Research on the Application and Improvement of Family Education Order from the Perspective of Public Power InterventionAlso on the Forty-ninth Article of Family Education Promotion Act
-
摘要: 家庭教育经历了从着重权利到强调责任、从纯属私务到公私兼具的属性转变，为公权力介入家庭教育提供了理论基础。家庭教育令是以公权力引导和规范家庭教育的典型令状，其以《家庭教育促进法》为依托，由司法机关于实践中所创设。当前我国家庭教育令的适用在启动上具有明显的附带性和被动性，在文书样式上面临着与家庭教育指导令、督促监护令的混同，同时对拒不履行的法律后果亦存在设定不当。促进家庭教育令制度的完善，可从形式规范化和实质优化双管齐下，前者通过完善制发机制、促进文本的规范统一来实现，对于后者则应理性看待家庭教育主体责任属性，在既有法律体系内寻求妥善执行措施。Abstract: Family education has experienced the transformation from emphasizing rights to emphasizing responsibilities, from purely private affairs to both public and private affairs. It provides a theoretical basis for public authorities to intervene in family education. The Family Education Order is a typical writ based on the Family Education Promotion Act and created in practice by the judiciary to guide and regulate family education by public authorities. Currently, the application of The Family Education Order in China is obviously incidental and passive in its initiation. Also, it is confusing with the family education guidance order and supervision and guardianship order, and there is also an improper setting of the legal consequences of refusing to fulfil the order. To improve the family education order system, a two-pronged approach can be taken to standardize the form and optimize the substance, with the former being achieved by improving the mechanism for issuing the order and promoting the standardization of the text, while the latter should be viewed rationally in terms of the attributes of the responsibility of the main body of the family education. Appropriate measures for its implementation should be sought within the existing legal system.
-
[1] 张勇,蔡淑敏. 中华人民共和国家庭教育促进法释义[M]. 北京:中国法制出版社,2021. [2] 叶强. 论国家对家庭教育的介入[M]. 北京:北京大学出版社,2018. [3] 李伟,孔凡靖. 家庭教育权在预防未成年人沉迷网络行为中的实现路径——以《家庭教育促进法》第二十二条为中心[J]. 北京科技大学学报(社会科学版),2022,38(6):695-705. [4] 唐冬平. 家国关系在教育法秩序中的规范化——由《中华人民共和国家庭教育促进法》切入[J]. 新文科教育研究,2022(1):93-109,143. [5] 刘丽,邵彤. 我国家庭教育地方立法的经验与不足——兼评《中华人民共和国家庭教育法(草案)》[J]. 湖南师范大学教育科学学报,2021,20(3):46-54. [6] 李健,薛二勇,张志萍. 家庭教育法的立法议程、价值、原理与实施[J]. 北京师范大学学报(社会科学版),2022(1):62-71. [7] 刘晓巍,赵非. 从父母权利到教育能力:家庭教育立法之基[J]. 中国教育学刊,2021(8):20-25. [8] 于瑞荣. 青海发出首份“家庭教育令”[N]. 青海日报,2022-3-14(06). [9] 江西省兴国县人民法院. 兴国县兴江乡人民政府与李海生侵权责任纠纷一审民事裁定书[EB/OL]. (2020-03-04)[2023-3-20]. https://tjlx.pkulaw.com/pfnl/a6bdb3332ec0adc411e3587e175ed4175b1ea7ecd83eae41bdfb.html?way=textRightFblx. [10] 刘宗珍. 家庭教育指导令的规范统一[N]. 人民法院报,2022-6-23(08). [11] 李泊毅. 家庭教育指导令的规范化[J]. 预防青少年犯罪研究,2022(3):4-13. [12] 陈绪厚,张珂. 有“牙齿”的《家庭教育令》要落地还需更“主动”[EB/OL]. (2022-1-15)[2023-3-16]. https://www.thepaper.cn/newsDetail_forward_16301836. [13] 张时贵. 督促监护令:法理基础与制度完善建议[N]. 检察日报,2020-5-11(003). [14] 赵蔚. 家庭教育令实践运行机制的路径规制与完善——以 1015 份家庭教育令为分析样本[J]. 法律适用,2023(1):150-162. [15] 李声高. 执行难的民刑交叉治理路径反思——以终本程序与拒执罪关系为切入点[J]. 法学评论. 2019,37(2):186-196. [16] 姜博文、张校毓. 15岁少年飙车撞死人,判案法官释疑:家庭教育令管用吗?[EB/OL]. (2022-05-12)[2023-3-23]. http://www.infzm.com/contents/227975?source=131. [17] 潘士君. 当代家庭教育[M]. 沈阳:东北大学出版社,2016. [18] 徐艳红. 全国政协委员李颖:将家庭教育令纳入刑法“人民法院的判决、裁定”范畴[N]. 人民政协报,2022-3-15(012). [19] 林建军. 《家庭教育促进法》的权利基础及其体系展开[J]. 中国社会科学院大学学报,2022,42(7):37-52,141. [20] 李琦. 以组合设置重构专门学校教育矫治[N]. 检察日报,2021-05-07(03). -
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 663
- HTML全文浏览量: 61
- PDF下载量: 14
- 被引次数: 0
下载:
