Consummation and Remedy: Reflection on the Judicial Application of the Sentencing Suggestions of Guilty and Acceptance of Punishment
-
摘要: 认罪认罚从宽制度的司法适用离不开检察院和法院的配合,其中检察院提供的量刑建议对于审判结果具有重要的参考价值。通过对北京地区2017—2018年公开的适用认罪认罚从宽制度裁判文书的分析,其中量刑建议被拒绝后审判结果更轻,倾向于采用矫正刑,并且对最终的审判结果更加慎重。在量刑建议的司法适用过程中,体现了按犯罪嫌疑人区分量刑建议、提供理由、完善法院的自由裁量权的优势,同时也暴露了量刑建议格式化、幅度过大以及违反客观规律的弊端。对于量刑建议,应该从文书样式、衡量标准以及规范幅度入手,辅以值班律师的加入,进行优化。对于量刑建议被否决后救济程序的构建,应该让法院予以说明并且构建通畅的检方救济渠道。Abstract: The judicial application of the lenient system of admission of guilt and acceptance of punishment cannot be separated from the cooperation of the procuratorate and the court, and the sentencing suggestions provided by the procuratorate are of great reference value to the judgment results.Through the analysis of the judgment documents on the application of leniency system of admission of guilt and punishment in the public in 2017-2018 in Beijing, after the sentencing suggestions are rejected, and the trial result is lighter, more inclined to adopt correction punishment and the final trial result is more cautious.In the judicial application of sentencing suggestions, it embodies the advantages of distinguishing people, providing reasons and improving the court's discretion, at the same time, it also exposed the disadvantages of the formatting, excessive range and violation of objective laws.For the perfection of sentencing suggestions, we should start from the document style, measurement standard and standard range, supplemented by the entry of the duty lawyer.As for the construction of the relief procedure after the sentencing suggestions are rejected, the court should give an explanation and construct an unobstructed prosecution relief channel.
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 245
- HTML全文浏览量: 26
- PDF下载量: 11
- 被引次数: 0