Dialectics of Digital Technology, Spiritual Politics, and Power GovernanceAn Exploration of Byung-Chul Han’s Digital Psychopolitics Thought
-
摘要: 韩炳哲通过揭橥数字时代精神权力的运作机制及功绩主体的生存境况,形成了数字精神政治思想。他宣称福柯、阿甘本等人建构的生命政治,无法接榫功绩社会的运行规则,因而必然走向“终结”,被数字精神政治代替。作为新自由主义权力治理术,数字精神政治凭依数字技术操控人的精神高地,以一种肯定、温柔的方式形塑功绩社会的文化情境,诱使功绩主体浸润在形式自由、情绪释放、精神感化、游戏体验的虚幻幸福中,忘却资本的奴役和物化,反而聚焦自身,主动优化自我,最终形成自我剥削。针对数字精神政治的全面渗透,韩炳哲提供了走向他者、去心理化和回归“痴傻”等柔性抵抗技术。韩炳哲数字精神政治思想从精神哲学的高度,提供了当代资本主义批判的重要智识来源,但仍存在主观主义、非批判的人本主义等缺陷,亟需以唯物史观和马克思主义政治经济学批判的理论武器予以回应和拨正。Abstract: Byung-Chul Han formed the digital psychopolitics thought by revealing the operation mechanism of spiritual power in the digital age and the living conditions of the meritorious subjects. He claimed that the biopolitics constructed by Foucault, Agamben and others could not align with the operating rules of meritorious societies, and therefore would inevitably come to an end, being replaced by digital psychopolitics. By manipulating the spiritual highlands of human beings with digital technology, digital psychopolitics shapes the cultural scene of meritorious society in a positive and gentle way, induces meritorious subjects to immerse themselves in the illusory happiness of formal freedom, emotional release, spiritual influence and gaming experience, and to forget the enslavement and materialization of capitaland focus on themselves, actively optimizing themselves and ultimately forming self-exploitation. In response to the comprehensive penetration of digital psychopolitics, Byung-Chul Han provides flexible resistance technologies such as moving towards the other, depsychologizing and returning to “foolishness”. Byung-Chul Han’s digital psychopolitics thought provides an important intellectual source for the critique of contemporary capitalism from the perspective of spiritual philosophy, but it still suffers from the defects of subjectivism and uncritical humanism, which urgently need to be responded and corrected with the theoretical weapons of historical materialism and the critique of Marx’s politic.
-
[1] 马歇尔·麦克卢汉. 理解媒介:论人的延伸[M]. 何道宽,译. 南京:译林出版社,2011. [2] 丹·希勒. 数字资本主义:全球市场体系的网络化[M]. 杨立平,译. 南昌:江西人民出版社,2001. [3] 乔纳森·克拉里. 24/7:晚期资本主义与睡眠的终结[M]. 许多,沈清,译. 北京:中信出版社,2015. [4] CAMP N V. From biopower to psychopower:Bernard stiegler’s pharmacology of mnemotechnologies [EB/OL]. (2012-05-09) [2023-06-01]. https://journals.uvic.ca/index.php/ctheory/article/view/14946/5842. [5] 韩炳哲. 在群中:数字媒体时代的大众心理学[M]. 程巍,译. 北京:中信出版社,2019. [6] 韩炳哲. 倦怠社会[M]. 王一力,译. 北京:中信出版社,2019. [7] FOUCAULT M. Society Must Be Defended:Lectures at the Collège de France,1975-1976 [M]. MACEY B (Trans). New York:Picador,2003. [8] HAN BYUNG-CHUL. Non-things:Upheaval in the Lifeworld [M]. STEUER D (Trans). Cambridge:UK Polity Press,2022. [9] 黑格尔. 法哲学原理[M]. 范扬,张企泰,译. 北京:商务印书馆,1979. [10] 马克思,恩格斯. 马克思恩格斯文集(第1卷)[M]. 北京:人民出版社,2009. [11] 韩炳哲. 精神政治学[M]. 关玉红,译. 北京:中信出版社,2019. [12] 米歇尔·福柯. 规训与惩罚[M]. 刘北成,杨远婴,译. 北京:三联书店,2012. [13] 汉娜·阿伦特. 人的境况[M]. 王寅丽,译. 上海:上海人民出版社,2021. [14] 韩炳哲. 暴力拓扑学[M]. 安尼,马琰,译. 北京:中信出版社,2019. [15] 韩炳哲. 透明社会[M]. 吴琼,译. 北京:中信出版社,2019. [16] ILLOUZ E. Emotions as Commodities:Capitalism,Consumption and Authenticity [M]. New York:Taylor & Francis Group,2018. [17] 米歇尔·福柯. 必须保卫社会[M]. 钱翰,译. 上海:上海人民出版社,1999. [18] 孙亮. 马克思主义政治经济学批判语境中的“精神政治学”[J]. 求索,2020(4):63-71. [19] GRINCHEVA N. ‘Psychopower ’of Cultural Diplomacy in the Information Age [M]. Los Angeles:Figueroa Press,2013. [20] 韩炳哲. 他者的消失[M]. 吴琼,译. 北京:中信出版社,2019. [21] 关巍. 他者的消失与自我的毁灭—韩炳哲论资本宰制下数字化时代的人类命运[J]. 马克思主义与现实,2021(6):119-124. [22] 马克思,恩格斯. 马克思恩格斯全集(第26卷·第1册)[M]. 北京:人民出版社,1972. [23] 林扬千. 关于大数据意识形态问题的思考:“数字利维坦”的生成与治理[J]. 北京科技大学学报(社会科学版),2021,37(5):576-582. [24] 费尔巴哈. 费尔巴哈哲学著作选集(上卷)[M]. 荣震华,李金山,译. 北京:商务印书馆,1984. [25] 马克思,恩格斯. 马克思恩格斯文集(第8卷)[M]. 北京:人民出版社,2009. [26] 大卫·哈维. 新自由主义简史[M]. 王钦,译. 上海:上海译文出版社,2016. [27] 吴大娟,薛俊强. 从“范畴诡辩”到“资本批判”:恩格斯对古典政治经济学贫困理论的超越[J]. 社会主义研究,2023(1):3 2-39. [28] 伊林·费彻尔. 马克思与马克思主义:从经济学批判到世界观[M]. 赵玉兰,译. 北京:北京师范大学出版社,2009.
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 680
- HTML全文浏览量: 74
- PDF下载量: 35
- 被引次数: 0