经济和社会发展第十四个五年规划和2035年远景目标纲要[EB/OL]. （2021-03-12）[2022-10-11]. http://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2021-03/13/content_5592681.htm.
[2]	张耀方. 综合性国家科学中心的内涵、功能与管理机制[J]. 中国科技论坛,2017(6):5-12.
[3]	王振旭,朱巍,张柳,等. 科技创新中心、综合性国家科学中心、科学城概念辨析及典型案例[J]. 科技中国,2019(1):48-52.
[4]	王贻芳,白云翔. 发展国家重大科技基础设施引领国际科技创新[J]. 管理世界,2020(5):172-188,17. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-5502.2020.05.013
[5]	张玲玲,付赛际,张秋柳,等. 以大科学装置为依托的高科技园区管控模式分析及对策建议−以中子科学城为例[J]. 科技进步与对策,2019(15):14-23.
[6]	黄振羽. 基于大科学设施的创新生态系统建设−“雨林模型”与演化交易成本视角[J]. 科技进步与对策,2019(19):9-16. doi: 10.6049/kjjbydc.2019010189
[7]	肖新军,张治河,易兰. 试论创新系统的客观性[J]. 科研管理,2021(2):64-76.
[8]	路风. 冲破迷雾−揭开中国高铁技术进步之源[J]. 管理世界,2019(9):164-194,200. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-5502.2019.09.013
[9]	吴莹,卢雨霞,陈家建,等. 跟随行动者重组社会−读拉图尔的《重组社会:行动者网络理论》[J]. 社会学研究,2008(2):218-234.
[10]	刘文旋. 从知识的建构到事实的建构−对布鲁诺·拉图尔“行动者网络理论”的一种考察[J]. 哲学研究,2017(5):118-125.
[11]	布鲁诺·拉图尔. 科学在行动: 怎样在社会中跟随科学家和工程师[M]. 刘文旋, 郑开, 译. 北京: 东方出版社, 2005.
[12]	郭荣茂. 转译社会学视角下的技术治理研究[J]. 科学学研究,2016(11):1608-1614. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-2053.2016.11.002
[13]	CALLON M. Some elements of a sociology of translation: domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St Brieuc Bay [C] // LAW J （ed.） . Power, Action and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge? London: Routledge Kegan & Paul, 1986, 196–223.
[14]	SHIM Y & SHIN D H. Analyzing China’s fintech Industry from the perspective of actor–network theory [J]. Telecommunications Policy, 2016, 40(2-3):168-181. doi: 10.1016/j.telpol.2015.11.005
[15]	SHIN D H. Application of actor-network theory to network neutrality in Korea:Socio-ecological understanding of network dynamics [J]. Telematics & Informatics, 2016, 33(2):436-451.
[16]	HAUGE A M. Situated valuations:affordances of management technologies in organizations [J]. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 2018, 34(3):245-255. doi: 10.1016/j.scaman.2018.06.001
[17]	MARKUS M L & SILVER M S. A foundation for the study of IT effects:a new look at deSanctis and poole’s concepts of structural features and spirit [J]. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 2008, 9(10):609-632. doi: 10.17705/1jais.00176
[18]	LEONARDI P M. Theoretical foundations for the study of sociomateriality [J]. Information and Organization, 2013, 23(2):59-76. doi: 10.1016/j.infoandorg.2013.02.002
[19]	HULTIN L & MÄHRING M. Visualizing institutional logics in sociomaterial practices [J]. Information & Organization, 2014, 24(3):29-155.
[20]	侯和爽. 我国大科学装置产业链构建与ITER计划[J]. 现代企业,2019(4):38-39. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-9671.2019.04.020
[21]	张玲玲,白雪,王蝶,等. 依托大科学装置进行产业化的关键因素研究[J]. 科技促进发展,2018(9):817-825. doi: 10.11842/chips.2018.09.001
[22]	褚怡春,杨永华,高翔. 重大科技基础设施建设对提升高校创新能力的作用[J]. 中国高校科技,2017(5):18-20.
[23]	黄振羽, 丁云龙. 大科学工程组织的治理结构与治理策略研究[M]. 哈尔滨: 哈尔滨工业大学出版社, 2016.
[24]	黄振羽. 论大科学装置集群的技术可供性[J]. 工程研究-跨学科视野中的工程,2019(3):265-271.
[25]	王贻芳. 建设国际领先的大科学装置奠定科技强国的基础[J]. 中国科学院院刊,2017(5):483-487.
[26]	葛焱,邹晖,周国栋. 国家重大科技基础设施的内涵、特征及建设流程[J]. 中国高校科技,2018(3):11-14. doi: 10.16209/j.cnki.cust.2018.03.003
[27]	张玲玲,赵道真,张秋柳. 依托大科学装置的产业化模式及其对策研究−以散裂中子源为例[J]. 科技进步与对策,2017(19):53-59.
[28]	原泉,何伟,申晨,等. 大科学装置合格供方管理模式探究[J]. 项目管理技术,2019(11):87-90. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-4313.2019.11.015
[29]	中国科学院大连化学物理研究所. 大连光源2019年年报[EB/OL]. （2020-04-14） [2022-06-15]. http://www.dcls.dicp.ac.cn/images/2019.docx.
[30]	MAZZUCATO M. From market fixing to market-creating:a new framework for innovation policy [J]. Industry & Innovation, 2016, 23(2):140-156.
[31]	PANAGIOTIS C & MATTHEW C. CERN meets industry at the big science business forum: the world’s first big science business forum gathered 18 of the most advanced big-science organisations together to meet European companies [EB/OL]. （2018-03-05）[2021-09-13]. https://home.cern/news/news/knowledge-sharing/cern-meets-industry-big-science-business-forum.