Three Dimensions and Domination Mode of Capital Logic: Based on the Study of <i>Das Kapital</i> and Its Manuscripts

ZHANG Zhao-yang

doi:10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022050048

Volume 38 Issue 6

Dec. 2022

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition) > 2022 > 38(6): 621-630

ZHANG Zhao-yang. Three Dimensions and Domination Mode of Capital Logic: Based on the Study of Das Kapital and Its Manuscripts[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2022, 38(6): 621-630. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022050048

Citation:

ZHANG Zhao-yang. Three Dimensions and Domination Mode of Capital Logic: Based on the Study of Das Kapital and Its Manuscripts[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2022, 38(6): 621-630. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022050048

Citation:

PDF( 938 KB)

Three Dimensions and Domination Mode of Capital Logic: Based on the Study of Das Kapital and Its Manuscripts

doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022050048

ZHANG Zhao-yang

School of Marxism, NanKai University, Tianjin 300350, China

Received Date: 2022-05-13
Available Online: 2022-11-11
Publish Date: 2022-12-05

Abstract

Abstract

The capital logic has been the focused area in Marxist research. To clarify the basic meaning of capital logic, we need to explore Das Kapital and its manuscripts by differentiating three concepts of “capital”, “logic” and “capital logic”. Capital is the dialectical unity of the object, proliferative value, and relations of production. Logic is the dialectical logic characterized with negativity and inevitability. Capital logic presents the inevitability of capital in the negative motion, which mainly contains three dimensions: The generalized trend of commodity production and commodity exchange in the dimension of object, the law of proliferation and accumulation of capital in the dimension of proliferative value, and the generalized trend of capital relation in the dimension of relations of production. In the process of modernization, the capital logic has realized its overall domination of modern society by dominating material production, shaping social relations and constructing ideas. Only the overall rule going beyond the capital logic can truly realize the liberation of human.
- capital logic,
- Das Kapital and its Manuscripts,
- three dimension,
- domination mode

FullText(HTML)

References(29)

References

[1]	张雷声. 论资本逻辑[J]. 新视野,2015(2):14-20. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-0138.2015.02.002
[2]	鲁品越, 王珊. 论资本逻辑的基本内涵[J]. 上海财经大学学报（哲学社会科学版）, 2013, 15（5）: 3-9.
[3]	彭宏伟. 资本社会的结构与逻辑——《资本论》议题再审视[M]. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2018.
[4]	马克思恩格斯选集（第一卷）[M]. 北京, 人民出版社, 2012.
[5]	马克思恩格斯全集（第三十卷）[M]. 北京: 人民出版社, 1995.
[6]	马克思恩格斯全集（第四十四卷）[M]. 北京: 人民出版社, 2001.
[7]	余达淮,陈光洁. 批判与建构:马克思资本概念的逻辑生成[J]. 江海学刊,2018(2):72-77,238. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-856X.2018.02.011
[8]	大卫·李嘉图. 政治经济学及赋税原理[M]//李嘉图著作和通信集（第一卷）. 郭大力, 王亚南, 译. 北京: 商务印书馆, 1962.
[9]	马克思恩格斯全集（第三十二卷）[M]. 北京: 人民出版社, 1998.
[10]	列宁全集（第五十五卷）[M]. 北京: 人民出版社, 2017.
[11]	郗戈. 《资本论》逻辑:资本逻辑还是“物象化”?[J]. 教学与研究,2016(9):5-12. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0257-2826.2016.09.001
[12]	王庆丰. 《资本论》“逻辑”的真实内容及其意义[N]. 中国社会科学报, 2018-1-25（03）.
[13]	邓晓芒. 黑格尔辩证法为形式逻辑的奠基[J]. 云南大学学报,2010(2):3-7,4.
[14]	刘志洪. 何谓“资本逻辑”−基于马克思思想的再理解[J]. 哲学研究,2019(12):32-40.
[15]	黑格尔. 逻辑学[M]. 杨一之, 译. 北京: 人民出版社, 1966.
[16]	邓晓芒. 辩证逻辑的本质之我见[J]. 逻辑与语言学习,1994(6):2-6.
[17]	马克思恩格斯文集（第1卷）[M]. 北京: 人民出版社, 2009.
[18]	仰海峰. 资本逻辑与时间规划−基于《资本论》第一卷的研究[J]. 哲学研究,2013(2):3-11,127.
[19]	居伊·德波. 景观社会[M]. 王昭风, 译. 南京: 南京大学出版社, 2006.
[20]	让·鲍德里亚. 消费社会[M]. 刘成富, 全志钢, 译. 南京: 南京大学出版社, 2000.
[21]	维·哈维. 后现代的状况: 对文化变迁之缘起的探究[M]. 阎嘉, 译. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2013.
[22]	苗翠翠. 当代社会的异化新形态−罗萨“社会加速逻辑批判”论析[J]. 国外理论动态,2020(4):28-36.
[23]	安东尼·吉登斯. 克里斯多弗·皮尔森. 现代性——吉登斯访谈录[M]. 尹宏毅, 译. 北京: 新华出版社, 2000.
[24]	韩立新. 异化、物象化、拜物教和物化[J]. 马克思主义与现实,2014(2):6-12.
[25]	MARX K. Das Kapita1 Kritik der Politischen Ökonomie [M]. Berlin: Dietz Verlag, 1983.
[26]	郗戈. 论《资本论》中的异化、物象化与抽象的关系问题[J]. 马克思主义与现实,2016(6):27-33.
[27]	希奥多·阿多诺,王凤才. 再论文化工业[J]. 云南大学学报,2012,11(4):4-8,111.
[28]	秦慧源. 唯物史观视域下的文化资本逻辑批判[J]. 哲学动态,2018(7):42-48.
[29]	包大为. 《共产党宣言》对政治概念的解构和重构[J]. 北京科技大学学报(社会科学版),2019,35(6):80-87. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-2689.2019.06.010