Volume 38 Issue 1
Feb.  2022
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Abstract
References
Article Navigation >  Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition)  > 2022  >  38(1): 103-110
YU Wen-qing. The Constitutional Meanings of the Right of Habitation Norms in the Civil Code[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2022, 38(1): 103-110. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2021110011
Citation: YU Wen-qing. The Constitutional Meanings of the Right of Habitation Norms in the Civil Code[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2022, 38(1): 103-110. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2021110011
shu

The Constitutional Meanings of the Right of Habitation Norms in the Civil Code

doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2021110011

  • Department of Law, Fujian Police College, Fuzhou 350000, China

  • Received Date: 2021-11-02
    Available Online: 2022-01-24
  • Publish Date: 2022-02-12
    Abstract
  • The right of habitation stipulated in the Civil Code of the People’s Republic of China contains strong constitutional elements. The principle of socialism and the basic right clauses articulated in the Constitution are fundamental values for protections of the right of habitation in civil law and constitute the background norms of interpretation of the right of habitation in civil law. According to the principle of constitution, such as disposition of basic rights, restriction of basic rights and conflict of basic rights, the disposition of right of habitation is subject to certain restriction and the protection of constitution’s “weakness” nature. In dealing with civil cases in which citizens’ right of habitation conflicts with other citizens’ rights and administrative cases in which the state expropriates and requisitions property based on public interests, the court should cultivate the constitution consciousness at the macro level, and distinguish the different positions of constitutional validity in “judgment basis” and “judgment reason” at the micro level, so as to accurately explain and guide the application of the civil law residence right norms based on the principle of constitutional fundamental rights.

     

    • FullText(HTML)
    • References(23)
  • [1]
    凯斯·孙斯坦. 设计民主: 论宪法的作用[M]. 金朝武, 刘会春, 译. 北京: 法律出版社, 2006.
    [2]
    LECKIE S. The right to housing [J]. Newsletter, 1987(20):10-25.
    [3]
    张力. 宪法性居住权在我国的民法实现途径−面向土地的“公产”取向[J]. 河北法学,2010,28(6):2-10.
    [4]
    聂鑫. 如何保障住房权?−比较宪法的案例思考[J]. 比较法研究,2013(4):116-122.
    [5]
    Olga Tellis v. Bombay Municipal Council, 1985 2 Supp SCR 51.
    [6]
    李来孺. 印度编纂民法典的宪法目标为何未能实现?[J]. 清华法学,2020,14(1):140-157.
    [7]
    孙中山. 孙中山选集[M]. 北京: 人民出版社, 1981.
    [8]
    金俭. 中国住宅法研究[M]. 北京: 法律出版社, 2004.
    [9]
    GOMES M & THIELE B. Housing rights are human rights [J]. Human Rights, 2005, 32(3):2-24.
    [10]
    张翔. 民法人格权规范的宪法意涵[J]. 法制与社会发展,2020,26(4):119-132.
    [11]
    张翔. 宪法与部门法的三重关系[J]. 中国法律评论,2019(1):26-33.
    [12]
    苏永钦. 走进新世纪的私法自治[M]. 北京: 中国政法大学出版社, 2002.
    [13]
    陈新民. 德国公法学基础理论[M]. 北京: 法律出版社, 2010.
    [14]
    王文东. 恩格斯的居住正义思想及其启示[J]. 哲学动态,2010(5):14-19.
    [15]
    优士丁尼. 法学阶梯[M]. 徐国栋, 译. 北京: 中国政法大学出版社, 1999.
    [16]
    童彬. 法国财产权体系之源与流[M]. 北京: 法律出版社, 2014.
    [17]
    申卫星. 《民法典》居住权制度的体系展开[J]. 吉林大学社会科学学报,2021,61(3):51-61.
    [18]
    张翔. 基本权利限制问题的思考框架[J]. 法学家,2008(1):134-139. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-0221.2008.01.031
    [19]
    朱应平. 论宪法保障民生的路径[J]. 江淮论坛,2012(1):101-109. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-862X.2012.01.016
    [20]
    吴延溢. 居住自由权的构造逻辑及其法理阈限[J]. 南通大学学报(社会科学版),2020,36(1):66-73.
    [21]
    苏永钦. 民法典的时代意义——对中国内地民法典草案的大方向提几点看法[C]//苏永钦. 民事立法与公私法的接轨. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2005: 57-58.
    [22]
    杜强强. 合宪性解释在我国法院的实践[J]. 法学研究,2016,38(1):107-125.
    [23]
    刘树德. “裁判依据”与“裁判理由”的法理之辨及其实践样态−以裁判效力为中心的考察[J]. 法治现代化研究,2020,4(3):123-138.
    • Relative Articles

