Some Problems during the Discovery of Panzhihua Iron Mine——A Discussion with Mr. Liu Qinghua
-
摘要: 文章就发现攀枝花铁矿过程中的几个问题，与刘庆华先生商椎。无论是常隆庆先生的遗墨或是《宁属七县地质矿产》，都无法支持刘庆华先生的“1936年说”。1936年常隆庆先生没有到攀枝花，没有发现攀枝花铁矿，更没有发现攀枝花钒铁磁铁矿。1940年8月发现攀枝花钒钛磁铁矿这次调查，刘之祥是领队，是发现攀枝花矿产资源的代表，常隆庆只是临时加入的同行者，是没有分配具体任务的共同发现人。文章用充分的文献资料证明，刘庆华先生把常隆庆先生确立为这次调查中发现攀矿的“领导”，“代表”是没有根据的。发现攀枝花钒钛铁矿是中国地质矿产勘探史上的一件壮举，面对十多年来的是是非非，是历史屈从现实，还是现实回归历史？科学的要义是什么？再一次成为我们应该认真思考的问题。Abstract: Several problems in the Discovery of Panzhihua Iron Mine are discussed with Mr.Liu Qinghua in the paper.Mr. Liu Qinghua's statement of 1936 is not supported with Mr.Chang Longqing'smanuscripts and Minerals in Seven Counties of Ning.Mr.Chang Longqing did not come to Panzhihua in 1936，did not found Panzhihua Iron Mine，even the Panzhihua vanadium，titanium，and magnetite ores.In the survey of Discovery of Panzhihua Vanadium，Titanium and Magnetite in August of 1940，Zhixiang is the leader and representative，but Chang Longqing was just a fellow traveller temporarily joined in the survey and a co－discoverer not assigned specific tasks to.With a full literature，this paper shows thatMr.Liu Qinghua's statement：Mr.Chang Longqing was the leader and representative in the survey，is not a fact.The Discovery of Panzhihua Vanadium，Titanium and Magnetite is a feat in the history of China's geology and mineral resources exploration.Does the history submit to the reality，or the reality regress to the history？What is the essence of science？These again become the problems we should think about seriously.
-
Key words:
- Panzhihua /
- iron /
- Liu Zhixiang /
- Chang Longqing /
- Liu Qinghua /
- discovery
-
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 289
- HTML全文浏览量: 40
- PDF下载量: 9
- 被引次数: 0
下载:
