基于TPB理论下绿色农产品购买行为的影响研究

陈良敏

基于TPB理论下绿色农产品购买行为的影响研究

陈良敏

中南财经政法大学工商管理学院, 武汉 430073

详细信息

作者简介:
陈良敏(1988-),女,广西南宁人,中南财经政法大学博士研究生。

中图分类号: F323
计量
- 文章访问数: 401
- HTML全文浏览量: 96
- PDF下载量: 31
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2018-03-06
- 网络出版日期: 2021-06-01

Theory of Planned Behavior Approach to Understand the Determinants of Green Agricultural Products Purchasing Behavior

CHEN Liang-min

School of Business Administration, Zhongnan University of Economics and Law, Wuhan 430073, China

摘要

摘要: 文章基于计划行为理论(TPB)及相关理论拓展研究，构建了绿色农产品购买行为影响研究框架，采用单因素方差分析和Logit模型就消费者风险偏好、健康意识、支付意愿、行为与意识一致性、消费者个体特征和家庭特征对消费者绿色农产品购买行为的影响进行研究。研究结果显示：绿色农产品购买行为在男性和女性群体存在明显差异；健康意识和支付意愿具有显著正相关作用，且女性模型更显著；男性存在意识和行为不一致的现象，以至于反向选择，对绿色农产品购买具有显著负作用；家庭特征比个体特征对消费者购买绿色农产品行为更具有显著作用，女性且与小孩同住的消费者购买行为相应增加，而独居群体购买倾向较差。
- 风险偏好 /
- 健康意识 /
- 意识和行为不一致 /
- 计划行为理论
Abstract: Based on the theory of planned behavior (TPB) and some related research, this study creates a framework to understand green farm products purchasing behavior. By using the single factor analysis of variance and Logit model, this paper studies the influence of consumer risk preference, health consciousness, willingness to pay premium, behavior and consciousness consistency, consumer individual characteristics and characteristics of family on consumer green agricultural products purchasing behavior. We find that there are significant difference between male and female groups, and health consciousness and willingness to pay premium have significant positive correlation to consumer green agricultural products purchasing behavior especially for women. Men show consciousness and behavior inconsistency which has significant negative effect on green agricultural products purchasing. The family characteristics of consumer have more significant effect on green agricultural products purchasing than individual characteristics. Women living with children increase green purchasing, but people living alone do the opposite.
- risk preference /
- health consciousness /
- behavior and consciousness consistency /
- theory of planned behavior

HTML全文

参考文献(27)

[1]	Liobikienè, G., Mandravickaitè, J. & Bernatonienè, J. Theory of planned behavior approach to understand the green purchasing behavior in the EU: a cross-cultural study[J]. Ecological Economics, 2016, 125: 38-46.
[2]	Elliott, R. The taste for green: the possibilities and dynamics of status differentiation through“green”consumption[J]. Poetics, 2013, 41(3):294-322.
[3]	徐盛国, 楚春礼, 鞠美庭, 等. “绿色消费”研究综述[J]. 生态经济, 2014, 30(7):65-69.
[4]	Mostafa, M. M. Gender differences in Egyptian consumers’ green purchase behaviour: the effects of environmental knowledge, concern and attitude[J]. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 2007, 31(3):220-229.
[5]	Paul, J., Modi, A. & Patel, J. Predicting green product consumption using theory of planned behavior and reasoned action[ J]. Journal of Retail and Consumer Serices, 2016, 29:123-134.
[6]	Petrolia, D. R. Risk preferences, risk perceptions, and risky food[J]. Food Policy, 2016, 64:37-48.
[7]	Yeonshin, K. Understanding green purchase: the influence of collectivism, personal values and environmental attitudes, and the moderating effect of perceived consumer effectiveness[J]. Seoul Journal of Business, 2011, 17(1):65-92.
[8]	Liobikienè, G. & Bernatonienè, J. Why determinants of green purchase cannot be treated equally? The case of green cosmetics: Literature review[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2017, 162: 109-120.
[9]	Yadav, R. & Pathak, G. S. Determinants of consumers green purchase behavior in a developing nation: applying and extending the theory of planned behavior[J]. Ecological Economics, 2017, 134:114-122.
[10]	Dagher, G. K. & Itani, O. Factors in fluencing green purchasing behaviour: empirical evidence from the Lebanese consumers[ J]. Journal of Consumer Behavior, 2014, 13(3): 188-195.
[11]	Braimah, M. Green brand awareness and customer purchase intention[J]. Management Science Letters, 2015, 5(10):895-902.
[12]	Joshi, Y. Rahman, Z. Factors affecting green purchase behaviour and future research directions [J]. International Strategic Management Review, 2015, 3(1-2):128-143.
[13]	劳可夫, 吴佳. 基于Ajzen计划行为理论的绿色消费行为的影响机制[J]. 财经科学, 2013, (2):91-100.
[14]	王财玉, 雷雳, 吴波. 时间参照对绿色消费的影响:价值偏好的中介作用[J]. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2017, (3):422-425.
[15]	Ajzen, I. The theory of planned behavior[J]. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1991, 50(2):179-211.
[16]	Ajzen, I. Attitudes, traits, and actions: dispositional prediction of behavior in personality and social psychology[J]. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 1987, 20:1-63.
[17]	Doorn, J. V. Verhoef, P. C. Willingness to pay for organic products: differences between virtue and vice foods[J]. In International Journal of Research in Marketing, 2011, 28(3):167-180
[18]	Chen, M. F. & Tung, P. J. Developing an extended theory of planned behavior model to predict consumers’ intention to visit green hotels[J]. In International Journal of Hospitality Management, 2014, 36: 221-230.
[19]	Chen, Y. S. & Chang, C. H. Enhance green purchase intentions: the roles of green perceived value, green perceived risk, and green trust [J]. Management Decision, 2012, 50 (3):502-520.
[20]	赵卫红, 刘秀娟. 消费者对可追溯性蔬菜的购买意愿的实证研究[J]. 农村经济, 2013, (1):56-59.
[21]	Gleim, M. R., Smith, J. S., Andrew, D., & Jr. Cronin J. J. Against the green: a multi-method examination of the barriers to green consumption[J]. Journal of Retailing, 2013, 89(1):44-61.
[22]	Shen, J. Understanding the determinants of consumers’ willingness to pay for eco-labeled products: an empirical analysis of the China environmental label[J]. Journal of Service Science and Management, 2012, 5: 87-94.
[23]	王建明. 资源节约意识对资源节约行为的影响——中国文化背景下一个交互效应和调节效应模型[J]. 管理世界, 2013, (8):77-90, 100.
[24]	尹永超. 国民环境意识与环境行为的不一致性及其疏导——基于社会心理学的分析[J]. 经营管理者, 2012, (10):8-9.
[25]	刘文兴, 汪兴东, 陈昭玖. 农村居民生态消费意识与行为的一致性研究——基于江西生态文明先行示范区的调查[J]. 农业经济问题, 2017, (9):37-49.
[26]	韩青. 消费者对安全认证农产品自述偏好与现实选择的一致性及其影响因素——以生鲜认证猪肉为例[J]. 中国农村观察, 2011, (4):2-13.
[27]	Lönnqvist, J. E., Verkasalo, M., Walkowitz, G. & Wichardt, P. C. Measuring individual risk attitudes in the lab: task or ask? An empirical comparison[J]. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 2015, 119:254-266.