Volume 38 Issue 6
Dec.  2022
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
ZHAO Wei-zhong, WEI Yue-ning. On the Legal Dogmatics of the Coherence of Evidence between Supervision Law and Criminal Procedure Law[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2022, 38(6): 706-713. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022050017
Citation: ZHAO Wei-zhong, WEI Yue-ning. On the Legal Dogmatics of the Coherence of Evidence between Supervision Law and Criminal Procedure Law[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2022, 38(6): 706-713. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022050017

On the Legal Dogmatics of the Coherence of Evidence between Supervision Law and Criminal Procedure Law-Centered on the Regulations on the Implementation of the Supervision Law

doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022050017
  • Received Date: 2022-05-06
    Available Online: 2022-11-11
  • Publish Date: 2022-12-05
  • The introduction of the Regulations on the Implementation of the Supervision Law marks a new step in the evidence coherence of the criminal procedure law and supervision law. In order to accurately understand the coherence and application of evidence in duty-related crime cases, it needs to adopt the method of legal dogmatics. Before the work of interpretation starts, the subjectivism of legal dogmatics should be upheld. The Regulations on the Implementation of the Supervision Law has its own logical system in evidence coherence. Specifically, there are three types of norms: the type of norms of access to evidence, the type of norms of obtaining evidence, and the type of norms of excluding evidence. The types of evidence which belong to the norms of access to evidence can be used as evidence in criminal procedure. Article 69 of the Regulations on the Implementation of the Supervision Law creates a bidirectional rule of evidence coherence. The norms of obtaining evidence do not contain the rules on standards of proof but provide a positive way that the methods of collecting and acquiring evidence should accord with the criminal procedure law. In addition, the norms of excluding evidence provide a negative way for the exclusion of illegal evidence. Confessions obtained with illegal methods by supervisors should be excluded in criminal procedure.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    陈光中,邵俊. 我国监察体制改革若干问题思考[J]. 中国法学,2017(4):23-36.
    [2]
    朱孝清. 国家监察体制改革后检察制度的巩固与发展[J]. 法学研究,2018,40(4):3-19.
    [3]
    卞建林. 配合与制约:监察调查与刑事诉讼的衔接[J]. 法商研究,2019,36(1):15-22.
    [4]
    魏昌东. 监督职能是国家监察委员会的第一职能:理论逻辑与实现路径−兼论中国特色监察监督系统的规范性创建[J]. 法学论坛,2019,34(1):25-36.
    [5]
    魏德士. 法理学[M]. 丁晓春, 吴越, 译. 北京: 法律出版社, 2013.
    [6]
    博登海默. 法理学: 法律哲学与法律方法[M]. 邓正来, 译. 北京: 中国政法大学出版社, 2017.
    [7]
    焦宝乾. 历史解释与目的解释的区分难题及其破解[J]. 法商研究,2021,38(5):74-87.
    [8]
    张明楷. 刑法学[M]. 北京: 法律出版社, 2021.
    [9]
    杨仁寿. 法学方法论[M]. 北京: 中国政法大学出版社, 2013.
    [10]
    拉伦茨. 法学方法论[M]. 陈爱娥, 译. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2003.
    [11]
    李勇. 《监察法》与《刑事诉讼法》衔接问题研究−“程序二元、证据一体”理论模型之提出[J]. 证据科学,2018,26(5):563-576.
    [12]
    朱孝清. 刑事诉讼法与监察法衔接中的若干争议问题[J]. 中国刑事法杂志,2021(1):3-16.
    [13]
    张硕. 监察案件非法证据排除制度体系:法理解构与实践路径[J]. 政法论坛,2020,38(6):115-126.
    [14]
    冯俊伟. 《监察法》实施中的证据衔接问题[J]. 行政法学研究,2019(6):85-95.
    [15]
    姚莉. 《监察法》第33条之法教义学解释−以法法衔接为中心[J]. 法学,2021(1):64-77.
    [16]
    施鹏鹏. 证据法[M]. 北京: 中国政法大学出版社, 2020.
    [17]
    汪海燕. 审判中心与监察体制改革−以证据制度为视角[J]. 新疆社会科学,2018(3):118-124.
    [18]
    易延友. 刑事诉讼法: 规则 原理 应用[M]. 北京: 法律出版社, 2019.
    [19]
    熊晓彪. 刑事证据标准与证明标准之异同[J]. 法学研究,2019,41(4):191-208.
    [20]
    董坤. 监察与司法衔接中的证据问题研究[J]. 西南民族大学学报(人文社会科学版),2021,42(7):117-125. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-3926.2021.07.015
    [21]
    雷磊. 法律规则的逻辑结构[J]. 法学研究,2013,35(1):66-86.
    [22]
    陈卫东,简乐伟. 提起公诉的证据标准问题研究[J]. 河南社会科学,2010,18(1):83-88. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-905X.2010.01.022
    [23]
    赵飞龙. 非法口供的比较与述评[J]. 北京科技大学学报(社会科学版),2019,35(6):96-102. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-2689.2019.06.012
    [24]
    孙国祥. 监察对象的刑法主体身份辨析[J]. 法学,2019(9):3-14.
    [25]
    刘艳红. 职务犯罪案件非法证据的审查与排除−以《监察法》与《刑事诉讼法》之衔接为背景[J]. 法学评论,2019,37(1):172-183.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (294) PDF downloads(38) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return