Volume 38 Issue 3
Jun.  2022
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
CHEN Li-wen. Reflection and Outlet of the Debate on the View of Criminal Law Legislation[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2022, 38(3): 346-352. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2021120026
Citation: CHEN Li-wen. Reflection and Outlet of the Debate on the View of Criminal Law Legislation[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2022, 38(3): 346-352. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2021120026

Reflection and Outlet of the Debate on the View of Criminal Law Legislation

doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2021120026
  • Received Date: 2021-12-07
    Available Online: 2022-06-01
  • Publish Date: 2022-06-23
  • The differences between the positive and negative views of criminal law legislation are not as big as imagined, and they have much in common on the basis of argument and demonstration results. The reason why their contradictions are so prominent is that, on the surface, the two sides have misunderstood of each other’s viewpoints and argurments, which deviate from the essence of the issue and lack of objective evaluation standards, but the deep reason is that the two sides have different standpoints of criminal law. The key to resolve this problem is to get out of the binary opposite thinking mode of “either-or” and seek the integration of the two viewpoints of criminal law. This is not only the inevitable requirement for the integration of the criminal school from controversy, but also the realistic need for the construction of criminal rule of law in China under the background of the new era. Specifically, it is necessary to focus on the empirical basis of criminal law legislation and regulate the public participation in criminal law legislation with the guidance of holistic thinking of social governance.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    储槐植. 刑事一体化论要[M]. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2007.
    [2]
    王强军. 社会治理过度刑法化的隐忧[J]. 当代法学,2019,33(2):3-12.
    [3]
    付立庆. 论积极主义刑法观[J]. 政法论坛,2019,37(1):99-111. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0208.2019.01.009
    [4]
    刘宪权. 刑事立法应力戒情绪−以《刑法修正案(九)》为视角[J]. 法学评论,2016,34(1):86-97.
    [5]
    张明楷. 增设新罪的观念−对积极刑法观的支持[J]. 现代法学,2020,42(5):150-166. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-2397.2020.05.11
    [6]
    高铭暄,孙道萃. 预防性刑法观及其教义学思考[J]. 中国法学,2018(1):166-189.
    [7]
    何荣功. 社会治理“过度刑法化”的法哲学批判[J]. 中外法学,2015,27(2):523-547.
    [8]
    刘艳红. 我国应该停止犯罪化的刑事立法[J]. 法学,2011(11):108-115.
    [9]
    周光权. 转型时期刑法立法的思路与方法[J]. 中国社会科学,2016(3):123-146, 207.
    [10]
    周光权. 积极刑法立法观在中国的确立[J]. 法学研究,2016,38(4):23-40.
    [11]
    乔治·弗莱彻. 反思刑法[M]. 邓子滨, 译. 北京: 华夏出版社, 2008.
    [12]
    斯坦因·U. 拉尔森. 社会科学理论与方法[M]. 任晓, 等译. 上海: 上海人民出版社, 2002.
    [13]
    陈兴良. 刑法的启蒙[M]. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2018.
    [14]
    贝卡里亚. 论犯罪与刑罚[M]. 黄风, 译. 北京: 中国法制出版社, 2005.
    [15]
    陈家林. 外国刑法理论的思潮和流变[M]. 北京: 中国人民公安大学出版社, 2017.
    [16]
    陈子平. 刑法总论[M]. 台北: 元照出版公司, 2017.
    [17]
    李斯特. 德国刑法教科书[M]. 徐久生, 译. 北京: 法律出版社, 2006.
    [18]
    孟德斯鸠. 论法的精神[M]. 许明龙, 译. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2016.
    [19]
    邓子滨. 中国实质刑法观批判[M], 北京: 法律出版社, 2017.
    [20]
    恩里科·菲利. 实证派犯罪学[M]. 郭建安, 译. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2016.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (371) PDF downloads(40) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return