BAO Xing-jia, LUO Zai-bing. A Logogenetic Study of Negative Polarity in English Academic Discourse: A SFL Perspective[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2022, 38(5): 533-542. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022050035
Citation: BAO Xing-jia, LUO Zai-bing. A Logogenetic Study of Negative Polarity in English Academic Discourse: A SFL Perspective[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2022, 38(5): 533-542. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022050035

A Logogenetic Study of Negative Polarity in English Academic Discourse: A SFL Perspective

doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022050035
  • Received Date: 2022-05-11
    Available Online: 2022-10-10
  • Publish Date: 2022-10-25
  • Based on Systemic Functional Linguistics, taking a corpus-assisted approach, this study explores the logogenetic characteristics of negative polarity in English by adopting British Academic Written English (BAWE) and British Academic Spoken English (BASE) as corpus. The study finds that lexical negation in English written texts is significantly higher in frequency than that in spoken texts, realizing triple meta-functions; while mood negation, phrasal negation and adjunct group negation in written texts are significantly lower compared with spoken texts, realizing single or double meta-functions, which shows a discursive trend that meta-function realization by negative polarity becomes more simplified with the upgrade of clausal rank-scale. The study shows that the logogenetic characteristic of negative polarity system in English academic discourse could be attributed to the grammatical condensing in academic discourse. The different logogenetic potential of grammaticalization and lexicalization in negative polarity is conducive to the appliable choice of negative choice on the part of English learners in academic communication.

     

  • [1]
    JORDAN M P. The power of negation in English:text,context and relevance [J]. Journal of Pragmatics, 1998, 29(6):705-752. doi: 10.1016/S0378-2166(97)00086-6
    [2]
    克里斯特尔·戴维. 现代语言学词典[Z], 沈家煊, 译. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2000.
    [3]
    HALLIDAY M A K. Corpus studies and probabilistic grammar [C] // WEBSTER J. Computational and Quantitative Studies: Vol. 6 in The Collected Works of M. A. K. Halliday. London: Continuum, 1991: 63-76.
    [4]
    HALLIDAY M A K & MATTHIESSEN C M I M. An Introduction to Functional Grammar [M]. London: Routledge, 2014.
    [5]
    LAKOFF G. Pronominalization and the analysis of adverbs of negation [C]// RODERICK J & PETER R. Readings in English Transformation Grammar. Massachusetts: Ginn and Company, Waltham, 1970: 146-165.
    [6]
    HORN L R. Metalinguistic negation and pragmatic ambiguity [J]. Language, 1985, 61:121-174. doi: 10.2307/413423
    [7]
    孔庆成. 元语否定的类型[J]. 外国语(上海外国语大学学报),1995(4):11-16.
    [8]
    CARSTON R. Metalinguistic negation and echoic use [J]. Journal of pragmatics, 1996, 25(3):309-330. doi: 10.1016/0378-2166(94)00109-X
    [9]
    何春燕. 语用否定的类型及使用动机[J]. 解放军外国语学院学报,2002(3):20-24,53. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-722X.2002.03.005
    [10]
    梁晓波. 否定的认知分析[J]. 外语研究,2004(5):12-18,80. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-7242.2004.05.003
    [11]
    杨先顺. 语用否定的逻辑分析[J]. 自然辩证法研究,2005(1):28-32. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8934.2005.01.008
    [12]
    STÉPHANIE B. Lexical negation in English:the case of un- and in- [J]. Interlingüística, 2010, 20:1-9.
    [13]
    HAVIGEROVA J M & KARASKOVA H. Lexical negation in Czech initial education–negative imperatives from the teacher’s mouth [J]. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2012, 69:428-434. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.11.430
    [14]
    ANDREOU M. Lexical negation in lexical semantics:the prefixes in-and dis [J]. Morphology, 2015, 25(4):391-410. doi: 10.1007/s11525-015-9266-z
    [15]
    SINGERMAN A R. Negation as an exclusively nominal category [J]. Language, 2018, 94(2):432-467. doi: 10.1353/lan.2018.0022
    [16]
    LARRIVÉE P. Metalinguistic negation from an informational perspective [J]. Glossa:A Journal of General Linguistics, 2018, 3(1):1-22.
