The Methodological of Meaning of Burden of Proof Judgement in Civil Law System: A Concurrent Analysis of Its Misuse by Chinese Scholars
-
摘要: 我国主流的证明责任理念认为,当事人对自己的事实主张应当提供证据,不提提供证据予以证明时应当承担败诉后果,这一观点是值得反思的。证明责任理论是法律适用的例外,即当当事人的的事实主张被证明为真实或虚假时,法官只需适用或不适用相应的法律规范即可作出判决,但当事实真伪不明时,逻辑上法官处于法律适用的两难境地。为了帮助法官完成判决义务,才产生了证明责任理论。所以,时下过分夸大证明责任对于裁判的意义,是不恰当的。Abstract: The main stream of the burden of proof theory holds that the party will lose the case if he/she fails to present enough evidence; this should be altered. This theroy of burden of proof arises to help the judges finish their judging duty,therefore, it is improper to over-exagerate the meanings of burden of proof to passing judgements.
-
Key words:
- burden of proof /
- judgment /
- law application /
- methodology
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 255
- HTML全文浏览量: 50
- PDF下载量: 19
- 被引次数: 0