A Contrastive Study of the Logico-semantic Relations and Their Representations between English and Chinese Clauses
-
摘要: 文章从功能角度对英汉语小句间逻辑语义关系进行了对比研究,重在呈现英汉语小句间逻辑语义关系类别及其出现概率、词汇语法和逻辑顺序表征方式上的差异,从而揭示英汉之间在认知和思维上的不同。研究发现:在类别出现概率上,英语增强类关系使用较多,而汉语延展类关系使用较多;在词汇语法表征方式上,英语的逻辑语义关系多由逻辑标记词体现,而汉语主要是通过语义关系来蕴涵;在增强顺序表征方式上也不尽相同,英语习惯先结果后原因或条件,汉语正好相反;在表征延展顺序时,英语通常按照逻辑标记词的语义排列,汉语则根据先后顺序排列。造成这些差异的原因与不同民族的认知与心理相关,西方民族重逻辑推理,汉民族重悟性和直觉。Abstract: This research contrasts the logico-semantic relations between English and Chinese clauses in the dimensions of types and representations of logico-semantic relations in order to reveal the differences between English and Chinese people in terms of cognition.The result shows that in terms of types of logico-semantic relations, in English the enhancement type is the most frequently used while in Chinese the extension type is the most frequently employed.And in English, the logico-semantic relations are often indicated by boundary markers while in Chinese, they are often implied by the semantic meanings between clauses.As for the representation of enhancement, reasons or conditions come after results in English while it is the other way round in Chinese.And as for the representation of extension, boundary markers play an important role in English, but temporal sequence is significant in Chinese.These differences can be attributed to different cognition and psychology between western and Chinese people.Western people lay emphasis on logical reasoning while Chinese on perception and intuition.
-
Key words:
- English clause /
- Chinese clause /
- logico-semantic relation /
- representation /
- national cognition
期刊类型引用(12)
1. 杨璐. 从汉语“是”字比较句及其英译看汉英主客离合特质差异. 西藏民族大学学报(哲学社会科学版). 2024(03): 130-137 . 百度学术
2. 何伟,仲伟. 系统功能语言学视角下的小句配列关系再思考. 北京科技大学学报(社会科学版). 2023(04): 431-437 . 百度学术
3. 高皓章,唐友,辛鹏,朱国东. 基于TransUnet的田间杂草分割研究. 无线互联科技. 2023(15): 100-103 . 百度学术
4. 何伟,闫煜菲. 汉英的主客融合及分离特质——以流水句及其英译为例. 上海翻译. 2022(01): 34-39 . 百度学术
5. 胡钰. 生态语言学视角下环保公示语的逻辑关系——以合肥市环保公示语为例. 湖北文理学院学报. 2022(07): 57-61 . 百度学术
6. 何伟,伟圣鑫. 英汉小句状语成分分布对比研究. 外语与外语教学. 2021(02): 39-48+148 . 百度学术
7. 何伟,程铭. 生态语言学视角下的逻辑关系系统. 解放军外国语学院学报. 2021(03): 51-59+160 . 百度学术
8. 何伟,仲伟. 从语言元功能的编码方式看英汉语本质差异. 当代修辞学. 2021(05): 26-36 . 百度学术
9. 潘杰,原苏荣. 语篇连接在GRE语文逻辑填空中的应用考察研究. 齐齐哈尔大学学报(哲学社会科学版). 2021(09): 33-38 . 百度学术
10. 宋燕青,杨劲松. 从情景语境和篇章元功能的视角走进经典传递经典——以《第二次世界大战回忆录》的翻译为例. 长春大学学报. 2021(11): 73-77 . 百度学术
11. 陈曦. China Daily环境新闻报道的小句间逻辑语义关系研究. 国际公关. 2020(05): 188+190 . 百度学术
12. 何伟,马宸. 生态语言学视角下的衔接与连贯. 北京第二外国语学院学报. 2020(02): 26-45 . 百度学术
其他类型引用(23)
-

计量
- 文章访问数: 505
- HTML全文浏览量: 124
- PDF下载量: 42
- 被引次数: 35