  • Relative Articles

    [1]ZHU Zufei, KANG Ming. Interpreting the Independence of Real Right Act in the Civil Code[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2023, 39(4): 486-500. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022100050
    [2]PAN Yun-hua. The Concept of “Modernization of National Governance” in Xi Jinping Thought on Rule of Law and the Norms of Civil Code[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2022, 38(2): 208-214. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2021120074
    [3]WANG Xiao. On “Subjectivity” of Sun Yat-sen's Socialist Thought[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2012, 28(1): 172-177.
    [4]DU Xiao-zhi, HE Cheng. Legislative Mode Selection of Tort Law in Civil Code System[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2010, 26(1): 80-83,107.
    [5]SONG Xiu-jian. Theoretical Contest and the Understanding and Practice of Theory——A Case Study of the Spread of Socialism Theory in China for a Century[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2010, 26(3): 112-117.
    [6]ZHU Qing-yue. On Marx's Thought Which Consolidate and Develop the Social Factors in Rural Areas of Oriental Societies—The Explanation in Marx's Letter to Vera Zasulich[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2010, 26(2): 145-150.
    [7]CHEN Xi. Sticking to the Scientific Development, Constructing a Harmonious, Democratic and Creative University Culture[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2007, 23(4): 8-11.
    [8]LI Zong-ping. Socialist Democratic Rule of Law and Socialist Harmonious Community[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2006, 22(4): 80-84.
    [9]LIU Bin-zhi. The Status and Function of Social Work in Building Harmonious Society[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2005, 21(4): 59-61.
    [10]WANG Rui-fang. On Deng Xiaoping's View of Socialism[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2004, 20(3): 68-72.
    [11]TIAN Xue-mei. Can the Market Economy Rule Replace the Moral Rule[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2001, 17(2): 5-7.
    • Supplements(0)
    • Cited By

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(4)

    1. 唐丽媛. 《民法典》居住权制度在养老领域的实施与完善. 民商法争鸣. 2024(02): 34-47 .
    2. 雷达，郑旭江. 法秩序统一视野下“个人信息”的认定——从侵犯公民个人信息罪切入. 北京科技大学学报(社会科学版). 2023(03): 310-319 .
    3. 黄忠. 从民事基本法律到基础性法律：民法典地位论. 法学研究. 2023(06): 53-72 .
    4. 潘运华. 习近平法治思想中的“国家治理现代化”法治理念与民法典规范. 北京科技大学学报(社会科学版). 2022(02): 208-214 .

