意义进化视阈的词义创新探究

杨忠

doi:10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2023120106

意义进化视阈的词义创新探究

doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2023120106

杨忠

东北师范大学外国语学院，吉林长春 130024

基金项目: 国家社会科学基金一般项目“意义进化视角的英汉语法隐喻研究”（编号：12BYY008）。

详细信息

作者简介:
杨忠（1949—），吉林永吉人，东北师范大学外国语学院教授，博士生导师

中图分类号: H030
计量
- 文章访问数: 613
- HTML全文浏览量: 43
- PDF下载量: 15
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2023-03-15
- 网络出版日期: 2024-01-22
- 刊出日期: 2024-04-01

An Exploration into Lexical Semantic Innovation in Light of the Theory of Semogenesis

YANG Zhong

School of Foreign Languages & Literature, Northeast Normal University,Changchun, Jilin 130024, China

摘要

摘要: 哲学—逻辑学走向的词汇语义研究洞见了词汇意义的诸多规律。然而，这一研究范式持客观主义意义观，忽略人和语境因素，词义创新研究未受到应有重视。修辞学—民俗学走向的意义研究持经验现实主义意义观，认为意义发生发展于人与人、人与环境的互动。意义进化视阈的词义创新探究发现：词义创新是“划分”与“整合”结合的认知深化过程；文化差异导致自然语言之间的范畴精密度、模糊性、典型性不对应。语篇发生视角的词义语境化创新运用分析结果表明，词义创新发生于语篇创造过程，源于作者的创新思维，在语篇意义构建中发挥了不可或缺的作用。
- ﹝关键词﹞意义进化 /
- 词义 /
- 创新
Abstract: Studies of lexical semantics in the logico-philosophical orientation of linguistics have gained valuable insights into the regularities of lexical meaning. Nevertheless, the objectivist view of meaning that underpins these studies leads to the overlook of man and context as essential factors of meaning. Consequently, lexical semantic innovation has been given scant attention. Linguistics in the rhetorical-ethnographic orientation holds an experiential realistic view of meaning and believes that meaning arises in the interaction between individuals and between man and nature. An exploration into lexical semantic innovation in light of the theory of semogensis has found: 1) Lexical semantic innovation is a progressive cognitive process in which classification of reality and conceptual blending are combined; 2) Cultural differences give rise to non-correspondence of categories of natural languages in terms of delicacy, fuzziness and proto-typicality. It is also found, based on the co-textual and contextual analysis of novel lexical meanings, that lexical semantic innovations, which originate from the author’s creative thinking, contribute significantly to textual semantic construction.
- lexical semantics /
- innovation /
- semogenesis

HTML全文

参考文献(44)

