The Chinese Solution for the Reverse Connection between Criminal and Administrative Enforcement of Minor CrimesTaking the Governance of “Excluding from Crime and Imposing Administrative Penalty” for Drunk Driving as an Entry Point
-
摘要: 2023年《关于办理醉酒危险驾驶刑事案件的意见》对“醉驾”这一典型轻罪行为统一了执法司法标准,形成了“行—刑”双向衔接、梯次递进的治理体系。轻罪行为行刑反向衔接制度可以带来“出罪入行”的积极效果,继而发挥预防犯罪与化解风险的正面治理效能,具有深厚的正当根据。当前行刑反向衔接因处罚必要性、预防有效性、制裁适法性存在实践困境易受诘问,导致反向行政处罚失去原本的治理效果,处罚公正性失准。轻罪行为行刑反向衔接应从坚持刑法谦抑性功能、坚持行政法比例性原则、实现个性到共性的类型化构建、丰富法定处罚的法律内容、完善反向衔接程序规则五个维度出发,贴近轻罪治理精细化司法需求和柔性化处罚理念,锻造出具有中国特色的轻罪治理方案。Abstract: In 2023, the “Opinions on Handling Criminal Cases of Drunk and Dangerous Driving” unified the law enforcement and judicial standards for the typical minor crime of “drunk driving” and formed a governance system with two-way connection and hierarchical progression between administrative and criminal penalties. The system of reverse connection between administrative and criminal penalties for minor crime acts can bring about the positive effect of “removing from the scope of crime and bringing into administrative punishment”, and then play the positive governance effectiveness of preventing crimes and defusing risks, which has profound legitimate grounds. Currently, the reverse connection between administrative and criminal penalties is easily questioned due to practical dilemmas in terms of the necessity of punishment, the effectiveness of prevention, and the legality of sanctions. This leads to the loss of the original governance effect of reverse administrative penalties and the inaccuracy of the fairness of punishment. The reverse connection between administrative and criminal penalties for minor crime acts should be based on five dimensions: adhering to the function of modesty and restraint of criminal law, adhering to the principle of proportionality in administrative law, realizing the typological construction from individuality to commonality, enriching the legal content of statutory penalties, and improving the procedural rules of reverse connection. It should be close to the refined judicial needs of minor crime governance and the concept of flexible punishment, and forge a minor crime governance plan with Chinese characteristics.
-
[1] 王志祥,融昊. 醉驾行为出罪路径的刑法教义学阐释[J]. 北方法学,2022,16(1):66-78. [2] 周光权. 论刑事一体化视角的危险驾驶罪[J]. 政治与法律,2022(1):14-30. [3] 松宫孝明. 刑法总论讲义(第4版补正版)[M]. 钱叶六,译. 北京:中国人民大学出版社,2013. [4] 董锐,李子瑜. 行刑反向衔接案件办理中处罚必要性审查标准的把握[J]. 中国检察官,2024(23):59-62. [5] 安婧. 醉驾严刑的政策初衷、现实困境与轻缓化治理[J]. 东岳论丛,2024,45(10):182-190. [6] 张建伟. 刑事诉讼法通义[M]. 北京:清华大学出版社,2007. [7] 融昊. “出罪入行”:醉驾行为现代化治理的新范式[J]. 江西社会科学,2023,43(7):45-55. [8] 雷雨薇. 行刑反向衔接视域下醉驾行为治理的实践路径[J]. 比较法研究,2025(1):126-146. [9] 苗生明,杨先德. 论行政犯的处罚原则及其实践[J]. 政法论坛,2023,41(2):85-96. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0208.2023.02.008 [10] 黄小龙. 轻罪时代行政出罪机制的理论塑造[J]. 重庆社会科学,2024(9):104-116. [11] 潘森林,陈帅,李新力. 不起诉案件行刑反向衔接的比较与借鉴[J]. 人民检察,2024(22):82-84. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-4043.2024.22.031 [12] 禹竹蕊,李宗侯. 论治安管理处罚中“社会服务罚”的增设[J]. 山东警察学院学报,2016,28(5):134-138. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-1565.2016.05.017 [13] 秘明杰,张婷婷. 生态环境修复责任承担方式的司法实践样态及其创新转化[J]. 南京林业大学学报(人文社会科学版),2024,24(4):89-103. [14] 张睿楠,尚帅帅. 轻罪治理视域下基层行刑反向衔接的实践检视与对策——以A市B区为例[J]. 上海公安学院学报,2024,34(6):63-71. [15] 江国华. 中国司法学[M]. 武汉:武汉大学出版社,2016. [16] 田行健. 完善我国行刑反向衔接路径思考[J]. 中国检察官,2024(18):43-46. [17] 周洁,胡坤. 轻罪时代刑事司法柔性治理[J]. 北京科技大学学报(社会科学版),2024,40(3):89-98. [18] 张伟珂. 行刑衔接机制中管辖权优先之提倡[J]. 公安学研究,2024,7(2):40-61,123-124. [19] 侯登华,赵莹雪. 相对不起诉制度的监督制约机制研究[J]. 北京科技大学学报(社会科学版),2021,37(2):160-166. [20] 樊崇义,主编. 证据法学(第6版)[M]. 北京:法律出版社,2017. [21] 汤强. 刑事证据转化为行政证据研究[J]. 广西师范学院学报(哲学社会科学版),2018,39(6):176-182. [22] 孙蕙心,刘双阳. 行刑反向衔接视角下刑事司法证据转化为行政执法证据研究[J]. 证据科学,2024,32(6):689-702. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-1226.2024.06.004 [23] 周佑勇. 习近平法治思想对推进中国式法治现代化的理论创新[J]. 学习与探索,2024(6):1-9. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-462X.2024.06.002 [24] 苗生明. 醉酒型危险驾驶的治罪与治理——兼论我国轻罪治理体系的完善[J]. 中国刑事法杂志,2024(1):3-16. -
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 396
- HTML全文浏览量: 491
- PDF下载量: 30
- 被引次数: 0
下载: