Abstract: The realization of incentive function of corporate criminal compliance derived from criminal policy should not contradict the principle of criminal law and should pass the test of criminal doctrine. The premise of realizing the incentive function of corporate criminal compliance is to clarify the connotation of organizational responsibility whose essence is to realize the separation of the responsibilities of enterprises and natural persons. It requires enterprises to assume the responsibility for the actual harm of existing results rather than the compliance itself or the abstract risks caused by non-compliance. It also requires the intentional or negligent nature of unit crimes. At the entity level, the ex-ante compliance can negate the establishment of a crime from the aspects of constitutive requirement or responsibility according to different circumstances. Under the circumstance that ex-ante compliance cannot negate the establishment of a crime, ex-ante compliance and ex-post compliance are both used as sentencing factors to reduce criminal responsibility from the punishment of responsibility, and to reduce criminal responsibility from the prevention of punishment. At the procedural level, the nature of the conditional non-prosecution of criminal compliance is the transformation of legal liability driven by criminal policy, and its legitimacy originates from the external two-way connection between criminal doctrine and criminal policy.