Green Grammar: A Coca-based Analysis of Classifier Collocates of OIL
-
摘要: 英语中的能源词多以不可数名词形态存在,这样的语法定义传递给人类的是:能源是取之不尽用之不竭的。语言是具有能动性的,反映现实的同时,也在参与构建现实。人类对能源的无限性意识,不自觉地不间断地影响着环境。我们应该发掘对环境恶化问题产生影响的语言,构建对环境保护问题产生作用的语言,通过语言构建世界。研究采用美国当代英语语料库(COCA),主要回答以下两个问题:(1)以oil作为中心词的搭配的分布情况;(2)上述分布最为密集的搭配所处的语境分布。研究发现:(1)price of oil在COCA中出现频率最高,表明在人类的经验中自然资源oil的经济价值占据主导地位。(2)price of oil在口语类型(SPOK)语料库中出现的频率最高,由交际时特定的国际政治文化背景(世界格局不稳)决定。国际战争致使人类金钱意识占据主导地位,生态意识缺失;国家政体应该承担主导责任,引领国人树立生态价值观,维护生态和谐。Abstract: Different from traditional grammar,Green grammar criticizes non-ecological phenomena existing in certain language system, and attempts to construct expressions which are of harmonious relationship with ecology.This paper, based on COCA,conducted an analysis of the keyword OIL by examining its classifier collocates.The result shows(1)that the most frequent collocate of OIL is PRICE,indicating that price of oil plays an important role in human experience;(2) that PRICE OF OIL occurs with the most frequency in SPOK corpus of COCA,indicating that social context plays a determining role in discourse meanings.Unsteady political structure in the world leads money ideology takes the first place of human life instead of the ultimate relationship within the ecosystem.Only certain ultimate relationship is expressed unambiguously,could such nonecological behaviors be improved to promote ecological harmoniousness.
-
Key words:
- Green grammar /
- COCA /
- resource-refered words /
- oil
-
[1] 崔桂华.生态语言学视阙下的“绿色语法”研究[J].通化师范学院学报(人文社会科学),2016,(2):36-39. [2] Steffensen,S.V.Beyond mind:an extended ecology of languaging[A].In Cowley,S.J.(ed.).Distributed Language[C].Amsterdam:John Benjamins,2011:185-210. [3] Halliday,M.A.K.New ways of meaning:the challenge to applied linguistics[J].Journal of Applied Linguistics,1990, (6):7-16.Reprinted in Webster J.(ed.).On Language and Linguistics(Vol.3 in The Collected Works of M.A.K.Halliday)[M].London:Continuum,2003:139-174. [4] 辛志英,黄国文.系统功能语言学与生态话语分析[J].外语教学,2013,(3):7-10. [5] 黄国文,肖家燕.“人类世”概念与生态语言学研究[J].外语研究,2017,(5):14-30. [6] Stibbe,A.(李佳译).批评话语研究的生态语言学进路[J].鄱阳湖学刊,2018,(1):18-25. [7] 黄国文,陈旸.作为新生学科的生态语言学[J].中国外语,2017,(5):38-46. [8] Fill,A.(范俊军,宫齐译).当代生态语言学的研究现状[J].国外社会科学,2004,(6):5-10. [9] 黄国文.生态语言学的兴起与发展[J].中国外语,2016,(13):8-12. [10] 何伟,魏榕.话语分析范式与生态话语分析的理论基础[J].当代修辞学,2018a,(05):63-73. [11] Stibbe, A.Ecolinguistics:Language, Ecology and the Stories We Live By[M].London:Routledge,2015. [12] 周文娟.中国语境下生态语言学研究的理念与实践——黄国文生态语言学研究评述[J].西安外国语大学学报,2017,(3):24-28. [13] 王晋军.绿色语法与生态和谐[J].华南理工大学学报, 2006,(8):57-60. [14] 孙儒泳,李庆芬,牛翠娟,娄安如.基础生态学[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2002. [15] 何伟,张瑞杰.生态语言学的兴起与发展[J].中国外语, 2017,(5):56-64. [16] 黄国文,陈旸.菲尔生态语言学研究评述[J].鄱阳湖学刊,2016,(4):19-24. [17] 何伟,魏榕.国际语境下的生态语言学研究[J].北京科技大学学报(社会科学版), 2018b,(02):1-5. [18] Sebille-Lopez.Philippe Géopolitiques du Pétrole[M].Beijing:Social Sciences Academic Press,2008. [19] 姚云.1990年国际形势与世界格局的变动[J].瞭望,1990,(52):40-41. [20] 王逸舟.1995年国际政治形势[J].国际经济与政治,1996,(2):8-11. [21] 李慎明,王逸舟.全球政治与安全报告(2010)[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2009. [22] Yergin, D.The Price:The Epic Quest for Oil, Money &Power[M].New York:Free,1992. [23] Leopold,A.A Sand County Almanac and Sketches Here and There[M].London:Oxford University Press,1968. [24] 郭海龙,汪希.习近平人类命运共同体思想的生成、价值和实现[J].邓小平研究,2016,(3):40-46. [25] 黄国文,Stibbe.A.(陈旸译).国际语境下的生态语言学-阿伦·斯提比教授访谈录[J].鄱阳湖学刊,2018,(1):48-53. [26] 黄国文.斯提比生态语言学研究综述[J].鄱阳湖学刊,2018,(1):42-46.
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 374
- HTML全文浏览量: 83
- PDF下载量: 20
- 被引次数: 0