Needs and Desires: Baudrillard’s Theory of Consumer Society and Its Ecological ReflectionAn Introspection Based on Marx’s Critical Theory of Capital
-
摘要: 鲍德里亚对于消费社会的分析与批判为我们理解当代社会的消费属性提供了很好的角度。他在研究中运用了拉康关于需要与欲望的精神分析学逻辑,着重分析消费社会的结构以及这种结构在精神深处所产生的消费需求意象,将消费主义作为一种社会思潮、意识形态和生活方式进行解析。同时,鲍德里亚关于消费社会的分析中内置了对于生态问题的反思,彰显出生态批判的维度,对于今天资本主义的生态批判和绿色消费理念的建构都有一定意义。然而鲍德里亚的研究具有一定的局限性,他倒置了“生产”和“消费”,走向了后马克思主义的思潮。所以,要想彻底剖析消费社会,消弭需要异化,找到破解生态危机的关键,还要重新回到马克思的研究中去。Abstract: Baudrillard’s analysis and critique of the consumer society provides a good perspective for us to understand the attributes of consumption in contemporary society. He applies Lacan’s psychoanalytic logic of needs and desires in his research, focusing on the structure of the consumer society and the imagery of consumer demand produced by this structure in the depth of the spirit, and analyzing consumerism as a social trend, ideology and way of life. At the same time, Baudrillard’s analysis of the consumer society has built-in reflection on ecological issues, highlighting the dimension of ecological criticism, which has certain significance to the ecological criticism of today’s capitalism and the construction of the concept of green consumption. However, Baudrillard’s research has certain limitations, as he inverts “production” and “consumption” and moves towards post-Marxist thinking. Therefore, in order to thoroughly analyze the consumer society, eliminate the need for alienation, and find the key to solving the ecological crisis, it is necessary to return to Marx’s research.
-
Key words:
- Baudrillard /
- consumer society /
- ecological reflection /
- Marx /
- Lacan
-
[1] 申家字. 马克思消费理论的形成逻辑与启示[J]. 学习与探索, 2016(8): 44-48. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-462X.2016.08.006 [2] 亚当·斯密. 国民财富的性质和原因的研究(下卷)[M]. 郭大力, 王亚南, 译. 北京: 商务印书馆, 1974. [3] 詹姆斯·穆勒. 政治经济学要义[M]. 吴良健, 译. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2010. [4] 马克思, 恩格斯. 马克思恩格斯文集(第一卷)[M]. 北京: 人民出版社, 2009. [5] 让·鲍德里亚. 消费社会[M]. 刘成富, 全志钢, 译. 南京: 南京大学出版社, 2014. [6] 拉康. 拉康选集[M]. 褚孝泉, 译. 上海: 上海三联书店, 2001. [7] LACAN J. The Four Fundamental Concepts of Psychoanalysis [M]. New York: W. W. NORTON & COMPANY, 1998. [8] 黑格尔. 精神现象学(上卷)[M]. 贺麟, 王玖兴, 译. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2010. [9] KOJEVE A. Introduction to the Reading of Hegel[M]. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1980. [10] 让·鲍德里亚. 象征交换与死亡[M]. 车槿山, 译. 南京: 译林出版社, 2009. [11] LEISS W. The Limits To Satisfaction[M]. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 1988. [12] 鲍德里亚. 生产之境[M]. 仰海峰, 译. 北京: 中央编译出版社, 2005. [13] 马克思, 恩格斯. 马克思恩格斯文集(第八卷)[M]. 北京: 人民出版社, 2009. [14] 让·鲍德里亚. 符号政治经济学批判[M]. 夏莹, 译. 南京: 南京大学出版社, 2015. [15] 马克思, 恩格斯. 马克思恩格斯文集(第二卷)[M]. 北京: 人民出版社, 2009. [16] 马克思, 恩格斯. 马克思恩格斯文集(第九卷)[M]. 北京: 人民出版社, 2009. [17] 宋子铃, 王桂艳. 马克思生态思想的生成基础、核心要义及现实价值 [J]. 北京科技大学学报(社会科学版), 2024, 40 (1): 19-25. -
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 650
- HTML全文浏览量: 179
- PDF下载量: 20
- 被引次数: 0
下载: