YU Cheng-wen. Effectively Promote the Spirit of Xi Jinping’s Important Reply to the Senior Professors of USTB to Take Root[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2022, 38(3): 233-236. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022050092
Citation: CHEN Li-wen. Reflection and Outlet of the Debate on the View of Criminal Law Legislation[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2022, 38(3): 346-352. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2021120026

Reflection and Outlet of the Debate on the View of Criminal Law Legislation

doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2021120026
  • Received Date: 2021-12-07
    Available Online: 2022-06-01
  • Publish Date: 2022-06-23
  • The differences between the positive and negative views of criminal law legislation are not as big as imagined, and they have much in common on the basis of argument and demonstration results. The reason why their contradictions are so prominent is that, on the surface, the two sides have misunderstood of each other’s viewpoints and argurments, which deviate from the essence of the issue and lack of objective evaluation standards, but the deep reason is that the two sides have different standpoints of criminal law. The key to resolve this problem is to get out of the binary opposite thinking mode of “either-or” and seek the integration of the two viewpoints of criminal law. This is not only the inevitable requirement for the integration of the criminal school from controversy, but also the realistic need for the construction of criminal rule of law in China under the background of the new era. Specifically, it is necessary to focus on the empirical basis of criminal law legislation and regulate the public participation in criminal law legislation with the guidance of holistic thinking of social governance.

     

  • [1]
    储槐植. 刑事一体化论要[M]. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2007.
    [2]
    王强军. 社会治理过度刑法化的隐忧[J]. 当代法学,2019,33(2):3-12.
    [3]
    付立庆. 论积极主义刑法观[J]. 政法论坛,2019,37(1):99-111. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0208.2019.01.009
    [4]
    刘宪权. 刑事立法应力戒情绪−以《刑法修正案(九)》为视角[J]. 法学评论,2016,34(1):86-97.
    [5]
    张明楷. 增设新罪的观念−对积极刑法观的支持[J]. 现代法学,2020,42(5):150-166. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-2397.2020.05.11
    [6]
    高铭暄,孙道萃. 预防性刑法观及其教义学思考[J]. 中国法学,2018(1):166-189.
    [7]
    何荣功. 社会治理“过度刑法化”的法哲学批判[J]. 中外法学,2015,27(2):523-547.
    [8]
    刘艳红. 我国应该停止犯罪化的刑事立法[J]. 法学,2011(11):108-115.
    [9]
    周光权. 转型时期刑法立法的思路与方法[J]. 中国社会科学,2016(3):123-146, 207.
    [10]
    周光权. 积极刑法立法观在中国的确立[J]. 法学研究,2016,38(4):23-40.
    [11]
    乔治·弗莱彻. 反思刑法[M]. 邓子滨, 译. 北京: 华夏出版社, 2008.
    [12]
    斯坦因·U. 拉尔森. 社会科学理论与方法[M]. 任晓, 等译. 上海: 上海人民出版社, 2002.
    [13]
    陈兴良. 刑法的启蒙[M]. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2018.
    [14]
    贝卡里亚. 论犯罪与刑罚[M]. 黄风, 译. 北京: 中国法制出版社, 2005.
    [15]
    陈家林. 外国刑法理论的思潮和流变[M]. 北京: 中国人民公安大学出版社, 2017.
    [16]
    陈子平. 刑法总论[M]. 台北: 元照出版公司, 2017.
    [17]
    李斯特. 德国刑法教科书[M]. 徐久生, 译. 北京: 法律出版社, 2006.
    [18]
    孟德斯鸠. 论法的精神[M]. 许明龙, 译. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2016.
    [19]
    邓子滨. 中国实质刑法观批判[M], 北京: 法律出版社, 2017.
    [20]
    恩里科·菲利. 实证派犯罪学[M]. 郭建安, 译. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2016.
  • Relative Articles

