On the Semantic and Grammatical Interpretations of Story, Discourse and Narrative

ZHOU Wen-juan

doi:10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2021120095

Volume 38 Issue 3

Jun. 2022

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition) > 2022 > 38(3): 272-280

ZHOU Wen-juan. On the Semantic and Grammatical Interpretations of Story, Discourse and Narrative[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2022, 38(3): 272-280. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2021120095

Citation:

ZHOU Wen-juan. On the Semantic and Grammatical Interpretations of Story, Discourse and Narrative[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2022, 38(3): 272-280. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2021120095

Citation:

PDF( 973 KB)

On the Semantic and Grammatical Interpretations of Story, Discourse and Narrative

doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2021120095

ZHOU Wen-juan

Colleges of Foreign Languages, Inner Mongolia University of Technology, Hohhot 010080, China

Received Date: 2021-12-26
Available Online: 2022-06-01
Publish Date: 2022-06-23

Abstract

Abstract

Three overlapping concepts of story, discourse and narrative can find themselves different in five aspects of basic denotations, mutual relationships, basic assumptions, analysis models, and corresponding types, by examining the semantic and grammatical aspects of those three terms. Such interpretations involve four sets of terms: (1) story, discourse and narrative; (2) narrative discourse, story narrative and narrative story; (3) ecological story, ecological discourse and ecological narrative; (4) story grammar, narrative grammar, functional grammar, and ecological grammar. Those four sets of terms strikingly differ in their corresponding analysis models and corresponding types, reflecting the ecological turn in the fields of narratology and linguistics. Those findings can provide new ideas for integrating ecolinguistics and ecological narratology, and establishing a new framework for the connective knowledge of transdisciplinary ecolinguistics, and providing a new basis for constructing ecological narrative analysis model.
- story,
- discourse,
- narrative,
- the ecological turn,
- transdisciplinary ecolinguistics,
- ecological narrative analysis model

FullText(HTML)

References(29)

References

[1]	唐伟胜. 范式与层面: 国外叙事学研究综述−兼评国内叙事学研究现状[J]. 外国语,2003(5):60-66. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-5139.2003.05.009
[2]	JAMES E. The Storyworld Accord: Econarratology and Postcolonial Narratives [M]. Lincoln and London: University of Nebraska Press, 2015.
[3]	FINA M D & GEORGAKOPOULOU A. Analyzing Narrative: Discourse and Sociolinguistic Perspectives [M]. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2012.
[4]	彭宣维. 话语、故事和情节−从系统功能语言学看叙事学的相关基本范畴[J]. 外国语(上海外国语大学学报),2000(6):44-50.
[5]	STIBBE A. Ecolinguistics: Language, Ecology and the Stories We Live By [M]. London and New York: Routledge, 2021.
[6]	NANSON A. Storytelling and Ecology: Empathy, Enchantment, and Emergence in the Use of Oral Narratives [M]. Routledge: London and New York, 2021.
[7]	西摩·查特曼. 故事与话语: 小说和电影的叙事结构[M]. 徐强, 译. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2013.
[8]	GENETTE G. Narrative Discourse: An Essay in Method [M]. LEWIN J. (tr. ). New York: Cornell University Press, 1983.
[9]	张辉. 论叙事结构和叙述话语[J]. 南京大学学报(哲学社会科学版),1996(2):54-63, 74.
[10]	陈艳飞. 抗击疫情中的故事叙事及其思想政治教育价值的实现[J]. 理论建设,2020,36(2):6-9.
[11]	赵蕊华,陈瑜敏. 生态语言学视角下中国新生态故事研究[J]. 外语学刊,2021(4):18-25.
[12]	黄国文. 讲好生态文明的中国故事[N]. 中国社会科学报, 2020-01-10(04).
[13]	周文娟. 生态哲学观: 阐释、建构、融合与拓展[J]. 阴山学刊,2020,33(6):54-59. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1869(s).2020.06.012
[14]	何伟,魏榕. 国际生态话语的内涵及研究路向[J]. 外语研究,2017,34(5):18-24.
[15]	黄国文,陈旸. 生态话语分类的不确定性[J]. 北京第二外国语学院学报,2018,40(1):3-14.
[16]	HEISE U K. Eco-narratives[C]// HERMAN D, JAHN M & RYAN M-L. Routledge Encyclopedia of Narrative Theory . Routledge: London and New York, 2005: 129-130.
[17]	杰拉德·普林斯. 故事的语法[M]. 徐强, 译. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2014.
[18]	杰拉德·普林斯. 叙事学: 叙事的形式与功能[M]. 徐强, 译. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2013.
[19]	黄国文, 辛志英. 什么是功能语法[M]. 上海: 上海外语教育出版社, 2014.
[20]	何伟, 张瑞杰, 淡晓红, 等. 汉语功能语义分析[M]. 北京: 外语教学与研究出版社, 2017.
[21]	王全智. 小句复合体与复句的比对研究[J]. 外语与外语教学,2008(11):9-12. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-6038.2008.11.003
[22]	何伟,魏榕. 话语分析范式与生态话语分析的理论基础[J]. 当代修辞学,2018(5):63-73.
[23]	周文娟. 英语及物性分析的方法、假定、目标和原则−以“The earthquake destroyed the city”为例[J]. 北京科技大学学报(社会科学版),2019,35(5):9-16.
[24]	周文娟. 生态语言学的新展望: 从绿色语法到生态语法[J]. 北京科技大学学报(社会科学版),2021,37(3):247-253.
[25]	ZHOU W. Ecolinguistics: a half-century overview [J]. Journal of World Languages, 2022, 7(3):461-486.
[26]	FINKE P. Transdisciplinary linguistics: ecolinguistics as a pacemaker into a new scientific age[C]// FILL A & PENZ H. The Routledge Handbook of Ecolinguistics. Routledge: London, 2018: 406–419.
[27]	张慧玉,叶忱璨. 狭义语言生态学的界定及国外研究述评[J]. 北京科技大学学报(社会科学版),2022,38(1):33-43.
[28]	常远. 基于ROST内容挖掘的国内外生态语言学研究动态及热点分析[J]. 北京科技大学学报(社会科学版),2021,37(6):583-591.
[29]	周文娟,翟晨笑. 学科建设、理论建构与模式创建: 黄国文生态语言学研究的三个维度[J]. 鄱阳湖学刊,2022(1):44-53, 126. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-6848.2022.01.005