    Other cited types(7)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-042025-052025-0601020304050
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 56.2 %FULLTEXT: 56.2 %META: 38.0 %META: 38.0 %PDF: 5.8 %PDF: 5.8 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 5.2 %其他: 5.2 %其他: 0.1 %其他: 0.1 %China: 0.3 %China: 0.3 %Lima: 0.7 %Lima: 0.7 %Seattle: 2.4 %Seattle: 2.4 %[]: 0.1 %[]: 0.1 %上海: 3.8 %上海: 3.8 %上饶: 0.1 %上饶: 0.1 %东莞: 0.1 %东莞: 0.1 %临汾: 0.1 %临汾: 0.1 %丽江: 0.1 %丽江: 0.1 %佛山: 0.1 %佛山: 0.1 %保定: 0.1 %保定: 0.1 %六安: 0.1 %六安: 0.1 %兰州: 0.1 %兰州: 0.1 %北京: 2.2 %北京: 2.2 %十堰: 0.1 %十堰: 0.1 %华盛顿州: 0.3 %华盛顿州: 0.3 %南京: 0.8 %南京: 0.8 %南充: 0.1 %南充: 0.1 %南宁: 0.1 %南宁: 0.1 %南昌: 0.5 %南昌: 0.5 %南通: 0.3 %南通: 0.3 %南阳: 0.1 %南阳: 0.1 %厦门: 0.2 %厦门: 0.2 %台州: 0.1 %台州: 0.1 %合肥: 0.3 %合肥: 0.3 %吕梁: 0.1 %吕梁: 0.1 %周口: 0.1 %周口: 0.1 %呼和浩特: 0.1 %呼和浩特: 0.1 %哥伦布: 0.1 %哥伦布: 0.1 %嘉兴: 0.7 %嘉兴: 0.7 %天津: 1.3 %天津: 1.3 %太原: 0.1 %太原: 0.1 %威海: 0.1 %威海: 0.1 %孝感: 0.1 %孝感: 0.1 %宁波: 0.4 %宁波: 0.4 %安庆: 0.1 %安庆: 0.1 %宣城: 0.1 %宣城: 0.1 %宿州: 0.1 %宿州: 0.1 %常州: 0.4 %常州: 0.4 %平顶山: 0.1 %平顶山: 0.1 %广州: 0.7 %广州: 0.7 %廊坊: 0.1 %廊坊: 0.1 %张家口: 2.2 %张家口: 2.2 %张家界: 0.1 %张家界: 0.1 %德阳: 0.1 %德阳: 0.1 %怀化: 0.1 %怀化: 0.1 %成都: 1.0 %成都: 1.0 %扬州: 1.0 %扬州: 1.0 %拉萨: 0.1 %拉萨: 0.1 %揭阳: 0.1 %揭阳: 0.1 %新乡: 0.1 %新乡: 0.1 %新奥尔良: 1.0 %新奥尔良: 1.0 %日喀则: 0.1 %日喀则: 0.1 %昆明: 0.9 %昆明: 0.9 %晋中: 0.1 %晋中: 0.1 %普洱: 0.4 %普洱: 0.4 %杭州: 0.7 %杭州: 0.7 %柳州: 0.1 %柳州: 0.1 %武汉: 0.4 %武汉: 0.4 %汕头: 0.1 %汕头: 0.1 %济南: 0.3 %济南: 0.3 %济宁: 0.1 %济宁: 0.1 %海北: 0.1 %海北: 0.1 %海口: 0.1 %海口: 0.1 %淄博: 0.3 %淄博: 0.3 %淮安: 0.1 %淮安: 0.1 %深圳: 0.4 %深圳: 0.4 %温州: 0.4 %温州: 0.4 %湖州: 0.1 %湖州: 0.1 %湛江: 0.1 %湛江: 0.1 %滨州: 0.1 %滨州: 0.1 %漯河: 3.0 %漯河: 3.0 %漳州: 0.1 %漳州: 0.1 %潮州: 0.1 %潮州: 0.1 %澳门: 0.1 %澳门: 0.1 %濮阳: 0.1 %濮阳: 0.1 %珠海: 0.1 %珠海: 0.1 %益阳: 0.1 %益阳: 0.1 %眉山: 0.1 %眉山: 0.1 %石家庄: 1.9 %石家庄: 1.9 %福州: 0.8 %福州: 0.8 %秦皇岛: 0.1 %秦皇岛: 0.1 %绍兴: 0.1 %绍兴: 0.1 %芒廷维尤: 12.5 %芒廷维尤: 12.5 %芝加哥: 0.9 %芝加哥: 0.9 %苏州: 0.1 %苏州: 0.1 %荆门: 0.1 %荆门: 0.1 %萍乡: 0.1 %萍乡: 0.1 %衡水: 0.1 %衡水: 0.1 %衡阳: 0.1 %衡阳: 0.1 %衢州: 0.1 %衢州: 0.1 %襄阳: 0.1 %襄阳: 0.1 %西宁: 38.7 %西宁: 38.7 %西安: 0.4 %西安: 0.4 %诺沃克: 0.1 %诺沃克: 0.1 %贵阳: 0.1 %贵阳: 0.1 %赣州: 0.4 %赣州: 0.4 %邯郸: 0.3 %邯郸: 0.3 %郑州: 1.6 %郑州: 1.6 %重庆: 1.0 %重庆: 1.0 %金华: 0.1 %金华: 0.1 %钦州: 0.1 %钦州: 0.1 %铁岭: 0.1 %铁岭: 0.1 %银川: 0.2 %银川: 0.2 %锡林郭勒盟: 0.1 %锡林郭勒盟: 0.1 %锦州: 0.1 %锦州: 0.1 %镇江: 0.2 %镇江: 0.2 %长沙: 1.2 %长沙: 1.2 %青岛: 0.1 %青岛: 0.1 %其他其他ChinaLimaSeattle[]上海上饶东莞临汾丽江佛山保定六安兰州北京十堰华盛顿州南京南充南宁南昌南通南阳厦门台州合肥吕梁周口呼和浩特哥伦布嘉兴天津太原威海孝感宁波安庆宣城宿州常州平顶山广州廊坊张家口张家界德阳怀化成都扬州拉萨揭阳新乡新奥尔良日喀则昆明晋中普洱杭州柳州武汉汕头济南济宁海北海口淄博淮安深圳温州湖州湛江滨州漯河漳州潮州澳门濮阳珠海益阳眉山石家庄福州秦皇岛绍兴芒廷维尤芝加哥苏州荆门萍乡衡水衡阳衢州襄阳西宁西安诺沃克贵阳赣州邯郸郑州重庆金华钦州铁岭银川锡林郭勒盟锦州镇江长沙青岛

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索
    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML

    Article Metrics

    Article views (504) PDF downloads(80) Cited by(11)
    Proportional views
    Related

    Copyright © Journal of Univeraity of Science and Technology Beijing.京ICP备13030111号

    Address：Room 305, Library, 30 Xueyuan Road, Haidian District, Beijing (100083)   website：https://bkds.ustb.edu.cn/   Tel：010-62334089

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co. Ltd    

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return