类型学视角下对语境与语域概念的再认识

刘向东

类型学视角下对语境与语域概念的再认识

刘向东

天津科技大学外国语学院, 天津 300222;香港理工大学人文学院, 香港

基金项目:

天津市教委科研计划项目“大学英语优秀教师课堂话语的人际意义研究与资源系统建构(编号为2017SK012)”的部分研究成果

详细信息

作者简介:
刘向东(1978-),男,山西大同人,天津科技大学外语学院讲师;香港理工大学人文学院博士生。

中图分类号: H0
计量
- 文章访问数: 404
- HTML全文浏览量: 72
- PDF下载量: 6
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2018-01-06
- 网络出版日期: 2021-06-01

Revisiting the Concept of Register from the Perspective of Typology

LIU Xiang-dong

Tianjin University of Science and Technology, Tianjin 300222, China

摘要

摘要: 文章首先回顾了系统功能语言学体系下语域概念的核心要义及其在语言系统中所处的层次和功能，指出韩礼德对语域概念的经典论述可以借鉴功能类型学的理念和方法进行更精密的描写。通过对语境三变量进行各自维度上的次范畴化，语境可以分出不同的活动场、语旨关系和符号实现模式。以此为标准，我们可以把语境分析为三个维度的次范畴构成的矩阵，并对不同语域类型及次类型进行更精确的描写和分析。研究还表明，语域的作用机制具有递归性，语境的三个维度动态地决定语域类型。
- 语域类型 /
- 功能变异 /
- 活动场 /
- 语境
Abstract: This paper reviews the gist, level and function of the concept of register within the overall SFL framework. Then, it points out that the ideas and methods of functional typology can shed much light on studies on register, providing resources for a finer scale of delicacy to describe register. Context can be sub-categorized in terms of three dimensions: fields of activity, tenor relationship and social semiotic mode, which accord respectively with field, tenor and mode. Based on this approach, types and subtypes of different registers can be described and interpreted precisely. The study shows that the mechanism of register is recursive through the language system, determined dynamically by the three variables of context.
- registerial typology /
- functional variation /
- field of activity /
- contex

HTML全文

参考文献(35)