    [17]
    LARRIVÉE P. Turning negative:micro-steps from negative polarity item to negative-word [J]. Language Sciences, 2021, 85:1-14.
    [18]
    PAGANO A S. A Pragmatic Study of Negatives in Written Text [D]. Brazil: Federal University of Santacatarina, 1991.
    [19]
    WÄLCHLI B. The morphologization of negation constructions in Nalca (Mek,Tanah Papua),or,how nothing easily moves to the middle of a word [J]. Linguistics, 2018, 56(6):1413-1461. doi: 10.1515/ling-2018-0027
    [20]
    CABLE S. The good,the ‘not good’,and the ‘not pretty’:negation in the negative predicates of Tlingit [J]. Natural Language Semantics, 2018, 26(3):281-335.
    [21]
    FRAZIER L,CLIFTON JR C,RICH S,et al. Anticipating negation:the Dos and Don’ts of Neg raising [J]. Syntax, 2018, 21(2):160-194. doi: 10.1111/synt.12151
    [22]
    LI F,BORRÀS-COMES J & ESPINAL M T. Single negation interpretations in sentences with multiple negative expressions in Mandarin Chinese:an experimental investigation [J]. Lingua, 2018, 210:65-78.
    [23]
    LASNIK H. On the semantics of negation [C]// DAVID H, WILLAM H & BRIAN F. Contemporary Research in Philosophical Logic and Linguistic Semantics. Dordrecht: Springer, 1975: 279-313.
    [24]
    HORN L R. A Natural History of Negation [M]. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1989.
    [25]
    戴耀晶. 试论现代汉语的否定范畴[J]. 语言教学与研究,2000(3):45-49.
    [26]
    胡建华. 否定、焦点与辖域[J]. 中国语文,2007(2):99-112,191.
    [27]
    苗兴伟. 否定结构的语篇功能[J]. 外语教学与研究,2011,43(2):220-229,320.
    [28]
    SMITH S. B. Meaning and Negation [M]. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, 2015.
    [29]
    DUZI, M. Presuppositions and two kinds of negation [J]. Logique et Analyse, 2017, 239:245-263.
    [30]
    WODE H. Four early stages in the development of LI negation [J]. Journal of Child Language, 1977, 4(1):87-102. doi: 10.1017/S0305000900000490
    [31]
    于善志,张新红. 从独词句和否定句看标记与习得序列[J]. 现代外语,1999(4):382-396.
    [32]
    于善志. 否定标示的词汇特征和否定句习得序列[J]. 外语与外语教学,2002(8):17-19, 23. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-6038.2002.08.005
    [33]
    于善志. 从句法研究看L2英语否定句习得[J]. 天津外国语学院学报,2013(1):21-25.
    [34]
    苏冰. 第二语言习得中的学习顺序[J]. 山东外语教学,2005(1):74-75. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2643.2005.01.021
    [35]
    贾光茂. 中国英语学习者对否定句中全称量词辖域的解读[J]. 现代外语,2018,41(3):377-388.
    [36]
    REUTER T,FEIMAN R & SNEDEKER J. Getting to no:pragmatic and semantic factors in two-and three-year-olds’ understanding of negation [J]. Child Development, 2018, 89(4):e364-e381. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12858
    [37]
    于中根. 中国英语学习者英语否定句磨蚀的回归和阈值假说实证研究[J]. 外语教学,2014,35(1):59-63. doi: 10.16362/j.cnki.cn61-1023/h.2014.01.022
    [38]
    WANG J & CHAN Y H C. A feature-based approach to the acquisition of L2 Chinese negation by L1-English and L1-Korean learners [J]. Lingua, 2021, 252:1-23.
