留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

基于语料库比较规则竞争模型和单词规则模型

赵亮

赵亮. 基于语料库比较规则竞争模型和单词规则模型[J]. 北京科技大学学报(社会科学版), 2017, 33(4): 32-37.
引用本文: 赵亮. 基于语料库比较规则竞争模型和单词规则模型[J]. 北京科技大学学报(社会科学版), 2017, 33(4): 32-37.
ZHAO Liang. Comparison of Rules and Competition Model and Words and Rules Model[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2017, 33(4): 32-37.
Citation: ZHAO Liang. Comparison of Rules and Competition Model and Words and Rules Model[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2017, 33(4): 32-37.

基于语料库比较规则竞争模型和单词规则模型

基金项目: 

教育部人文社会科学规划项目(编号为12YJC740147)部分研究成果。

详细信息
    作者简介:

    赵亮(1981-),女,江苏徐州人,北京科技大学外国语学院副教授。

  • 中图分类号: H0

Comparison of Rules and Competition Model and Words and Rules Model

  • 摘要: 在语言习得领域,动词习得一直是备受争议的关键问题之一,尤其是英语动词过去式的习得机制。Yang提出的规则竞争模型(Rules and Competition Model)和Pinker提出的单词规则模型(Words and Rules Model)是其中比较有影响力的理论模型。文章分析了这两个理论模型的基本原理和习得机制,比较其异同点,并通过CHILDES语料库中儿童语言习得的真实语料来验证其解释力。结果显示:规则竞争模型更好地解释了输入频率的作用、动词和过去式的相似性和过度规则化错误;而单词竞争模型在解释不规则动词过去式成因方面表现得更好。

     

  • [1] Berko, J. The child's learning & English morphology[J]. Word, 1958, 14(3-4):150-177.
    [2] Marcus, G. F., Pinker, S., Ullman, M., Hollander, M., Rosen, T. J. & Xu, F. Over-regulations in language acquisition[J]. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 1992, 57(4):1-165.
    [3] Chomsky, N.& Halle, M. The Sound Pattern of English[M]. Cambridge, MA:MIT Press, 1968.
    [4] Halle, M. & Mohanan, K. P. Segmental phonology of modern English[J]. Linguistic Inquiry, 1985, 16(1):57-116.
    [5] Halle, M. & Marantz, A. Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection[A]. In Hale, K. & Keyser, S. J. (eds.). The View From Building20:Essays in Linguistics in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger[C]. Cambridge, MA:MIT Press, 1993:111-176.
    [6] Yang, C.Knowledge and Learning in Natural Language[M]. Oxford:Oxford University Press, 2002.
    [7] Yang, C.The Infinite Gift:How Children Learn and Unlearn the Languages of the World[M]. New York:Scribner, 2006.
    [8] Yang, C. Three factors in language variation[J]. Lingua, 2010, 120(5):1160-1177.
    [9] Yang, C.The Price of Linguistic Productivity:How Children Learn to Break the Rules of Language[M]. Cambridge, MA:MIT Press, 2016.
    [10] Rumelhart, D. & McClelland, J. On learning the past tense of English verbs:implicit rules or parallel distributed processing[A]. In McClelland, J., Rumelhart, D. & PDP Research Group (eds.). Parallel Distributed Processing:Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition[C]. Cambridge, Mass:MITPress, 1986:216-271.
    [11] Pinker, S. Rules of language[J]. Science, 1991, 253(5019):530-535.
    [12] 黄文红, 崔刚. 心理语言学研究中的过去时之争[J].外国语, 2010, 33(3):23-31.
    [13] 梁丹丹. 英语过去时习得的认知机制之争[J]. 山东外语教学, 2010, 135(2):31-36.
    [14] Pinker.S. The Language Instinct[M]. New York:Morrow, 1994.
    [15] Aronoff, M.Word Formation in Generative Grammar[M].Cambridge, MA:MIT Press, 1976.
    [16] Bresnan, J. A realistic transformational grammar[A].In Halle, J. B. & Miller, G. (eds.). Linguistic Theory and Psychological Reality[C]. Cambridge, MA:MIT Press, 1978:1-59.
    [17] Jackendoff, R. S. Morphological and semantic regularities in the lexicon[J]. Language, 1975, 51(3):639-671.
    [18] Lieber, R. On the Organization of the Lexicon[D].Unpublished MIT doctoral dissertation, 1980.
    [19] Pinker, S. & Prince, A. On language and connectionism:analysis of a parallel distributed processing model of language acquisition[J]. Cognition, 1988, 28:73-193.
    [20] Pinker, S.Words and Rules[M]. New York:Basic Books, 1999.
  • 加载中
计量
  • 文章访问数:  323
  • HTML全文浏览量:  83
  • PDF下载量:  4
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2017-03-05
  • 网络出版日期:  2021-06-18

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回