[1]	Halliday, M.A. K., McIntosh, A. & Strevens, P. The Linguistic Sciences and Language Teaching [M]. London: Longman, 1964.
[2]	Halliday, M.A. K. Language as Social Semiotic: The Social Interpretation of Meaning and Language [M]. London: Edward Arnold, 1978.
[3]	Halliday, M.A. K. Explorations in the Functions of Language [M]. London: Edward Arnold,1973
[4]	Halliday,M. A. K. The notion of “context” in language education[A]. In Ghadessy, M. (ed.). Text and Context in Functional Linguistics[C].Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1999:1-25.
[5]	Hasan, R. The place of context in a systemic functional model [A]. In Halliday, M. A. K. and Webster, J. (eds.). A Companion to Systemic Functional Linguistics [C]. London and New York: Continuum, 2009: 166-189.
[6]	Halliday,M. A. K. Text as semantic choice in social contexts[A]. In Webster, J. (ed.). Linguistic Studies of Text and Discourse (Vol.2 in The Collected Works of M. A. K. Halliday) [C].London & New York: Continuum/Beijing: Peking University Press, 2002/2007: 176-225.
[7]	Halliday, M.A. K., On Grammar (Volume 1 in The Collected Works of M. A. K. Halliday) [M]. London & New York: Continuum, 2002.
[8]	Halliday, M.A. K. An Introduction to Functional Grammar [M]. London: Edward Arnold, 1985.
[9]	Halliday, M.A. K. & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. Halliday’s Introduction to Functional Grammar [M]. London: Routledge, 2014.
[10]	丁建新.作为文化的语法——功能语言学的人类学解释[J]. 现代外语, 2016, 39(4): 459-469 , 582-583.
[11]	黄国文.作为适用语言学的系统功能语言学[J].英语研究, 2006, 4(4): 1-6.
[12]	胡壮麟.解读韩礼德的Appliable Linguistics [J].四川外语学院学报, 2007, (6): 1-6.
[13]	辛志英, 黄国文.系统功能语言学研究方法论[J].外语研究, 2010, (5): 1-5, 112.
[14]	Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. Systemic Functional Linguistics as appliable linguistics: social accountability and critical approaches [J]. DELTA: Documentação de Estudosem Lingüística Teóricae Aplicada, 2012, 28 (SPE): 435-471.
[15]	Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. The “ architecture ” of language according to systemic functional theory: developments since the 1970s [A]. In Hasan, R., Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. & Webster, J. J. (eds.). Continuing Discourse on Language (Vol. 2) [C]. London and Oakville: Equinox, 2007: 505-561.
[16]	高生文,何伟. 系统功能语言学语域思想流变[J]. 外语与外语教学, 2015, (3):48-54.
[17]	Martin, J.R. English Text: System and Structure [M]. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 1992.
[18]	Martin, J. R. Language, register and genre [A]. In Cristie, F. (ed.). Children Writing: Reader [C]. Geelong, Australia: Deakin University Press, 1984: 21-30.
[19]	杨信彰. 马丁对语域理论的发展和应用[J]. 当代外语研究, 2010, (10): 39-42.
[20]	张德禄. 系统功能语言学的新发展[J]. 当代语言学, 2004, (1): 57-65.
[21]	Bickel, B. Typology in the 21st century: major current developments [J]. Linguistic Typology,2007, (11): 239-251.
[22]	王勇, 徐杰. 系统功能语言学与语言类型学[J].外国语, 2011, 34(3): 40-48.
[23]	Caffarel, A., Martin, J. R., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. C. Language Typology: A Functional Perspective (Vol. 253) [C]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing, 2004.
[24]	辛志英, 黄国文.系统功能类型学:理论、目标与方法[J].外语学刊, 2010, (5): 50-55.
[25]	杨曙, 常晨光.系统功能类型学——类型学之功能视角[J].外语与外语教学, 2013, (4): 35-38.
[26]	Halliday, M.A. K. & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. Construing Experience through Meaning: A Language-based Approach to Cognition [M]. London; New York: Cassell, 1999.
[27]	Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. and Teruya, K. Registerial hybridity: indeterminacy among fields of activity [A]. In Miller, D. & Bayley, P. (eds.). Hybridity in Systemic Functional Linguistics: Grammar, Text and Discursive Context [C]. London: Equinox, 2015: 205-238.
[28]	Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. Register in the round: registerial cartography [J]. Functional Linguistics, 2015, 2(1): 1-48.
[29]	黄国文. 韩礼德系统功能语言学40年发展述评[J]. 外语教学与研究, 2000, (1): 15-21, 78.
[30]	黄国文,辛志英.系统功能语言学研究现状和发展趋势 [M]. 北京:外语教学与研究出版社. 2014.
[31]	Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. Registerial cartography: context-based mapping of text types and their rhetorical-relational organization [A]. Proceedings of 28th Paficic Asia Conference on Language, Information and Computing [C]. Hong Kong, 2014: 5-26.
[32]	Matthiessen, C.M. I. M., Teruya, K. and Lam, M. Key Terms in Systemic Functional Linguistics [M]. London; New York: Continuum, 2010.
[33]	Hasan, R. Meaning, context and text: fifty years after Malinowski [A]. In Benson, J. D. & Greaves, W. S. (eds.). Systemic Perspectives on Discourse [C]. Norwood, N.J.: Ablex, 1985: 16-50.
[34]	Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. Applying systemic functional linguistics in healthcare contexts [J]. Text & Talk, 2013, 33 (4-5): 437-466.
[35]	Halliday, M.A. K. Learning How to Mean—Explorations in the Development of Language [M]. London: Edward Arnold, 1975.