Study on the Right Theory of Hayek
-
摘要: 文章通过与其他自由主义的比较研究,展现当代著名古典自由主义者哈耶克的权利理论。本文首先纵向性勾勒了近代以来的社会契约论和功利主义的权利观,说明了权利概念在其整个自由理论中的重要地位;继而指明在哈耶克的理论视野中,把自由之论证和保障的基础诉诸于权利的做法是不恰当的。接着阐述了哈耶克的以“正当行为规则”为核心的否定性权利观,并对比性地指明了罗尔斯等新自由主义者的肯定性权利观,再进而分析其理论原因是与哈耶克的进化理性主义相对立的建构理性主义认识论进路。最后总结说明了古典自由主义者哈耶克与新自由主义者罗尔斯等人在理论路向与思考方式上的差异及其原因。本文在对比分析中,以哈耶克的权利观为视角,审视批判了相关的肯定性的权利理论。Abstract: The thesis tries to demonstrate the Right theory of Hayek compared with other liberalisms. Firstly, by a historical description of the Right theories of social contractive and Utilitarianism, the important status of the concept Right in the whole liberalism is proved. And then, we point out that in Hayek's theoretical horizon it is not appropriate to regard Right as the basic concept by which proving and protecting liberty. Secondly, we try to expound Hayek's thought of Negative Right in which the Rule of Just Conduct has a core status, and as a comparison we also reveal the thoughts of Positive Right of the Neo-liberals represented by Rawls, analyzing the reason that they have epistemology approaches of Constructivist Rationalism which opposite to Hayek's epistemology approach of Evolutionary Rationalism. Lastly, we expose the differences in the theoretical approach and thinking manner between Hayek and Neo-liberals and show the reasons as well. By the discussion of Right Theory of Hayek, the thesis has also given comments and criticisms on the relevant positive Right Theories.
-
Key words:
- right /
- negative right /
- positive right
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 273
- HTML全文浏览量: 46
- PDF下载量: 24
- 被引次数: 0