    [39]
    BIBER D. Variation across Speech and Writing [M]. London: Cambridge University Press, 1991.
    [40]
    TOTTIE G. Negation in English Speech and Writing: A Study in Variation [M]. San Diego: Academic Press, 1991.
    [41]
    TOTTIE G. Affixal and non-affixal negation-a case of stable variation over time? [C]// VAN OSTADE I T B, TOTTIE G & VAN DER WURFF W. Negation in the history of English. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, 2011: 233-268.
    [42]
    MARTÍNEZ I M P. Notes on the use and meaning of negation in contemporary written English [J]. Atlantis, 1995, 17(1-2):207-227.
    [43]
    BIBER D, JOHANSSON S & LEECH G. Spoken and Written English [M]. London: Edinburgh Gate: Person Education Limited, 1991.
    [44]
    VAN OSTADE I T B, TOTTIE G & VAN DER WURFF W. Negation in the History of English [M]. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, 1999.
    [45]
    陈桦. 英语专业学生口语中的否定表达的韵律特征−一项基于SECCL的研究[J]. 解放军外国语学院学报,2005(2):46-51. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-722X.2005.02.010
    [46]
    肖忠华,戴光荣. 英语中的否定:基于语料库的研究[J]. 外国语言文学,2009,26(4):228-236,288. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-4720.2009.04.002
    [47]
    HERRERO-ZORITA C. A statistical study of the usage of no-negation and not-negation in spoken academic English [J]. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Science, 2013, 95:482-489. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.672
    [48]
    刘英. 否定系统与语类变体−一项基于英语学术语篇的否定概率研究[J]. 外语与外语教学,2013(1):27-30. doi: 10.13458/j.cnki.flatt.003871
    [49]
    张玉波,杨炳钧. 小句极性的元功能归属[J]. 外语教学与研究,2019,51(2):225-238,320.
    [50]
    HALLIDAY M A K & MATTHIESSEN C M I M. An Introduction to Functional Grammar [M]. London: Edward Arnold, 2004.
    [51]
    HALLIDAY M A K. Complementarities in Language [M]. Beijing: The Commercial Press, 2008.
    [52]
    BIBER D, JOHANSSON S, LEECH G, et al. Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English [M]. Harlow: Pearson, 1999.
    [53]
    贾培培,张敬源. 时态的功能研究[J]. 北京科技大学学报(社会科学版),2015,31(3):31-37. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-2689.2015.03.005
    [54]
    HALLIDAY M A K. Quantitative studies and probabilities in grammar [C]// WEBSTER J. Computational and Quantitative Studies: Vol. 6 in The Collected Works of M. A. K. Halliday. London: Continuum, 1993: 130-157.
    [55]
    QUIRK R, GREENBAUM S, LEECH G, et al. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language [M]. New York: Longman, 1985.
    [56]
    庞雨甜,杨才英. 中外博士论文结论部分参与者导向词块情态特征对比研究[J]. 北京科技大学学报(社会科学版),2022,38(4):403-411.
    [57]
    刘飞飞,常晨光. 报纸社论中作者−潜在受众联合关系话语建构策略−系统功能语言学个性化视角[J]. 北京科技大学学报(社会科学版),2022,38(1):44-50.
    [58]
    HALLIDAY M A K & MATTHIESSEN C. Construing Experience through Meaning: A Language-based Approach to Cognition [M]. London: Continuum, 1999.