[1]	BUNNIN N & 余纪元. 西方哲学英汉对照词典[Z]. 北京:人民出版社,2001.
[2]	伍谦光. 语义学导论[M]. 长沙:湖南教育出版社,1988.
[3]	SAEED J. Semantics [M]. Oxford:Blackwell,1997.
[4]	HALLIDAY M A K & MATTHIESSEN C M I M. Construing Experience through Meaning:A Language-based Approach to Cognition [M]. London:Cassell,1999.
[5]	LEECH G. Semantics (2nd edn.) [M]. New York:Penguin,1981.
[6]	RIEMER N. Introducing Semantics [M]. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,2010.
[7]	贾彦德. 汉语语义学[M]. 北京:北京大学出版社,1999.
[8]	WIERZBICKA A. Semantics: Primes and Universal [M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996. WIERZBICKA A. Semantics:Primes and Universal [M]. Oxford:Oxford University Press,1996.
[9]	李福印. 语义学概论 [M]. 北京:北京大学出版社,2006.
[10]	TALMY L. Towards a Cognitive Semantics [M]. Massachusetts:MIT Press,2003.
[11]	杨忠,林正军. 功能语言学语义研究范式探析[J]. 中国外语,2011,8(5):83-88. .
[12]	洪堡特. 洪堡特语言哲学文集[C]. 姚小平,译注. 长沙:湖南教育出版社,2001.
[13]	孔狄亚克. 人类知识起源论[M]. 洪洁求,洪丕,注译. 北京:商务印书馆,1997.
[14]	沃尔夫. 论语言、思维和现实[M]. 高一虹,译,长沙:湖南教育出版社,2001.
[15]	BERLIN B & KAY P. Basic Color Terms:Their Universality and Evolution [M]. Berkeley,Los Angeles:University of California Press,1969.
[16]	LUCY J. The scope of linguistic relativity:an analysis and review of empirical research [A] // CAMPERZ J & LEVISON S C. Rethinking Linguistic Relativity [C]. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1996:37-69.
[17]	LEVINSEN S C. From outer to inner space:linguistic categories and non-linguistic thinking [C] // NUYTS J & PEDERSON E. Language and Conceptualization. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press. 1997:13-45.
[18]	LAKOFF G. Women,Fire and Dangerous Things:What Categories Reveal about the Mind [M]. Chicago:Chicago University Press,1987.
[19]	王寅. 认知语言学教程[M]. 北京:北京大学出版社,2021.
[20]	亚里士多德. 范畴篇解释篇[M]. 方书春,译. 北京:商务印书馆,2008.
[21]	墨翟. 墨子[C] //齐鲁生,郭镇海,李自然,等编. 四库全书精编(子部第二十一辑). 北京:中国文史出版社,1999.
[22]	ROSCH E & MERVIS C B. Family resemblances:studies in the internal structure of categories [J]. Cognitive Psychology,1975(7):573-603.
[23]	LABOV W. The boundaries of words and their meanings [C] // FISHMAN J. New Ways of Analyzing Variation in English. Washington D C:Georgetown University Press,1973:340-373.
[24]	陈嘉映. 语言哲学[M]. 北京:北京大学出版社,2003.
[25]	LAKOFF G & JOHNSON M. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago:University of Chicago Press,1980.
[26]	TURNER M. Cognitive Dimensions of Social Science [M]. Oxford:Oxford University Press,2001.
[27]	TURNER M. The Origin of Ideas [M]. Oxford:Oxford University Press,2014.
[28]	MRTIN L R. Discourse Semantics [M]. Shanghai:Shanghai Jiao Tong University Press,2010.
[29]	CARTER R. Vocabulary:Applied Linguistics Perspectives [M]. London:Rutledge,1998.
[30]	恩格斯. 自然辩证法[M]. 中共中央编译局,译. 北京:人民出版社,1971.
[31]	赫尔德. 论语言的起源[M]. 姚小平,译. 北京:商务印书馆,2016.
[32]	维果斯基. 思维与语言[M]. 周雁翎,陈静,译. 北京:北京大学出版社,2010.
[33]	HALLIDAY M A K. How do you mean? [C] // DAVIES M & RAVELI L. Advances in Systemic Linguistics:Recent Theory and Practice. London:Pinter,1992:20-35.
[34]	HALLIDA M A K. New ways of analyzing meaning:the challenge to applied linguistics [C] // PUTZ M. Thirty Years of Linguistic Evolution. Philadelphia:John Benjamins,1992:59-98.
[35]	HALLIDAY M A K. Complementarities in Language [M]. Beijing:The Commercial Press,2008.
[36]	邢福义. 文化语言学[M]. 武汉:湖北教育出版社,2000.
[37]	王守仁. 传习录[C]//齐鲁生,郭镇海,李自然,等. 四库全书精编(子部第七辑). 北京:中国文史出版社,1999.
[38]	公孙龙. 公孙龙子[C]//齐鲁生,郭镇海,李自然,等. 四库全书精编(子部第二十一辑). 北京:中国文史出版社,1999.
[39]	孔子及其门人. 尔雅[C]//齐鲁生,郭镇海,李自然,等. 四库全书精编(经部第八辑). 北京:中国文史出版社,1999.
[40]	何九盈. 中国古代语言学史. 北京:商务印书馆,2013.
[41]	李幼蒸. 理论符号学导论[M]. 北京:社会科学文献出版社,1999.
[42]	中国社会科学院语言研究所词典编撰室. 现代汉语词典(第7版)[Z]. 北京:商务印书馆,2016.
[43]	QUIRK R,GREENBAUM S,LEECH G,et al. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language [M]. Essex,England:Longman,1985.
[44]	刘勰. 文心雕龙[C]//齐鲁生,郭镇海,李自然,等. 四库全书精编(集部第一辑). 北京:中国文史出版社,1999.