体验现实主义:理论争议和挑战

王馥芳

体验现实主义:理论争议和挑战

王馥芳

北京外国语大学外国语言研究所, 北京 100089

基金项目:

国家社会科学规划项目“词典释义的完备性描述研究”（编号为11BYY088）的阶段性成果。

详细信息

作者简介:
王馥芳(1969-),女,江西吉安人,北京外国语大学外国语言研究所教授,博士生导师。

中图分类号: H0
计量
- 文章访问数: 344
- HTML全文浏览量: 59
- PDF下载量: 10
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2017-03-03
- 网络出版日期: 2021-06-18

Embodied Realism: Theoretical Controversies and Challenges

WANG Fu-fang

Research Institute of Foreign Languges, Beijing Foreign Studies University, Beijing 100089, China

摘要

摘要: 自从体验现实主义作为认知语言学的直接哲学基础提出以来，其争议不断并面临诸多理论挑战是不争的事实。文章主要在探讨体验现实主义的缘起及其哲学立场的基础上，通过考察学界针对体验现实主义所作的理论批评、认知语言学者作出的相应理论回应以及体验现实主义的理论争议焦点，指出体验现实主义在理论建构层面所遭遇的理论问题和挑战。虽然体验现实主义目前并未成为主流的哲学理论，其与西方分析哲学的角力还有待进一步检验。但毋庸置疑体验现实主义是一个有着可信实证证据基础的理论假说，也是一个有效的意义哲学理论，有效解决了理智和意义的体验性本原问题。
- 体验现实主义 /
- 理论争议 /
- 理论挑战
Abstract: Since its introduction to the domain of cognitive linguistics as the direct philosophical basis of cognitive linguistics, embodied realism has been a topic full of controversies and is therefore faced with challenges. Based on the discussion of both its arising and philosophical stand, as well as the review of the theoretical criticisms concerning about embodied realism, the corresponding responses to those criticisms and the controversies evoked on embodied realism, this paper indicates out the theoretical challenges faced with embodied realism at the level of theory construction. Although there is a long way to go before western analytical philosophy will be taken over by embodied realism as the mainstream philosophical theory, embodied realism is undoubtedly a theory based on sound theoretical presupposition and reliable empirical evidence. Also, embodied realism is a valid philosophical theory of meaning, which offers a sound explanation of the embodied origin of reason and meaning.
- embodied realism /
- theoretical criticisms /
- theoretical challenges

HTML全文

参考文献(32)

[1]	Haser, V.Metaphor, Metonymy, and Experientialist Philosophy:Challenging Cognitive Semantics[M]. Berlin:Mouton de Gruyter, 2005.
[2]	Rakova, M. The philosophy of embodied realism:a high price to pay?[J]. Cognitive Linguistics, 2002, 13(3):215-244.
[3]	Lakoff, G.& Johnson, M. Philosophy in the Flesh. The Embodied Mind and Its Challenge to Western Thought[M]. New York:Basic Books, 1999
[4]	Johnson, M. & Lakoff, G. Why cognitive linguistics requires embodied realism[J]. Cognitive Linguistics.2002, 13(3):245-263.
[5]	Lakoff, G.Benjamin Bergen Louder Than Words:The New Science of How the Mind Makes Meaning[M]. New York:Basic Books, 2012.
[6]	Krzeszowski, T. P. Problems that are not supposed to arise?[J]. Cognitive Linguistics, 2002, 13(3):265-269.
[7]	Sinha, C. The cost of renovating the property:a reply to Marina Rakova[J]. Cognitive Linguistics, 2002, 13(3):271-276.
[8]	Falck, M. J. & Gibbs, W. R. Embodied motivations for metaphorical meanings[J]. Cognitive Linguistics, 2012, 23(2):251-272.
[9]	Moore, K. E. Space-to-timemappings and temporal concepts[J]. Cognitive Linguistics, 2006, 17(2):199-244.
[10]	Grady, J. E. The "Conduit metaphor" revisited:a reassessment of metaphors for communication[A]. In Koeing, J. P. (ed.). Discourse and Cognition[C]. Stanford:CSL Publications, 1998:205-218.
[11]	袁毓林. 认知科学背景上的语言研究[J]. 国外语言学, 1996, (2):1-12.
[12]	Karmakar, S. Cognitivesemantics:an extension of Cartesian Legacy[J]. Journal of Theoretical Linguistics, 2006, 3(1):1-11.
[13]	Gibbs, R. W. J. & Matlock, T. Psycholinguistics and mental representations[J]. Cognitive Linguistics, 1999, 10(3):263-269.
[14]	Sandra, D. What linguists can and can't tell you about the human mind:a reply to Croft[J]. Cognitive Linguistics, 1998, 9(4):361-378.
[15]	袁毓林. 关于认知语言学的理论思考[J]. 中国社会科学, 1994, (1):183-198.
[16]	Murphy, G. On metaphoric representations[J].Cognition, 1996, (60):173-204.
[17]	Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. Conceptual metaphor in everyday language[J]. The Journal of Philosophy, 1980b, 77(8):453-486.
[18]	Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. Metaphors We Live By[M]. Chicago:University of Chicago Press, 1980a.
[19]	Lakoff, G.& Johnson, M. Phylosophy in the Flesh:The Embodied Mind and Its Challenge to Western Thought[M]. New York:Basic Books, 1999.
[20]	Lakoff, G.乔治·莱考夫认知语言学十讲[M]. 北京:外语教学与研究出版社, 2007.
[21]	Lakoff, G.Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things. What Categories Reveal about the Mind[M]. Chicago:University of Chicago Press, 1987.
[22]	Johnson, M.The Body in the Mind:The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reason[M]. Chicago:University of Chicago Press, 1987.
[23]	Lakoff, G. Cognitive semantics[A]. In Eco, U., Santambrogio, M. and Violi, P. (eds.). Meaning and Mental Representations[C]. Bloomington and Indianapolis:Indiana University Press, 1988:119-154.
[24]	Johnson, M. Some constraints on embodied analogical reasoning[A]. In Helman, D. H. (ed.). Analogical Reasoning-Perspectives of Articial Intelligence, Cognitive Science, and Philosophy[C]. Dordrecht:Kluwer, 1988:25-40.
[25]	Lakoff, G. The contemporary theory of metaphor[A]. In Ortony, A. (ed.). Metaphor and Thought (second edition)[C]. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press, 1993:202-251.
[26]	王馥芳.认知语言学反思性批评[M]. 北京:外语教学研究出版社, 2015a.
[27]	王馥芳. 认知语言在争议中发展[N]. 中国社会科学报, 2014-03-03(A03).
[28]	王馥芳. 认知语言学过分强调"体验"[N]. 中国社会科学报, 2015-7-28(A03).
[29]	[美]杜威.经验与自然[M]. 傅统先译. 北京:中国人民大学出版社, 2012.
[30]	[英]罗素·伯特兰.心的分析[M]. 贾可春译. 北京:商务印书馆, 2009.
[31]	[德]海德格尔.在通向语言的途中[M]. 孙周兴译. 北京:商务印书馆, 1999.
[32]	[英]霍金·斯蒂芬,列那德·蒙洛迪诺.大设计[M]. 吴忠超译. 长沙:湖南科技出版社, 2011.