Division and Cooperation: Relationship between the Subject and Object in Civil Evidence-collecting Procedure
-
摘要: 民事诉讼证据收集的主体包括当事人、代理律师、法院三者,而并不包括检察机关。在证据收集程序中,当事人居于主导地位,代理律师发挥着重要的补充作用,而法院则对当事人取证行为予以阐明和指导,并可弥补当事人取证能力之不足。证据收集主体与对象之间的关系应定位于分工与协作,其中分工是前提,协作是本质与核心。证据收集程序中的协作具有双重内涵,其中证据收集主体与对象之间的协作更具有实质意义。证据收集主体与对象所负协作义务的法理依据各有不同,但其共同的深层依据则在于诉讼各方主体所负的“诉讼协力义务”。诉讼模式从“辩论主义”向“协同主义”转变的历史背景,为各主体在证据收集领域的“诉讼协力义务”奠定了正当性基础。Abstract: The subjects of civil evidence collection should include the parties, the counsels and the judges, but should not include the procurators.The parties should be dominant in the evidence-collecting process;the evidence-collecting acts of the counsels are important complement to the parties' ability to collect evidence;and the court's investigation and evidence collection is also essential.This paper defines the relationship between the subject and the object as that of division and cooperation: division is the prerequisite and cooperation is the essence and core.Cooperation in evidence collection process has double meanings, but the collaboration between the subject and the object is more meaningful.The legal basis for subject and object's cooperation obligations are different, but the common basis for cooperation lies in "duty to collaborate" theory.In the context of litigation model's transformation from "principle of debate" to cooperationism, the "duty to collaborate" theory lays a profound foundation for legitimacy.
-
Key words:
- civil litigation /
- evidence collection /
- division and cooperation
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 319
- HTML全文浏览量: 45
- PDF下载量: 30
- 被引次数: 0