  • Relative Articles

    [1]ZHANG Peiwen. Systemic Functional Linguistics and Healthcare Communication: Review and Prospect[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2024, 40(4): 75-82. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2023020077
    [2]GAO Shengwen. On the Ideological Construction of University Journal from the Perspective of Systemic Functional Linguistics[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2024, 40(2): 112-118. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2023090061
    [3]HE Wei, ZHONG Wei. Reconsideration of the Taxis between Clauses within the Framework of Systemic Functional Linguistics[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2023, 39(4): 431-437. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2023030024
    [4]HUANG Guo-wen. What Is Systemic Functional Linguistics[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2023, 39(1): 73-89. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022100090
    [5]CHEN Yu-min, XU Ya-shan. The Functional Semantic Orientation of Systemic Functional Linguistics: Viewed from the History of Functional Grammar[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2023, 39(1): 90-98. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022090097
    [6]YANG Lin-xiu. Appliability of Systemic Functional Linguistics in Evidential Studies[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2022, 38(5): 517-524. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022070063
    [7]XIANG Da-jun. On the Symbiotic Thinking in Systemic Functional Linguistics[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2022, 38(5): 525-532. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022050096
    [8]LIU Yan. Readability Studies from the Perspective of Systemic Functional Linguistics[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 36(3): 11-18,27.
    [9]WANG Wen-feng, ZHANG Jing-yuan. Advances and Frontiers of Systemic Functional Linguistics Studies in China[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2019, 35(1): 24-29.
    [10]ZHANG Hong-yan, LI Man-liang. A Systemic Functional Analysis of Chinese Nominal Group with Classifier Phrases/Measure Phrases as the Modifier[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2017, 33(6): 40-44.
    [11]HE Wei, WEI Rong. Review of Transitivity Studies within Systemic Functional Linguistics[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2016, 32(1): 1-20.
    [12]LI Xue-ning, FAN Xin-ying. Research on the Know ledge Representation Method of Systemic Functional Linguistics[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2015, 31(3): 26-30.
    [13]HUI Zhang-zheng. Theory and Practice of History Discourse Analysis—from the Perspective of Systemic Functional Linguistics[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2015, 31(1): 33-38.
    [14]LI Zhong-hua. Research on Probability from a Systemic Functional Perspective[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2011, 27(3): 13-16.
    [15]CHANG Chen-guang, CHEN Yu-min. Systemic Functional Studies of Register[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2011, 27(3): 1-5.
    [16]GONG Zhang-hua. Genre Studies in Systemic Functional Linguistics[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2011, 27(3): 6-12.
    [17]SI Xian-zhu, HONG Dan-feng. A Functional Discourse Analysis on I Heard a Fly Buzz-When I Died[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2010, 26(2): 103-106.
    [18]HU Zhuang-lin. The Relation of Systemic Functional Linguistics to Sociolinguistics in Terms of Its Origin and Development[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2008, 24(2): 92-97.
    [19]WANG Hong-yang. The Relationships between the Cardiff Grammar and Systemic Functional Linguistics[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2008, 24(1): 117-121,134.
    [20]HUANG Guo-wen. The Cardiff Grammar: a Model in Systemic Functional Linguistics[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2008, 24(1): 93-100.
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(4)

    1. 张敏. 系统功能语言学融入大学英语智慧课堂的策略研究. 吉林工程技术师范学院学报. 2024(02): 70-75 .
    2. 李学宁,胡自威. 情感分析中的语法否定表达研究:加的夫模式初探. 北京科技大学学报(社会科学版). 2024(05): 74-82 .
    3. 鞠志勤,高秀雪. “过”的信息突显性及其解释力. 北京科技大学学报(社会科学版). 2024(06): 71-77 .
    4. 邓若岚. 系统功能结构下英语法律语篇语法隐喻探究. 现代英语. 2023(23): 81-84 .

    Other cited types(2)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-042025-052025-062025-07020406080
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 27.6 %FULLTEXT: 27.6 %META: 65.5 %META: 65.5 %PDF: 6.9 %PDF: 6.9 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 9.3 %其他: 9.3 %Ban Bo: 0.3 %Ban Bo: 0.3 %Buraidah: 0.1 %Buraidah: 0.1 %Central District: 0.1 %Central District: 0.1 %Rochester: 0.1 %Rochester: 0.1 %Seattle: 2.9 %Seattle: 2.9 %上海: 0.6 %上海: 0.6 %东莞: 0.2 %东莞: 0.2 %中卫: 0.1 %中卫: 0.1 %兰州: 0.1 %兰州: 0.1 %北京: 4.9 %北京: 4.9 %北海: 0.3 %北海: 0.3 %十堰: 0.2 %十堰: 0.2 %南京: 0.5 %南京: 0.5 %南昌: 0.4 %南昌: 0.4 %吉林: 0.1 %吉林: 0.1 %咸阳: 0.1 %咸阳: 0.1 %哥伦布: 0.6 %哥伦布: 0.6 %嘉兴: 0.2 %嘉兴: 0.2 %大连: 0.3 %大连: 0.3 %天津: 0.4 %天津: 0.4 %太原: 0.1 %太原: 0.1 %宁波: 0.2 %宁波: 0.2 %宣城: 0.7 %宣城: 0.7 %常州: 0.1 %常州: 0.1 %广元: 0.1 %广元: 0.1 %张家口: 3.4 %张家口: 3.4 %悉尼: 0.4 %悉尼: 0.4 %成都: 0.7 %成都: 0.7 %扬州: 0.5 %扬州: 0.5 %攀枝花: 0.1 %攀枝花: 0.1 %新奥尔良: 0.7 %新奥尔良: 0.7 %无锡: 0.2 %无锡: 0.2 %昆明: 0.1 %昆明: 0.1 %杭州: 0.7 %杭州: 0.7 %格兰特县: 0.2 %格兰特县: 0.2 %武汉: 0.3 %武汉: 0.3 %河源: 0.1 %河源: 0.1 %泰安: 0.9 %泰安: 0.9 %洛阳: 0.1 %洛阳: 0.1 %济南: 0.2 %济南: 0.2 %海口: 0.1 %海口: 0.1 %淄博: 0.2 %淄博: 0.2 %温州: 0.6 %温州: 0.6 %湖州: 0.1 %湖州: 0.1 %漯河: 1.9 %漯河: 1.9 %澳门: 0.1 %澳门: 0.1 %烟台: 0.1 %烟台: 0.1 %珠海: 0.5 %珠海: 0.5 %石家庄: 4.2 %石家庄: 4.2 %红磡: 0.1 %红磡: 0.1 %艾尔亚奈: 0.4 %艾尔亚奈: 0.4 %芒廷维尤: 18.3 %芒廷维尤: 18.3 %芝加哥: 0.8 %芝加哥: 0.8 %茂名: 0.2 %茂名: 0.2 %葵涌: 0.2 %葵涌: 0.2 %西宁: 35.6 %西宁: 35.6 %西安: 0.4 %西安: 0.4 %连云港: 0.1 %连云港: 0.1 %邯郸: 0.1 %邯郸: 0.1 %郑州: 0.7 %郑州: 0.7 %重庆: 0.4 %重庆: 0.4 %长沙: 1.5 %长沙: 1.5 %阿什本: 0.4 %阿什本: 0.4 %青岛: 0.2 %青岛: 0.2 %香港: 0.3 %香港: 0.3 %马鞍山: 0.2 %马鞍山: 0.2 %其他Ban BoBuraidahCentral DistrictRochesterSeattle上海东莞中卫兰州北京北海十堰南京南昌吉林咸阳哥伦布嘉兴大连天津太原宁波宣城常州广元张家口悉尼成都扬州攀枝花新奥尔良无锡昆明杭州格兰特县武汉河源泰安洛阳济南海口淄博温州湖州漯河澳门烟台珠海石家庄红磡艾尔亚奈芒廷维尤芝加哥茂名葵涌西宁西安连云港邯郸郑州重庆长沙阿什本青岛香港马鞍山

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(3)  / Tables(3)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (631) PDF downloads(67) Cited by(6)
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return