CHEN Yang. Characteristics of Different Text Types in Lun Yu(the Analects)[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2015, 31(2): 17-21,68.
Citation: LIU Fei-fei, CHANG Chen-guang. Discourse Strategies of Affiliating Writers with Putative Readers in Newspaper Editorials: An Individuation Perspective in Systemic Functional Linguistics[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2022, 38(1): 44-50. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2021010020

Discourse Strategies of Affiliating Writers with Putative Readers in Newspaper Editorials: An Individuation Perspective in Systemic Functional Linguistics

doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2021010020
  • Received Date: 2021-01-07
    Available Online: 2022-01-21
  • Publish Date: 2022-02-12
  • Editorial writers assume the existence of some putative readers and communicate with these readers in the writing process to influence their opinions and persuade them into the positions of the editorials. Drawing on the discourse semantic systems of appraisal and ideation and the individuation cline in Systemic Functional Linguistics, this study explores the patterns of affiliation and the strategies of affiliating with putative readers in newspaper editorials, using the editorials from China Daily as the data. The analyses show that editorial writers affiliate with the putative readers through the couplings of [attitudinal value + ideational entity], which are combined together into a syndrome of couplings through the taxonomic relations between entities, such as superordination and composition. This study develops the individuation cline and provides a new perspective for exploring the persuasive nature of editorial discourse.

     

  • [1]
    MARTIN J R & WHITE P R R. The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English [M]. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005.
    [2]
    赵民. 关于同一事件的英语社论的结尾对比分析−介入系统视角[J]. 当代外语研究,2015(4):23-28,77.
    [3]
    HALLIDAY M A K & MATTHIESSEN C M I M. An Introduction to Functional Grammar [M]. New York: Routledge, 2004.
    [4]
    刘悦明. 《人民日报》元旦社论语篇评价手段历时分析[J]. 西安外国语大学学报,2012,20(2):26-30. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-9876.2012.02.008
    [5]
    孙铭悦,张德禄. 评价策略分析框架探索−以英语社论语篇为例[J]. 外语学刊,2018(2):27-34.
    [6]
    LIU F & HOOD S. Rhetorical strategies of political persuasion: the play of irrealis and realis meaning in re/aligning readers in newspaper editorials [J]. Text & Talk, 2019, 39(5):589-613.
    [7]
    BEDNAREK M & MARTIN J R. New Discourse on Language: Functional Perspectives on Multimodality, Identity, and Affiliation [C]. London: Continuum, 2010.
    [8]
    马丁,王振华. 实现化、实例化和个性化−系统功能语言学的三种层次关系[J]. 上海交通大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2008,16(5):73-81.
    [9]
    刘飞飞,常晨光,张坤坤. 亲和关系视角下中国媒体评论中政治话语修辞研究[J]. 山东外语教学,2019,40(4):35-46.
    [10]
    MARTIN J R. Semantic variation: modelling realisation, instantiation and individuation in social semiotics [C] // BEDNAREK M & MARTIN J R. New Discourse on Language: Functional Perspectives on Multimodality, Identity, and Affiliation. London: Continuum, 2010: 1-34.
    [11]
    KNIGHT N K. Laughing Our Bonds Off: Conversational Humour in Relation to Affiliation [D]. Sydney: University of Sydney, 2010a.
    [12]
    ZAPPAVIGNA M. Ambient affiliation: a linguistic perspective on Twitter [J]. New Media & Society, 2011, 13(5):788-806.
    [13]
    ZAPPAVIGNA M & MARTIN J R. Communing affiliation: social tagging as a resource for aligning around values in social media [J]. Discourse, Context & Media, 2018(22):4-12.
    [14]
    MARTIN J R. The effability of semantic relations: describing attitude [J]. Journal of Foreign Languages, 2020, 43(6):2-20.
    [15]
    MARTIN J R. English Text: System and Structure [M]. Philadelphia: Benjamins, 1992.
    [16]
    HAO J. Analysing Scientific Discourse from a Systemic Functional Linguistic Perspective: A Framework for Exploring Knowledge Building in Biology [M]. New York: Routledge, 2020.
    [17]
    LIU F. Strategies for Affiliation in Media Editorials: Persuading and Aligning Reader [D]. Sydney: University of Technology Sydney, 2017.
    [18]
    LIU F. Lexical metaphor as affiliative bond in newspaper editorials: a systemic functional linguistics perspective [J]. Functional Linguistics, 2018, 5(1):1-14. doi: 10.1186/s40554-018-0052-1
    [19]
    MARTIN J R. Beyond exchange: appraisal systems in English [C] // HUNSTON S & THOMPSON G. Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000: 142-175.
    [20]
    MARTIN J R. Tenderness: realisation and instantiation in a Botswanan town [C] // NORGAARD N. Systemic Functional Linguistics in Use. Odense: Odense Workshop Papers in Language and Communication, 2008: 31-62.
    [21]
    CAPLE H. Reconciling the co-articulation of meaning between words and pictures: exploring instantiation and commitment in image nuclear news stories [C] // MAHBOOB A & KNIGHT N. Questioning Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2008: 77-94.
    [22]
    毛明勇,桑红艳. 人际意义视阈下新媒体语篇图文关系探究−以微信公众号China Daily文章为例[J]. 北京科技大学学报(社会科学版),2021,37(2):147-153.
    [23]
    王振华. “硬新闻”的态度研究−“评价系统”应用研究之二[J]. 外语教学,2004,25(5):31-36. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-5544.2004.05.008
    [24]
    胡壮麟. 语篇的评价研究[J]. 外语教学,2009,30(1):1-6.
    [25]
    Caribbean cooperation [N]. China Daily, 2013-06-04(08).
    [26]
    KNIGHT N K. Wrinkling complexity: concepts of identity and affiliation in humour [C] // BEDNAREK M & MARTIN J R. New Discourse on Language: Functional Perspectives on Multimodality, Identity, and Affiliation. London: Continuum, 2010b: 35-55.
    [27]
    MARTIN J R. Realisation, instantiation and individuation: Some thoughts on identity in Youth Justice Conferencing [J]. DELTA:Documentação de Estudos em Lingüística Teórica e Aplicada, 2009(25):549-583.
    [28]
    ZAPPAVIGNA M. Enacting identity in microblogging through ambient affiliation [J]. Discourse & Communication, 2014, 8(2):209-228.
    [29]
    BEDNAREK M. The Language of Fictional Television: Drama and Identity [M]. London: Continuum, 2010.
    [30]
    于洋. 微博中群体的建构: 系统功能语言学新视角[J]. 东岳论丛,2013,34(1):187-190.
    [31]
    BELL A. The Language of News Media [M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991.
    [32]
    KNOX J S. Multimodal Discourse on Online Newspaper Home Pages: A Social-semiotic Perspective [D]. Sydney: University of Sydney, 2009.
    [33]
    China-POK partnership [N]. China Daily, 2013-06-27(08).
    [34]
    Ward off capital risks [N]. China Daily, 2013-06-19(08).
  • Relative Articles

    [1]ZHANG Peiwen. Systemic Functional Linguistics and Healthcare Communication: Review and Prospect[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2024, 40(4): 75-82. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2023020077
    [2]GAO Shengwen. On the Ideological Construction of University Journal from the Perspective of Systemic Functional Linguistics[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2024, 40(2): 112-118. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2023090061
    [3]CHEN Yu-min, XU Ya-shan. The Functional Semantic Orientation of Systemic Functional Linguistics: Viewed from the History of Functional Grammar[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2023, 39(1): 90-98. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022090097
    [4]HUANG Guo-wen. What Is Systemic Functional Linguistics[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2023, 39(1): 73-89. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022100090
    [5]HE Wei, ZHONG Wei. Reconsideration of the Taxis between Clauses within the Framework of Systemic Functional Linguistics[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2023, 39(4): 431-437. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2023030024
    [6]BAO Xing-jia, LUO Zai-bing. A Logogenetic Study of Negative Polarity in English Academic Discourse: A SFL Perspective[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2022, 38(5): 533-542. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022050035
    [7]YANG Lin-xiu. Appliability of Systemic Functional Linguistics in Evidential Studies[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2022, 38(5): 517-524. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022070063
    [8]XIANG Da-jun. On the Symbiotic Thinking in Systemic Functional Linguistics[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2022, 38(5): 525-532. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022050096
    [9]LIU Yan. Readability Studies from the Perspective of Systemic Functional Linguistics[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 36(3): 11-18,27.
    [10]WANG Wen-feng, ZHANG Jing-yuan. Advances and Frontiers of Systemic Functional Linguistics Studies in China[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2019, 35(1): 24-29.
    [11]HE Wei, WEI Rong. Review of Transitivity Studies within Systemic Functional Linguistics[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2016, 32(1): 1-20.
    [12]HUI Zhang-zheng. Theory and Practice of History Discourse Analysis—from the Perspective of Systemic Functional Linguistics[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2015, 31(1): 33-38.
    [13]LI Xue-ning, FAN Xin-ying. Research on the Know ledge Representation Method of Systemic Functional Linguistics[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2015, 31(3): 26-30.
    [14]LI Zhong-hua. Research on Probability from a Systemic Functional Perspective[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2011, 27(3): 13-16.
