Research on the Driving Mechanism and Policy of Public Green Consumption Mode

XUE Han-xin

doi:10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022010047

Volume 38 Issue 3

Jun. 2022

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition) > 2022 > 38(3): 325-334

XUE Han-xin. Research on the Driving Mechanism and Policy of Public Green Consumption Mode[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2022, 38(3): 325-334. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022010047

Citation:

XUE Han-xin. Research on the Driving Mechanism and Policy of Public Green Consumption Mode[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2022, 38(3): 325-334. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022010047

Citation:

PDF( 975 KB)

Research on the Driving Mechanism and Policy of Public Green Consumption Mode

doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022010047

XUE Han-xin

Department of Administration, The Party School of Fuzhou, Fuzhou 350014, China

Received Date: 2022-01-21
Available Online: 2022-06-01
Publish Date: 2022-06-23

Abstract

Abstract

Based on the theory of self-determination, taking new energy vehicles as an example, the structural equation model is used to discuss the driving mechanism of the public’s green consumption pattern and the moderating role of consumers’ innovation from the perspective of motivation. The research results show that the public's internal motivation and external motivation have a significant positive impact on their green consumption attitude and new energy vehicle purchase intention. Compared with internal motivation, external motivation has a greater impact on green consumption attitude and new energy vehicle purchase intention. Green consumption attitude has a significant positive impact on the purchase intention of new energy vehicles; consumer innovation has a positive moderating effect between self-determination motivation and new energy vehicle purchase intention, and has a positive effect between self-determination motivation and green consumption attitude.
- green consumption model,
- new energy vehicle,
- Self-Determination Theory,
- green consumption attitude,
- consumer innovation,
- purchase intention

FullText(HTML)

References(36)

