Localization of the Portability Right of Personal Health Data
-
摘要: 数据可携权的提法源自欧盟2016年《通用数据保护条例》,出于健康医疗领域数据来源者权利保护与数据资源共享的需求,我国也存在设立个人健康医疗数据可携权的现实必要性,但该权利设立面临立法、司法与数据安全方面的障碍。我国《个人信息保护法》第四十五条第三款首次规定了个人信息携带权,但仅作原则性规定,为个人健康医疗数据适用该条款留下了解释空间。信息与数据虽然存在内容与形式的区别,但根据有关理论与实践,将个人健康医疗数据归入可携权的客体范畴具有一定合理性与可行性。因此,建议参照适用《个人信息保护法》个人信息携带权的规定,并通过部门规章和司法解释明晰个人健康医疗数据可携权的行使条件和健康医疗数据安全保障义务,从而推进我国个人健康医疗数据可携权的设立及保障。Abstract: The formulation of data portability right originated from the 2016 General Data Protection Regulation of the European Union. In order to protect the rights of data source and share the data resources in the field of health and medical care, it is necessary to establish the personal health data portability right in China. However, the creation of this right faces legislative, judicial and data security obstacles. Personal Information Protection Law of the People’s Republic of China stipulates the personal information portability right for the first time in Article 45(3). However, the provision only stipulates the principle, and leaves room for interpreting its application to personal health and medical data. Despite differences between information and data in content and form, it is reasonable and feasible to classify personal medical data as the object of portability. Therefore, the study suggests to refer to the provisions on the personal information portability right in Personal Information Protection Law of the People’s Republic of China. Moreover, it should clarify the conditions for exercising the portability right of personal health and medical data and the obligations of guaranteeing health and medical data security through departmental rules and judicial interpretations. In this way, the establishment and protection of the portability right of personal health and medical data can be promoted.
-
[1] MALGIERI G & COMANDE G. Sensitive-By-Distance:Quasi-Health Data in the Algorithmic Era [J]. Information & Communications Technology Law, 2017, 26(3):1-21. [2] CHASSAN G,SOUTHERINGTON T,TZORTZATOU O,et al. Data portability in health research and biobanking:legal benchmarks for appropriate implementation. [J]. European Data Protection Law Review, 2018, 4(3):296-307. doi: 10.21552/edpl/2018/3/8 [3] DIKER V A. The right to data portability in the GDPR:What lessons can be learned from the EU experience? [J]. Journal of Internet Law, 2018, 21(7):12-21. [4] VAN D A B. How to attribute the right to data portability in Europe:A comparative analysis of legislations [J]. Computer law & security review, 2017, 33(1):57-72. [5] ROSENBLOOM S T, SMITH J R L, BOWEN R, et al. Updating HIPAA for the electronic medical record era[J]. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. 2019, 26(10): 1115-1119. [6] HERT P D,PAPAKONSTANTINOU V,MALGIERI G,et al. The right to data portability in the GDPR:Towards user-centric interoperability of digital services [J]. Computer Law & Security Review, 2018, 34(2):193-203. [7] AHLBRANDT J,BRAMMEN D,MAJEED R W,et al. Balancing the need for big data and patient data privacy—an iT infrastructure for a decentralized emergency care research database [J]. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 2014(205):750-754. [8] FOLLANSBEE N M. Implications of the health information portability and accountability act[J]. The Journal of Nursing Administration. 2002, 32(1): 42–47. [9] 卓力雄. 数据携带权:基本概念,问题与中国应对[J]. 行政法学研究,2019,118(6):129-144. [10] 冉从敬,张沫. 欧盟GDPR中数据可携权对中国的借鉴研究[J]. 信息资源管理学报,2019,9(2):25-33,45. [11] 谢琳,曾俊森. 数据可携权之审视[J]. 电子知识产权,2019,326(1):28-39. [12] 尚海涛. 论我国数据可携权的和缓化路径[J]. 科技与法律,2020,143(1):86-94. [13] 刘士国. 患者隐私权:自己决定权与个人信息控制权[J]. 社会科学,2011,370(6):96-100. [14] 高富平,余超. 欧盟数据可携权评析[J]. 大数据,2016,2(4):102-107. [15] 单勇. 健康码应用的正当性及其完善[J]. 中国行政管理,2021,431(5):53-60. [16] 付新华. 数据可携权的欧美法律实践及本土化制度设计[J]. 河北法学,2019,37(8):157-168. [17] 何渊. 数据法学[M]. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2020. [18] 程啸. 《个人信息保护法》理解与适用[M]. 北京: 中国法制出版社, 2021. [19] STEFAN W. Privacy threat model for data portability in social networks applications [J]. International Journal of Information Management, 2009, 29(4):249-254. doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2009.03.007 [20] 高雪娟. 电子病历运用中的医患权利冲突及其法律规制[J]. 苏州大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2019,40(3):83-91,192. [21] 邢会强. 论数据可携权在我国的引入−以开放银行为视角[J]. 政法论丛,2020,195(2):14-24. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-6274.2020.02.002 [22] KATHLEEN L,DAVID A S & ANNEKE L. Patient data ownership:who owns your health? [J]. Journal of Law and the Biosciences, 2021, 8(1):10-11. [23] 钱亚芳. 大数据时代个人健康数据法律规制[M]. 北京: 中国社会科学出版社, 2018. [24] 杨春治. 利益平衡视角下我国病历制度中的权利义务关系[J]. 福建医科大学学报(社会科学版),2017,18(1):22-25. [25] 彭诚信,杨思益. 论数据、信息与隐私的权利层次与体系建构[J]. 西北工业大学学报(社会科学版),2020,144(2):79-89. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-2447.2020.02.011 [26] 梅夏英. 数据的法律属性及其民法定位[J]. 中国社会科学,2016,249(9):164-183,209. [27] 郑彦宁,化柏林. 数据、信息、知识与情报转化关系的探讨[J]. 情报理论与实践,2011,34(07):1-4. [28] 李爱君. 数据权利属性与法律特征[J]. 东方法学,2018,63(3):64-74. [29] 张红. 我国法律文本中的“数据”:语义、规范及其谱系[J]. 比较法研究,2022,183(5):61-74. [30] 何金海. 论我国个人信息可携带权的客体范围[J]. 山东科技大学学报(社会科学版),2022,24(2):66-74. [31] 金耀. 数据可携权的法律构造与本土构建[J]. 法律科学(西北政法大学学报),2021,39(4):105-116. [32] 郑晓剑. 论《个人信息保护法》与《民法典》之关系定位及规范协调[J]. 苏州大学学报(法学版),2021,8(4):55-63. [33] 姜雯. 中美加三国健康信息保护与共享的法制比较与启示[J]. 图书馆,2021,323(8):33-41. [34] 林婧,陈琳. 网络广告屏蔽行为性质认定中利益衡量方法的适用改进[J]. 北京科技大学学报(社会科学版),2020,36(4):79-87. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-2689.2020.04.011 [35] 康兰平,程文文. 数据可携带权在欧美法律实践上的权利要旨对我国个人信息权益保护的借鉴[J]. 电子知识产权,2022,364(3):65-77. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-9517.2022.03.005
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 258
- HTML全文浏览量: 109
- PDF下载量: 17
- 被引次数: 0