The Relationship between the Defend Attorney and Client in Criminal Procedure
-
摘要: 在刑事辩护中,当辩护律师与委托人的意见发生分歧时,一般以为律师不应违背委托人的意愿做出有损其合法利益的辩护。然而,当律师认为委托人的主观意愿违背了其本身的客观利益时,律师应当如何选择这一问题在法学界一直没有定论。文章首先指出:现实生活中对律师和委托人关系存在两种不同理解:完全委托模式和诉讼代行模式。在列举了美国法曹协会和日本律师联合会对上述问题的看法和有关规定后,针对日美两国对刑事辩护人职能和地位的认识差异开展了比较分析。最后,作者提出刑事辩护和律师应当开展有利于委托人的辩护活动,尊重委托人的选择和主观意愿,并通过主动的接触和沟通与委托人建立充分的信赖关系。在辩护律师与委托人在辩护方针和策略上出现矛盾时,辩护律师应当加强对委托人的理解,不能将自己的意志强加于委托人。当然,在一些特定的情况下(如委托人的精神残疾、死刑案件等),允许辩护律师凭借自身的判断为委托人提供妥当的辩护服务。Abstract: In the Criminal Procedure,the relationship between the defend attorney and client has always been a difficult problem.Sometimes, for a lawyer the client's proposal seems to be unreasonable or illogical.Should they follow the cilent's ideas to process the lawsuit or just believe themselves to select the right way? Actually there are two different opinions on this problem,one is called the "completely entrust model" and the other is called "appeal agent model".Here the author compares the role of the criminal defense lawyer made by ABA and JAA,and explains the original opinion of the previous problem.
-
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 269
- HTML全文浏览量: 45
- PDF下载量: 11
- 被引次数: 0
下载:
