Contract Management in Higher Education Institutions under the ‘Double First Class’ Initiative: Path Innovation and Efficiency Enhancement
-
摘要: 高校合同作为一种复杂的合同类型,不仅兼具行政合同和民事合同的特征,还涉及学术及科学研究等特殊领域的评价。高校合同管理作为高校法治的重点落地环节,既承担着“双一流”建设对高校制度理性的发展要求,又面临着合同管理统一性与自主性不平衡、事权治权分离、法治因素不足三方面的现实困境。文章从法治统领全周期的路径创新,及数据监控全过程管理的效能提升两方面进行探讨。发现通过贯穿依法治校理念、加强科研合同的功能性规制的制度建设,以及立足管理全流程构建高校合同管理制度、运用大数据思维建立合同管理信息系统、建立数据内控监督考核评价机制的方法,可以提升管理层、执行层、业务层的风险意识和专业水平,以形成有效的管理合力。Abstract: As a complex type of contract, university contracts not only have the characteristics of administrative contracts and civil contracts, but also involve the evaluation of special fields such as academic and scientific research. As a key link in the implementation of the rule of law in universities, university contract management not only undertakes the development requirements of the “Double First-Class” construction for the institutional rationality of university systems, but also faces the realistic dilemmas of unbalanced unity and autonomy of contract management, separation of administration powers and governance, and insufficient rule of law factors. The paper discusses from two aspects of path innovation of the entire cycle of the rule of law and the efficiency of the entire process of data monitoring. It was discovered that the construction of the system of governing the school through the law, strengthening the functional regulation of scientific research contracts, and the method of building a college contract management system based on the management system, using big data thinking to establish contract management information systems, and establishing data internal control supervision and evaluation mechanisms. In order to enhance the risk awareness and professional level of management, execution, and business layers to form an effective management synergy.
-
[1] 高生文. 系统功能语言学视角下高校学报 在“双一流”建设中的发展研究[J]. 北京科技大学学报(社会科学版),2018,34(2):33-39. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-2689.2018.02.006 [2] 韩宁. 政府合同管理的基本逻辑[J],交大法学,2020(4):97-106. [3] 索传军. 学术评价论[M]. 北京:科技文献出版社,2020. [4] 孟兆磊,张珊珊,何勇. 基于共享经济的高校仪器设备市场化 运营对策研究[J]. 北京科技大学学报(社会科学版),2024,40(2):63-69. [5] 沈岿. 监控者与管理者可否合一:行政法学体系转型的基础问题[J]. 中国法学,2016(1):105-125. [6] UNESCO. Education 2030:Incheon declaration and frame-work for action [EB/OL].(2015-05-03)[2024-06-14]. https://iite.unesco.org/publications/education-2030-incheon-declaration-framework-action-towards-inclusive-equitable-quality-education-lifelong-learning/. [7] 雷洪峰,周晨. 中国式现代化为世界贡献新的发展路径:演变历程、世界意义与新时代内涵[J]. 北京科技大学学报(社会科学版),2023,39(6):675-680. [8] 伯顿·克拉克. 高等教育新论[M]. 浙江:浙江教育出版社,2001. [9] 周光礼,武建鑫. 什么是世界一流学科[J]. 中国高教研究. 2016(1):65-73. [10] 张阳,金劲彪. 当代高校合规治理:要义及风险防范[J]. 教育发展研究,2023,43(9):68-77. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-3855.2023.09.010 [11] 何维兴. 内控角度下规范高校经济合同管理举措探讨[J]. 教育财会研究,2019,30(4):65-68. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-5827.2019.04.014 [12] 郭润生,邬帅莉. 论科研合同及其法律规范化[J]. 科学技术与辩证法. 1998,(4):42-48. [13] 谭启平,朱涛. 论国家科技计划项目合同的私法属性及制度构建[J]. 现代法学,2013,35(2):171-180. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-2397.2013.02.19 [14] 胡淑芬,黄志高. 跳出历史周期率“两个答案”的逻辑关系及实践要求[J]. 北京科技大学学报(社会科学版),2024,40(3):22-30. [15] 王春晖,曹越. 内部控制视角下对高校经济合同管理的思考[J]. 会计之友,2016(19):87-91. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-5937.2016.19.021 [16] 张永爱. 高校合同管理制度建设及意义探析[J]. 管理观察,2016(16):116-119. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-2877.2016.16.036 [17] 郑玮炜,孙海涛. 论高校内部治理的症结及疏解策略[J]. 江苏高教,2024(3):62-69. [18] 孙亚东. 高等学校深化贯通“纪巡财审” 协同监督的建设探究[J]. 北京科技大学学报(社会科学版),2024,40(2):56-62.
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 155
- HTML全文浏览量: 664
- PDF下载量: 13
- 被引次数: 0