从历史转向的视角看科学理论选择的合理性——评库恩与拉卡托斯的理论选择标准

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名

邮箱

手机号码

标题

留言内容

验证码

On the Rationality of Scientific Theory Choice from the Perspective of Historical Turn——By Comparing the Standard of Theory Choice of Kuhn and Lakatos

摘要: 文章首先由科学哲学的历史转向以及拉卡托斯对此的反应,以此为切入点论述库恩与拉卡托斯对理论选择的合理性问题的思想。在此基础上,进一步讨论两者关于理论选择的元方法论标准,最后得出结论,拉卡托斯的理论虽然仍存在纰漏,但捍卫了科学的合理性与规范性,相比较于库恩,是一种进步。
- 历史转向 /
- 库恩 /
- 拉卡托斯 /
- 理论选择
Abstract: The paper firstly introduces the historical turn in the area of philosophy of science and the response from Lakatos, comparing the research program of Lakatos with the paradigm of Kuhn; secondly, makes a full investigation to the rationality of theory choice by criticizing the views of Kuhn and Lakatos; and finally, makes a conclusion that Lakatos' view of theory choice is more advance than that of Kuhn' s.
- historical tum /
- Kuhn /
- Lakatos /
- theory choice