References

[1]	吴波,李东进,谢宗晓. 消费者绿色产品偏好的影响因素研究[J]. 软科学,2014,28(12):89-94. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-8409.2014.12.020
[2]	STRAUGHAN R D & ROBERTS J A. Environmental segmentation alternatives: a look at green consumer behavior in the new millennium [J]. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 1999, 16(6):558-575. doi: 10.1108/07363769910297506
[3]	童璐琼,苏凇,锁梦晨. 自然环境价值观对消费者产品选择的影响[J]. 经济与管理研究,2017,38(3):114-121.
[4]	EOM K, KIM H S & SHERMAN D K. Social class, control, and action: socioeconomic status differences in antecedents of support for pro-environmental action [J]. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2018, 77:60-75. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2018.03.009
[5]	DECI E L & RYAN R M. The general causality orientations scale: self-determination in personality [J]. Journal of Research in Personality, 1985, 19(2):109-134. doi: 10.1016/0092-6566(85)90023-6
[6]	杨皎平,张珺,孙珊. 研发团队包容型人力资源管理实践对员工和谐型创新激情的影响研究[J]. 中国人力资源开发,2021,38(8):21-36.
[7]	李华健,赵翔,游江波. 时间管理倾向在自我决定动机和锻炼习惯间的中介作用[J]. 天津师范大学学报(社会科学版),2021(6):113-117.
[8]	KAPLAN H & MADJAR N. Autonomous motivation and pro-environmental behaviours among Bedouin students in Israel: a self-determination theory perspective [J]. Australian Journal of Environmental Education, 2015, 31(2):1-25.
[9]	HIRSCHMAN E C. Innovativeness, novelty seeking, and consumer creativity [J]. Journal of Consumer Research, 1980, 7(3):283-295. doi: 10.1086/208816
[10]	ROEHRICH G. Consumer innovativeness: concepts and measurements [J]. Journal of Business Research, 2004, 57(6):671-677. doi: 10.1016/S0148-2963(02)00311-9
[11]	ROGERS E M & SHOEMAKER F F. Communication of Innovations: A Cross-cultural Approach [M]. New York: Free Press, 1971.
[12]	韦庆旺,孙健敏. 对环保行为的心理学解读−规范焦点理论述评[J]. 心理科学进展,2013,21(4):751-760.
[13]	AJZEN I. The theory of planned behavior [J]. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1991(2):179-211.
[14]	CHAN R Y K. Determinants of Chinese consumers’ green purchase behavior [J]. Psychology & Marketing, 2010, 18(4):389-413.
[15]	GUAGNANO G A, STERN P C & DIETZ T. Influences on attitude-behavior relationships a natural experiment with curbside recycling [J]. Environment and behavior, 1995, 27(5):699-718. doi: 10.1177/0013916595275005
[16]	JUDD C M & MILBURN M A. The structure of attitude system in the general public: comparisons of a structural equation model [J]. American Sociological Review, 1980, 45(4):627-643. doi: 10.2307/2095012
[17]	吴春梅,张伟. 居民低碳认知态度与行为的实证研究[J]. 技术经济与管理研究,2013(7):123-128. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-292X.2013.07.025
[18]	迈尔斯. 社会心理学(第8版)[M]. 侯玉波, 乐国安, 张智勇, 译, 北京: 人民邮电出版社, 2006.
[19]	ENGSTROEM J & ELG M. A self-determination theory perspective on customer participation in service development [J]. Journal of Services Marketing, 2015, 29(6-7):511-521.
[20]	STERN P C, DIETZ T, ABEL T. A value-belief-norm theory of support for social movements: the case of environmentalism [J]. Human Ecology Review, 1999, 6(2):81-97.
[21]	郭豪杰,张薇,郑兆峰,等. 农户亲环境行为动机拥挤效应检验−来自云南省1050份农户调研证据[J]. 干旱区资源与环境,2021,35(4):38-45.
[22]	BAGOZZI R P. A field investigation of causal relations among cognitions, affect, intentions, and behavior [J]. Journal of Marketing Research, 1982, 19(4):562. doi: 10.1177/002224378201900415
[23]	陈良敏. 基于TPB理论下绿色农产品购买行为的影响研究[J]. 北京科技大学学报(社会科学版),2018,34(3):62-69.
[24]	MOON W & GRIFFITH J W. Assessing holistic economic value for multifunctional agriculture in the US [J]. Food Policy, 2011, 36(4):455-465. doi: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2011.05.003
[25]	申静,渠美,郑东晖,等. 农户对生活垃圾源头分类处理的行为研究−基于TPB和NAM整合框架[J]. 干旱区资源与环境,2020,34(7):75-81.
[26]	许衍凤,赵晓康. 感知契合度对老字号品牌延伸态度的影响−消费者创新性的调节效应研究[J]. 北京工商大学学报(社会科学版),2014,29(2):112-119.
[27]	高键,盛光华,周蕾. 绿色产品购买意向的影响机制: 基于消费者创新性视角[J]. 广东财经大学学报,2016,31(2):33-42.
[28]	杜鑫. 消费者创新性与绿色消费行为: 理论机制与实证研究[J]. 商业经济研究,2020(19):56-58. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-5863.2020.19.013
[29]	TABERNERO C & HERNÁNDEZ H. Self-efficacy and intrinsic motivation guiding environmental behavior [J]. Environment and Behavior, 2011, 43(5):658-675. doi: 10.1177/0013916510379759
[30]	DE GROOT J I M & STEG L. Relationships between value orientations, self-determined motivational types and pro-environmental behavioural intentions [J]. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2010, 30(4):368-378. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.04.002
[31]	劳可夫. 消费者创新性对绿色消费行为的影响机制研究[J]. 南开管理评论,2013,16(4):106-113, 132. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-3448.2013.04.011
[32]	GOLLWITZER P M. Implementation intentions: strong effects of simple plans [J]. American Psychologist, 1999, 54(7):493-503. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.54.7.493
[33]	IM S, MASON C H & HOUSTON M B. Does innate consumer innovativeness relate to new product/service adoption behavior? The intervening role of social learning via vicarious innovativeness [J]. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 2007, 35(1):63-75. doi: 10.1007/s11747-006-0007-z
[34]	GOLDSMITH R E & HOFACKER C F. Measuring consumer innovativeness [J]. Academic Marketing Science, 1991, 19(3):209-221. doi: 10.1007/BF02726497
[35]	温忠麟,侯杰泰,张雷. 调节效应与中介效应的比较和应用[J]. 心理学报,2005,37(2):268-274.
[36]	MIDGLEY F D & GRAHAME R. Dowling. A longitudinal study of product form innovation: the interaction between predis-positions and social messages [J]. Journal of Consumer Research, 1993, 19(3):611-625.