    [15]CHANG Chen-guang, CHEN Yu-min. Systemic Functional Studies of Register[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2011, 27(3): 1-5.
    [16]GONG Zhang-hua. Genre Studies in Systemic Functional Linguistics[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2011, 27(3): 6-12.
    [17]HE Zhong-qing. Two Problems in the Classification of English Relational Processes[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2009, 25(4): 117-124.
    [18]HUANG Guo-wen. The Cardiff Grammar: a Model in Systemic Functional Linguistics[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2008, 24(1): 93-100.
    [19]HU Zhuang-lin. The Relation of Systemic Functional Linguistics to Sociolinguistics in Terms of Its Origin and Development[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2008, 24(2): 92-97.
    [20]WANG Hong-yang. The Relationships between the Cardiff Grammar and Systemic Functional Linguistics[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2008, 24(1): 117-121,134.
  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-042025-052025-062025-07050100150200
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 37.1 %FULLTEXT: 37.1 %META: 55.4 %META: 55.4 %PDF: 7.5 %PDF: 7.5 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 17.8 %其他: 17.8 %其他: 0.9 %其他: 0.9 %Central District: 0.3 %Central District: 0.3 %China: 0.4 %China: 0.4 %Grahamstown: 0.4 %Grahamstown: 0.4 %Seattle: 2.4 %Seattle: 2.4 %Slovenia: 0.1 %Slovenia: 0.1 %[]: 0.1 %[]: 0.1 %上海: 3.6 %上海: 3.6 %东京都: 0.2 %东京都: 0.2 %东莞: 0.2 %东莞: 0.2 %临汾: 0.2 %临汾: 0.2 %包头: 0.1 %包头: 0.1 %北京: 4.6 %北京: 4.6 %华盛顿州: 0.1 %华盛顿州: 0.1 %南京: 0.9 %南京: 0.9 %南宁: 0.1 %南宁: 0.1 %南昌: 0.1 %南昌: 0.1 %卢布尔雅那: 0.1 %卢布尔雅那: 0.1 %厦门: 0.1 %厦门: 0.1 %合肥: 0.1 %合肥: 0.1 %哈尔滨: 0.1 %哈尔滨: 0.1 %哥伦布: 0.1 %哥伦布: 0.1 %嘉兴: 0.1 %嘉兴: 0.1 %天津: 0.3 %天津: 0.3 %太原: 0.1 %太原: 0.1 %宣城: 0.1 %宣城: 0.1 %平顶山: 0.1 %平顶山: 0.1 %广州: 1.1 %广州: 1.1 %张家口: 2.3 %张家口: 2.3 %徐州: 0.1 %徐州: 0.1 %怀化: 0.7 %怀化: 0.7 %悉尼: 0.3 %悉尼: 0.3 %意法半: 0.1 %意法半: 0.1 %成都: 1.2 %成都: 1.2 %扬州: 0.4 %扬州: 0.4 %新奥尔良: 1.1 %新奥尔良: 1.1 %昆明: 0.7 %昆明: 0.7 %杭州: 0.1 %杭州: 0.1 %格兰特县: 0.2 %格兰特县: 0.2 %: 0.2 %: 0.2 %武汉: 0.9 %武汉: 0.9 %洛阳: 0.1 %洛阳: 0.1 %济南: 0.4 %济南: 0.4 %济宁: 0.1 %济宁: 0.1 %海德堡: 0.2 %海德堡: 0.2 %淄博: 0.1 %淄博: 0.1 %深圳: 0.1 %深圳: 0.1 %温州: 0.4 %温州: 0.4 %湛江: 0.1 %湛江: 0.1 %漯河: 0.4 %漯河: 0.4 %濮阳: 0.1 %濮阳: 0.1 %珠海: 0.1 %珠海: 0.1 %石家庄: 2.8 %石家庄: 2.8 %福州: 0.1 %福州: 0.1 %芒廷维尤: 17.3 %芒廷维尤: 17.3 %芜湖: 0.1 %芜湖: 0.1 %芝加哥: 0.9 %芝加哥: 0.9 %茂名: 0.1 %茂名: 0.1 %衢州: 0.1 %衢州: 0.1 %西宁: 27.6 %西宁: 27.6 %邯郸: 0.3 %邯郸: 0.3 %郑州: 3.8 %郑州: 3.8 %重庆: 0.1 %重庆: 0.1 %长春: 0.2 %长春: 0.2 %长沙: 0.9 %长沙: 0.9 %青岛: 0.2 %青岛: 0.2 %香港特别行政区: 0.2 %香港特别行政区: 0.2 %马鞍山: 0.1 %马鞍山: 0.1 %其他其他Central DistrictChinaGrahamstownSeattleSlovenia[]上海东京都东莞临汾包头北京华盛顿州南京南宁南昌卢布尔雅那厦门合肥哈尔滨哥伦布嘉兴天津太原宣城平顶山广州张家口徐州怀化悉尼意法半成都扬州新奥尔良昆明杭州格兰特县武汉洛阳济南济宁海德堡淄博深圳温州湛江漯河濮阳珠海石家庄福州芒廷维尤芜湖芝加哥茂名衢州西宁邯郸郑州重庆长春长沙青岛香港特别行政区马鞍山

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(1)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (748) PDF downloads(200) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return