    [1]YOU Guangyu. The Normative Position and Realization Path of Criminal Law Protection of Social Credit[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2024, 40(6): 91-100. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2023110106
    [2]CHEN Yu, XU Fangdi. Analysis of Criminal Law Doctrine Analysis on the Realization of Incentive Function of Enterprise Corporate[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2023, 39(6): 798-807. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022100076
    [3]XING Bin-wen. How Legislators Deal with Scientific & Technological Issues[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 37(6): 670-678.
    [4]CAO Hai-jing, WU Han-dong. Local Cooperative Legislation from the Perspective of Regional Development Right[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 37(1): 56-65.
    [5]WU Rui-jia. Research on the Normative Application of Legislative Quantitative Evaluation Method[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 37(3): 290-298.
    [6]ZHANG Xin-wen. Research on the Interpretation of Criminal Law under the Dichotomy of Cybercrime[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 37(6): 679-688.
    [7]SHEN Wei. The Integration, Innovation and Development of Linguistic Studies under the Background of the New Liberal Arts[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 37(1): 24-32.
    [8]HU Zhuang-lin. On the Integration of Linguistic Research[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 37(1): 12-16.
    [9]FU Qiang. A Brief Analysis on the Improvement of the Legislation of the People’s Livelihood of China[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2016, 32(5): 81-88,101.
    [10]FENG Ying, ZHANG Ming-lei. Analysis on the Functions of Administrative Legislative Hearing[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2013, 29(6): 52-59,67.
    [11]YU Hao, CHEN Zhao-xin. In the Name of the Rule of Law: Comment on Research on the Legality Principle from the Perspective of Rule of Law[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2013, 29(4): 74-79.
    [12]DU Xiao-zhi, HE Cheng. Legislative Mode Selection of Tort Law in Civil Code System[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2010, 26(1): 80-83,107.
    [13]WANG Zhu-qing. A Study on the Necessity of Legislation on the Protection of Domestic Workers' Labor Rights and Interests[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2010, 26(1): 65-69,74.
    [14]ZHANG Kai-jun. Review on the Concept of Consequential Offense——Comparative Analysis on a Neglected Basic Conception of Criminal[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2010, 26(2): 92-96.
    [15]LI Yi-ming. Combination of Lenience and Strictness--Orientation of the Legislation of Crime by Taking Advantage of Duty Under the Harmonious Society Context[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2008, 24(2): 47-51.
    [16]WANG Jin-lan, LI Jie-hua. The Legislative Development of International Factoring and Its Practice in China[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2008, 24(4): 65-72.
    [17]XING Jiang, WANG Yang. Research on Legislation of the Crime of Bankruptcy Fraud[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2008, 24(1): 54-60.
    [18]HAN Yong-jiang, ZHANG Jia-sheng. Research on Legislation of Worker Dispatching Based on the Draft of Labour Contracts Law[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2006, 22(4): 85-88.
    [19]HUANG Hui. Research on the system of Estate Register in China[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2001, 17(3): 67-72.
  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-042025-052025-062025-07051015202530
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 33.5 %FULLTEXT: 33.5 %META: 59.4 %META: 59.4 %PDF: 7.1 %PDF: 7.1 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 5.1 %其他: 5.1 %其他: 0.7 %其他: 0.7 %Macau: 0.1 %Macau: 0.1 %Rochester: 0.4 %Rochester: 0.4 %Seattle: 2.6 %Seattle: 2.6 %上海: 0.6 %上海: 0.6 %东莞: 0.1 %东莞: 0.1 %临汾: 0.2 %临汾: 0.2 %临沂: 0.2 %临沂: 0.2 %北京: 2.4 %北京: 2.4 %北海: 0.1 %北海: 0.1 %南京: 0.4 %南京: 0.4 %南昌: 0.4 %南昌: 0.4 %厦门: 0.2 %厦门: 0.2 %台州: 0.1 %台州: 0.1 %哥伦布: 0.2 %哥伦布: 0.2 %嘉兴: 0.2 %嘉兴: 0.2 %大连: 0.1 %大连: 0.1 %天津: 0.5 %天津: 0.5 %宣城: 0.2 %宣城: 0.2 %常州: 0.1 %常州: 0.1 %广州: 0.1 %广州: 0.1 %张家口: 1.5 %张家口: 1.5 %扬州: 0.5 %扬州: 0.5 %新奥尔良: 1.7 %新奥尔良: 1.7 %无锡: 0.4 %无锡: 0.4 %昆明: 0.6 %昆明: 0.6 %杭州: 0.5 %杭州: 0.5 %武汉: 0.6 %武汉: 0.6 %永州: 0.2 %永州: 0.2 %泉州: 0.2 %泉州: 0.2 %淄博: 0.1 %淄博: 0.1 %温州: 0.2 %温州: 0.2 %湖州: 0.1 %湖州: 0.1 %漯河: 0.5 %漯河: 0.5 %焦作: 0.1 %焦作: 0.1 %珠海: 0.2 %珠海: 0.2 %石家庄: 3.1 %石家庄: 3.1 %福州: 0.2 %福州: 0.2 %芒廷维尤: 30.4 %芒廷维尤: 30.4 %芝加哥: 0.6 %芝加哥: 0.6 %苏州: 0.2 %苏州: 0.2 %莫尔黑德: 0.1 %莫尔黑德: 0.1 %菏泽: 0.4 %菏泽: 0.4 %萍乡: 0.1 %萍乡: 0.1 %衡阳: 0.1 %衡阳: 0.1 %西宁: 37.8 %西宁: 37.8 %西安: 0.2 %西安: 0.2 %邯郸: 0.1 %邯郸: 0.1 %邵阳: 0.1 %邵阳: 0.1 %郑州: 0.2 %郑州: 0.2 %金华: 0.7 %金华: 0.7 %长春: 0.2 %长春: 0.2 %长沙: 1.9 %长沙: 1.9 %阳泉: 0.1 %阳泉: 0.1 %阿什本: 0.4 %阿什本: 0.4 %青岛: 0.2 %青岛: 0.2 %其他其他MacauRochesterSeattle上海东莞临汾临沂北京北海南京南昌厦门台州哥伦布嘉兴大连天津宣城常州广州张家口扬州新奥尔良无锡昆明杭州武汉永州泉州淄博温州湖州漯河焦作珠海石家庄福州芒廷维尤芝加哥苏州莫尔黑德菏泽萍乡衡阳西宁西安邯郸邵阳郑州金华长春长沙阳泉阿什本青岛

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (501) PDF downloads(62) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return