Reconsideration of the Taxis between Clauses within the Framework of Systemic Functional Linguistics
-
摘要: 目前，系统功能语言学领域对于小句配列关系的讨论主要基于悉尼模式，文章指出配列关系的理据建立在级阶假说上，而悉尼模式的强级阶假说具有内在矛盾性，依此划分的小句类型及建立的配列关系具有不完整性。通过对比，文章认为加的夫模式的弱级阶假说更具合理性，据此对小句类型及小句配列关系的描述更系统、更完整；在配列关系中，由于语义配置角色、限定性以及逻辑语义关系这三大因素的制约，小句的嵌入性呈现出一个由强到弱的连续统，当嵌入性零化时，小句构成并列关系，并列关系呈现出一个由紧到松的连续统。Abstract: In the field of Systemic Functional Linguistics, current researches of the taxis between clauses have been mainly based on the Sydney Model. It is argued in this paper that due to the contradictions between the doctrines of the strong rank scale hypothesis assumed by the Sydney Model, the classifications of the clause types are problematic. By comparison, the weak rank scale hypothesis proposed in the Cardiff Model is more reasonable and the descriptions of the clause types are more systematic and comprehensive. As to the overall tactic relations of language, this paper agrees with the Cardiff Model that there are two types – embedding and paratactic. Furthermore, it is demonstrated in this paper that due to the restraints of semantic configuration roles, finiteness, and logic-semantic relations, all the embedded clauses form a continuum with those characterized by the stronger embedding power and those characterized by the weaker power as two poles. Meanwhile, all the coordinate clauses form a similar continuum with those featured by the closer logic-semantic relation and those featured by the looser relation as two poles.
-
Key words:
- Systemic Functional Linguistics /
- rank scale hypothesis /
- taxis /
- clause type
-
[1] HALLIDAY M A K. An Introduction to Functional Grammar [M]. London: Arnold, 1985. [2] HALLIDAY M A K. An Introduction to Functional Grammar (2nd ed.)[M]. London: Arnold, 1994. [3] HALLIDAY M A K & MATTHIESSEN C. An Introduction to Functional Grammar (3rd ed.) [M]. London: Arnold, 2004. [4] HALLIDAY M A K & MATTHIESSEN C. Halliday’s Introduction to Functional Grammar (4th ed.) [M]. London: Routledge, 2014. [5] 曾蕾,朱薪羽,叶岚. 投射概念隐喻在本科毕业论文中的意义实现机制探讨−以文献综述章节为例[J]. 北京科技大学学报(社会科学版),2022,38(2):162-171. [6] 张春燕. 拓扑学视角下的小句复合体研究[J]. 现代外语,2016,39(3):346-357,438. [7] 何伟,程铭. 生态语言学视角下的逻辑关系系统[J]. 解放军外国语学院学报,2021,44(3):51-59,160. [8] 王全智. 小句复合体与复句的比对研究[J]. 外语与外语教学,2008,236(11):9-12. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-6038.2008.11.003 [9] 何伟,刘佳欢. 英汉语小句间逻辑语义关系及表征方式对比研究[J]. 北京科技大学学报(社会科学版),2019,35(2):1-17. [10] 何伟,邓若晨. 现代汉语“来”“去”的功能视角研究[J]. 外语研究,2019,36(3):31-35. [11] FAWCETT R P. A Theory of Syntax for Systemic Functional Linguistics[M]. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins, 2000. [12] HALLIDAY M A K. Categories of the theory of grammar [J]. Word, 1961(17):241-292. [13] MATTHEWS P H. The concept of rank in ‘Neo-Firthian’ grammar [J]. Journal of Linguistics 1966, 2（1）: 101-109. [14] 杨炳钧. 英语非限定小句之系统功能语言学研究[M]. 北京: 外语教学与研究出版社, 2003. [15] FAWCETT R P. Invitation to Systemic Functional Linguistics through the Cardiff Grammar: An Extension and Simplification of Halliday’s Systemic Functional Grammar [M]. London: Equinox, 2008. [16] 何伟, 高生文, 贾培培, 等. 汉语功能句法分析[M]. 北京: 外语教学与研究出版社, 2015. [17] 何伟, 张敬源, 张娇, 等. 英语功能句法分析[M]. 北京: 外语教学与研究出版社, 2015. [18] 何伟,仲伟. 汉语非限定小句之功能研究[J]. 语文研究,2018,148(3):8-14. [19] 何伟,仲伟. 英汉非限定小句之功能视角对比研究[J]. 外语教学理论与实践,2019,167(3):41-49. [20] 何伟. 语法描写与分析有机观[J]. 外语教学理论与实践,2021,175(3):12-25. [21] 何伟,仲伟. 系统功能语法视角下汉语小句的限定与非限定之分[J]. 外语教学,2017,38(5):7-12. [22] 何伟, 张瑞杰, 淡晓红, 等. 英语功能语义分析[M]. 北京: 外语教学与研究出版社, 2017. -
下载:
点击查看大图
图(4)
计量
- 文章访问数: 246
- HTML全文浏览量: 171
- PDF下载量: 11
- 被引次数: 0
